fraac wrote:
Pastafarian: which parts did I get wrong?
I said I agreed with your insightful comments on the OPs interaction, should have left her to come back at her speed, seemed needy. Needed to relax.
Where you are wrong is where you think you have a "top down view of women",
"You have to take control of the encounter or she won't feel like a woman. " Cringey bollocks.
I take control of every encounter I have ever had.
You think you can fit the whole of female kind into a pattern based on your life experiences of women, but you dont answer my question about your data (the number of females friends/interaction hours). Its like those cringey books that men write about how to win women by some formula, its "douchey" (new word for me). The beauty of people is in the detail, the complexity, nuances, the surprises. The beauty is in entering other peoples brains. You can't connect if you think you can have "a top-down view". Thats a animal (as you say), a pet not a woman.
"Top down view" my arse. Women are pets - that can be predicted, manipulated and trained. Yuk.