'The Undateables' - UK TV series

Page 16 of 20 [ 315 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20  Next

sparkylabs
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 11 Feb 2013
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 147
Location: Northamptonshire UK

16 Feb 2013, 3:59 am

well apart from the fact that I don't (won't) have a licence I hate these reality type programs, I always wonder how much is put on for the audiences entertainment and how much "just happens".


_________________
www.rotaract.org.uk

Not been diagnosed with anything but I sure know I'm different somehow, and people treat me different, not that I care.


nessa238
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jul 2011
Age: 60
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,908
Location: UK

16 Feb 2013, 5:57 am

sparkylabs wrote:
well apart from the fact that I don't (won't) have a licence I hate these reality type programs, I always wonder how much is put on for the audiences entertainment and how much "just happens".


I agree with you that a lot is put on for the audience's benefit

I think they find what I term 'TV Friendly' people for these programmes and the fact they are TV Friendly means they are often not like the average person with these conditions at all. They are usually more aesthetically pleasing/televisual than the average person (unless of course their condition is some kind of disfigurement) and also have extrovert, larger than life type characters ie they like talking and talk in a coherent way, using the type of phrases and vernacular that people are used to.
They are more charismatic and 'entertaining' than the average person, so there's more likelihood of them holding the audiences' interest. Then the programme makers will also edit the footage they've filmed to make the subjects come across in a particular way as well. So it is all very contrived, yes.

I still find it interesting though, for the very reason that I don't mix with other people very often at all so these programmes are like a sort of window on life and other people and I am safe at home as I don't have to interact with them, so it's the best of both worlds! I like being able to observe other people living their lives without having to take part myself.

Of course, the ultimate reality programme would be one where the camera was hidden - this would be the Holy Grail of reality TV as the people would be acting totally naturally, without knowing they were being watched! (And I have no interest in watching people going to the toilet, getting washed and dressed or having sex - that would not be included)



sparkylabs
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 11 Feb 2013
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 147
Location: Northamptonshire UK

16 Feb 2013, 6:01 am

quite, that is why I refuse to beleive it is "reality", how can you act as you would knowing a camera is there, it will affect what you do.


_________________
www.rotaract.org.uk

Not been diagnosed with anything but I sure know I'm different somehow, and people treat me different, not that I care.


nessa238
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jul 2011
Age: 60
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,908
Location: UK

16 Feb 2013, 6:03 am

sparkylabs wrote:
quite, that is why I refuse to beleive it is "reality", how can you act as you would knowing a camera is there, it will affect what you do.


Totally

The people who take part are usually natural born show-offs and attention-seekers as well usually so they are actively playing to the camera/audience too.

It's people who like the sound of their own voice and who think the whole world would be interested in anything they had to say who go on these programmes.



sparkylabs
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 11 Feb 2013
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 147
Location: Northamptonshire UK

16 Feb 2013, 6:06 am

well unless they have something to say that will enrich humanity which they don't usually i have no interest. The only TV I watch is iPlayer catchup as i prefer documentaries and the like as well as well done commedy. I tend to listen to the radio more than anything though. My dad refused to have a TV when we were kids and i never really missed it (I was bullied at school anyhow so never had any friends to talk to about the crap on TV)


_________________
www.rotaract.org.uk

Not been diagnosed with anything but I sure know I'm different somehow, and people treat me different, not that I care.


sparkylabs
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 11 Feb 2013
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 147
Location: Northamptonshire UK

16 Feb 2013, 6:10 am

Adam82 wrote:
I don't really like the title 'undateables' either

Even though I have never had a girlfriend in my life, I'd prefer not to think of myself as undateable.


Join the club :oops:


_________________
www.rotaract.org.uk

Not been diagnosed with anything but I sure know I'm different somehow, and people treat me different, not that I care.


nessa238
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jul 2011
Age: 60
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,908
Location: UK

16 Feb 2013, 6:13 am

sparkylabs wrote:
well unless they have something to say that will enrich humanity which they don't usually i have no interest. The only TV I watch is iPlayer catchup as i prefer documentaries and the like as well as well done commedy. I tend to listen to the radio more than anything though. My dad refused to have a TV when we were kids and i never really missed it (I was bullied at school anyhow so never had any friends to talk to about the crap on TV)


I listen to the radio a lot too

I think reality TV programmes can be seen as a way of 'knowing your enemy' ie I see them as a way of sussing out NTs so that I know how they interact and think. It's a bit like watching dangerous animals in the zoo, knowing they can't hurt you!
(I don't agree with zoos for animals but ones for NTs would be good! lol)



sparkylabs
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 11 Feb 2013
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 147
Location: Northamptonshire UK

16 Feb 2013, 6:16 am

ooh an extrimest :D well reality TV won't teach me much.


_________________
www.rotaract.org.uk

Not been diagnosed with anything but I sure know I'm different somehow, and people treat me different, not that I care.


glow
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2010
Age: 38
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,484
Location: England

16 Feb 2013, 9:27 am

J-Greens wrote:
glow wrote:
Most people think the term 'Undateables' is bad and I tend to agree - it's rather offensive and untrue as many of the people in the show have had partners in the past.


