androbot01 wrote:
RetroGamer87 wrote:
Yeah. I should have gone to university like a normal person.
University is not for everyone. Personally I find it ridiculous that it is required for most jobs now.
Yes it's ridiculous that it's required for most jobs now. I would feel financially insecure if I had to support myself for four years without working.
I find it ridiculous that employers not only expect you to work for them but also expect you to work at university for four years before you get a paycheck.
Granted for some jobs university is absolutely necessary but nowadays it's often expected for jobs that don't have a practical requirement for it.
At work they're doing STEM recruiting now. It doesn't have to be an IT degree. Some of them are mechanical engineering graduates. The work we do has nothing to do with mechanical engineering and I've proven you can do it without a degree at all.
HR says people with a degree are just better, even if the degree is in an unrelated field. So someone is better because they work at studying for four years and live with no income for four years? I've heard about how poor university students are.
And that's only for a chance of employment. There are unemployed graduates. It's like gambling. Put your time and money on the table for a
chance of a bigger reward. If you don't win, get another degree, double or nothing, double your debt.
It's ridiculous employers expect you to study yourself into a massive debt.
Get a degree so you can go to work.
Go to work so you can pay for your degree.
But the ridiculous reality I experienced on Saturday wasn't that most jobs expect me to have a degree, it was that most people expect me to have a degree. Even outside of the workplace there's a societal expectation that I have a degree.
Did she think it would make me a better provider? I think if I had a fifty thousand dollar debt it would make me a worse provider. Better to start working immediately, it means you can start saving immediately.
She wanted to be a teacher but her grades were to low to get into a bachelor of education. She could only get into humanities. English literature. Her plan is to use this to get into school admin. She says she can work for a private school and sell parents on the excellence of the school's English lessons. Her English is so poor no school would hire her for that purpose. She'd make the parents think that school is terrible at English.
At the moment she's a shift worker in a factory with irregular hours. Her contract expires in October and will not be renewed. So which one of us is more financially stable?
androbot01 wrote:
RetroGamer87 wrote:
I think it's rude.
And then some.
I find it ironic that a culture that prides itself on politeness would do this. I find their version of "politeness" to be very superficial and as Kraftie said, it's more about "saving face". Genuine politeness is about making people feel comfortable. She was raised to think that complaining is rude so to avoid complaining she does something much ruder
_________________
The days are long, but the years are short