Zane wrote:
An excellent example are the middle easterners. Do you think women from Iraq or Kuwait have a chance in hell of getting a degree from their home towns? I doubt it, especially since from what I understand women can not even drive there so learning is a far leap... but I have not been to the middle east yet (on my list) and therfor chalk this one up to LPP since he lives there and might be able to shed more insight.
Iraq, at least during Saddam's reign, was fairly secular, and many women were college educated if I am not mistaken. I think you're thinking of Saudi Arabia.
Zane wrote:
As for Scandinavian's ... last I checked they still had malogarchies (sp?) and had princes and princesses who ran things ... I know the prime minister of Germany is a woman ... but she is running Germany for hevans sake ... that is like a quater of the US in size comparrison.
I really don't know if you're referring to
oligarchy (rule by the few—usually some merchant or business class) or
matriarchy (rule by the mother of the household). Anyway most of the Scandinavian countries are social democracies with democratic elections and representative legislatures.
Zane wrote:
I am not sexist, I am attemptively logical. Men are concorers, women are nuturers. Women have the ability to become more intelligent if they wish.
Splitting the world into stereotyped dichotomies is not logical. Men may
tend to be more competitive and women more cooperative, but you will find plenty of exceptions, and most people have a bit of both, depending on the situation. For example, most men will certainly be quite caring towards their girlfriend/fiancée/wife and children even if competitive during a sporting event or work. Likewise, some women can be fiercely competitive (Hillary Rodham Clinton exhibits this trait to a considerable degree).
Moreover, I don't know what you mean by "becom[ing] more intelligent." Intelligence is the raw capacity to learn and adapt to one's environment, and psychological studies have shown IQ is relatively fixed throughout life (if anything, with some mental deterioration into older age). Certainly, though, one can become better educated or more knowledgeable.
Zane wrote:
No one i holding women back but themselves. Just like no one is hurting a mans chances of meeting women but his own social anxiety; end all.
For men in Western countries, self-reliance and independence are much more gender normative. You may meet with competition when your self-determined agenda is in conflict with another's, but you will not face the same level of social pressure to conform that women do. Also, it seems women may tend to be innately more sensitive to social condonement and condemnation; that is, they tend to be more sensitive about what people think of them and maintaining relationships (again, there are many exceptions). As a male and an individual with Asperger's syndrome, you simply will not feel these pressures the way they do.
That is not to say it is impossible for women, but biological and sociological pressures tend to reinforce certain attitudes and behaviors for different genders/sexes, races, physical appearance, etc. Going against the grain is never as easy (but obviously more rewarding).