It's probably more likely how they view themselves than some tv chief coming up with the title.

glow wrote:
why do 'outsiders' feel that the growth market on the subject of disabilites has had its day and its therefore time to backdown and let the corn reap the harvest or so to speak. sorry but if no one is gonna stand up to some of these agencies and what they believe in then dont you feel that someone has got to.


Because too much of the same topic bores people. Deal or No Deal has chronically run it's course. Cookery shows have finally eased up on the schedule, while there's more documentaries on at the moment.


That first quote was not by me and secondly you're entitled to your opinion but the wider notice out there is that people with any condition or learning disability need programes like 'the undateables' to further their outlook on life, whatever their living circumstances are.
i happen not to mind the term that much. i find it is applicable to me in any case.
what does anyone else think on this catchphrase or rather the programme. it is not meant to be offensive, but who you contact as a result is the readers bearing, no one else.



wtfid2
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Aug 2012
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,712
Location: usa

16 Feb 2013, 11:27 am

wish tequila would upload the 2 new episodes..or someone found a working proxy.


_________________
AQ 25

Your Aspie score: 101 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 111 of 200
You seem to have both Aspie and neurotypical traits


glow
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2010
Age: 38
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,484
Location: England

17 Feb 2013, 5:15 pm

wtfid2 wrote:
wish tequila would upload the 2 new episodes..or someone found a working proxy.


well, seeing as i can never find these threads, heres one i thought would illustrate the day to day realities of changing Britiain.. past ,presentand uh, ..possibly future?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tdwho_2y ... detailpage[/youtube]



wtfid2
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Aug 2012
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,712
Location: usa

17 Feb 2013, 6:19 pm

glow wrote:
wtfid2 wrote:
wish tequila would upload the 2 new episodes..or someone found a working proxy.


well, seeing as i can never find these threads, heres one i thought would illustrate the day to day realities of changing Britiain.. past ,presentand uh, ..possibly future?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tdwho_2y ... detailpage[/youtube]
by uk proxy, meant a site that hides my ip..im not sure if you quoted me by mistake or misunderstood my post lol.


_________________
AQ 25

Your Aspie score: 101 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 111 of 200
You seem to have both Aspie and neurotypical traits


Stalk
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jul 2012
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,157

17 Feb 2013, 6:25 pm

the bachelor uk 2011, Gavin Henson, he is a shy guy and not good at dealing with groups of people.... it was odd watching this supposedly super knock them over guy, be so... not like the stereotypical type person. I thought he could feature on undatables :D



nessa238
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jul 2011
Age: 60
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,908
Location: UK

17 Feb 2013, 6:31 pm

Stalk wrote:
the bachelor uk 2011, Gavin Henson, he is a shy guy and not good at dealing with groups of people.... it was odd watching this supposedly super knock them over guy, be so... not like the stereotypical type person. I thought he could feature on undatables :D


Lol 'The Batchelor' is so trashy

Gavin Henson evidently had all the personality of a plank of wood!

Charlotte Church had a lucky escape!

It's the kind of programme that's so bad it's good! :lol:



glow
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2010
Age: 38
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,484
Location: England

21 Feb 2013, 8:07 pm

All i know is i can only agree to disagree on this im afraid. my views on this topic are being expressed now as they were before and to me are pretty much self explanatory. :)
theres been alot of debates and critiscisms over the programme. but i think that this year the people really stepped up their game, their wasn't a show host by which their would be a constant narrative on who said what and to whom but was more direct and less combative in my viewing opinion.
what i am saying is if people want to stand up for themselves on a programme like 'the undateables' then they should . who would not be in their right mind anyway, to go looking out for someone there when they know that in every other real sense there is probably no one to share a toastie with.
if there were other ways of making things happen, then one should not compare fights with bachelors or otherwise be at fault of losing a win-win situation. :x :(
i wish some of these views had been posted on the womens thread as i would have stood up for my beliefs in every sense. and whats wrong with michael anyway? he might be high functioning but so what? he isnt stupid. just defenceless. good for him if he wants to go out and date, that takes courage anyway.



nessa238
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jul 2011
Age: 60
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,908
Location: UK

22 Feb 2013, 5:02 am

glow wrote:
All i know is i can only agree to disagree on this im afraid. my views on this topic are being expressed now as they were before and to me are pretty much self explanatory. :)
theres been alot of debates and critiscisms over the programme. but i think that this year the people really stepped up their game, their wasn't a show host by which their would be a constant narrative on who said what and to whom but was more direct and less combative in my viewing opinion.
what i am saying is if people want to stand up for themselves on a programme like 'the undateables' then they should . who would not be in their right mind anyway, to go looking out for someone there when they know that in every other real sense there is probably no one to share a toastie with.
if there were other ways of making things happen, then one should not compare fights with bachelors or otherwise be at fault of losing a win-win situation. :x :(
i wish some of these views had been posted on the womens thread as i would have stood up for my beliefs in every sense. and whats wrong with michael anyway? he might be high functioning but so what? he isnt stupid. just defenceless. good for him if he wants to go out and date, that takes courage anyway.


I don't think people on this thread are in disagreement with you anyway - most people think the programmes are good.