HisDivineMajesty wrote:
No, because that would infer sex, and the only type of sex that is morally acceptable is in missionary position for reproductive purposes only.
I agree with you to a point. I do see sex as only being permissible inside the context of marriage for purely reproductive purposes, and have turned down sex outside this context several times in my life. However, I am not one to restrict the position it can be done in as long as the end result is the same: insemination. Perhaps though my opinion would change were I to ever experience coitus due to the extreme pleasure it theoretically brings. However, I would still maintain it belongs only in a monogamous marriage between two people who would be willing to raise the offspring should pregnancy occur.
_________________
Uncertain of diagnosis, either ADHD or Aspergers.
Aspie quiz: 143/200 AS, 81/200 NT; AQ 43; "eyes" 17/39, EQ/SQ 21/51 BAPQ: Autistic/BAP- You scored 92 aloof, 111 rigid and 103 pragmatic