sparkylabs wrote:
well apart from the fact that I don't (won't) have a licence I hate these reality type programs, I always wonder how much is put on for the audiences entertainment and how much "just happens".
I agree with you that a lot is put on for the audience's benefit
I think they find what I term 'TV Friendly' people for these programmes and the fact they are TV Friendly means they are often not like the average person with these conditions at all. They are usually more aesthetically pleasing/televisual than the average person (unless of course their condition is some kind of disfigurement) and also have extrovert, larger than life type characters ie they like talking and talk in a coherent way, using the type of phrases and vernacular that people are used to.
They are more charismatic and 'entertaining' than the average person, so there's more likelihood of them holding the audiences' interest. Then the programme makers will also edit the footage they've filmed to make the subjects come across in a particular way as well. So it is all very contrived, yes.
I still find it interesting though, for the very reason that I don't mix with other people very often at all so these programmes are like a sort of window on life and other people and I am safe at home as I don't have to interact with them, so it's the best of both worlds! I like being able to observe other people living their lives without having to take part myself.
Of course, the ultimate reality programme would be one where the camera was hidden - this would be the Holy Grail of reality TV as the people would be acting totally naturally, without knowing they were being watched! (And I have no interest in watching people going to the toilet, getting washed and dressed or having sex - that would
not be included)