Do girls only care about "bad boys"?
Anna_K wrote:
Yep......another one of these typical threads......
I think that the only way that any legit girl would fall for a "bad boy" was if he pulled a nice act just to lure her into the relationship. Guys like that can be really good at toying with girls and tricking them into believing that they are good guys. Then she doesn't find out who he really is until it is too late.
Some of the girls that go for bad boys may be the "easy" type that will take any guy who will get with them.
I definitely do not go for the so called "bad boy" type, but I do like guys who are confident. Someone who is outgoing, but not in an annoying, unintelligent way. In general, I can't get along with anyone who is self-deprecating and that has a negative attitude, guy or girl, friendship or relationship.
I think that the only way that any legit girl would fall for a "bad boy" was if he pulled a nice act just to lure her into the relationship. Guys like that can be really good at toying with girls and tricking them into believing that they are good guys. Then she doesn't find out who he really is until it is too late.
Some of the girls that go for bad boys may be the "easy" type that will take any guy who will get with them.
I definitely do not go for the so called "bad boy" type, but I do like guys who are confident. Someone who is outgoing, but not in an annoying, unintelligent way. In general, I can't get along with anyone who is self-deprecating and that has a negative attitude, guy or girl, friendship or relationship.
We are alike, Anna.
Yep. They usually have a lot of uncovered mental issues too.
Klowglas wrote:
Some of what I may say, may be dark and potentially NSFW, so don't read if you don't want to be depressed, but I thnk women value 'dangeorus males' because dangerous males make excellent warriors, and it was these sort of males that have always had the most success in passing on their genes.
I read a theory the other day (here is where the potentially NSFW part comes in, don't read ahead if you don't want want to feel bummed out at this sort of darkness) that human males have evolved large penises compared to other primates because each thrust pushes semen out, so essentially the head acts as a shovel, what does this sort of scenario paint? Gang-rape. what do you think has happened historically (and even long before history) when one tribe conquers another tribe? The males are killed and the women are gang-raped by the warriors, many of the great empires of the world have operated like this, especially the Romans and Mongols.
This crap was just another common part of warfare up until recent centuries, and it might be an enormous factor in developing a woman's preference for warrior-males. I mean by putting up with a warrior-males antics, she helps to preserve society and prevent her rape, she merely has to endure when it back-fires every once in awhile, but even when this system collapses, it's another warrior-male that is going to pass on his genes through her. So it's the warrior-male that will always win out the overwhelming majority of the times, and I think this in turn makes humans much more war-like, his daughter will be reinforced in her preference for dangerous males, while the male is reinforced in his preference for battle.
I read a theory the other day (here is where the potentially NSFW part comes in, don't read ahead if you don't want want to feel bummed out at this sort of darkness) that human males have evolved large penises compared to other primates because each thrust pushes semen out, so essentially the head acts as a shovel, what does this sort of scenario paint? Gang-rape. what do you think has happened historically (and even long before history) when one tribe conquers another tribe? The males are killed and the women are gang-raped by the warriors, many of the great empires of the world have operated like this, especially the Romans and Mongols.
This crap was just another common part of warfare up until recent centuries, and it might be an enormous factor in developing a woman's preference for warrior-males. I mean by putting up with a warrior-males antics, she helps to preserve society and prevent her rape, she merely has to endure when it back-fires every once in awhile, but even when this system collapses, it's another warrior-male that is going to pass on his genes through her. So it's the warrior-male that will always win out the overwhelming majority of the times, and I think this in turn makes humans much more war-like, his daughter will be reinforced in her preference for dangerous males, while the male is reinforced in his preference for battle.
oh absolutely there are some like this:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... arges.html
I think its more the neurotypical girls.
Here is a quote from the article:
Quote:
He has beaten me many times before, but never this badly.
She takes the beatings because she wants the warrior genes.
It's only when the beating is life-threatening that she informs the police.
This makes perfect sense evolutionarily speaking.
Luckily not all women are like this.
