sgrannel wrote:
Several items on your list may be ambiguous or overlapping, and may already be decided when you decide you like someone. For example, if you like a guy, then his behavior may seem dominant, confident, smooth and affectionate. If you don't like him, those same behaviors might be interpreted as arrogant, intense, narrow minded, too overtly sexual, or "lapdog" like. Another guy who isn't too arrogant or too bitchy might seem like a pushover if you don't like him. Someone with broad-minded sexual interests might seem crude if you don't like him, and someone else with conventional sexual interests might seem narrow-minded if you don't like him. Someone who tries to be broad minded and is willing to temporarily suspend his disbelief in a patently false idea being presented to him, might seem like a pushover. These are just some of the possible permutations of things in your list, which, when questioned by your friends or even the guy himself, you may use as plausibly well-reasoned causes for rejecting someone, when at the end of the day, it really boils down to the fact that you just don't like him. It sounds like you've been categorizing a lot of guys as having met your difficult criteria because you liked them.
If you paint too narrow a target, many guys may just ignore you. I tend to ignore women who don't seem to have a behavioral target I can meet, no matter how good-looking they are. It's not that I'm turned off, but rather, they just don't appear on my radar screen as having potential for anything beyond "window shopping".
Dude, all it is is a list. Just like criteria lists, Ideal lists: they really don't matter in the end. I've been with people who have displayed many of those traits.
I don't really have any targets because i'm not looking and i'm still trying to get over someone else. But you're right about the "You just don't like him" thing, double standards can and do apply.