What traits you DON'T want in a partner
SilverStar wrote:
When it comes down to it, nobody really wants to work, but most people do anyways, because they are responsible, and have bills and food to pay for. Some people expect someone else to take care of them, though.
Even billionaires want to do something useful with their time than sit around texting or playing video games all day.
I’m attracted to entrepreneur minds, as it aligns with my thinking. There is still plenty of time for other hobbies.
The least attractive traits are liars, people with no desire not to be on a benefit, the mundane, abusers, theives and drug addicts. I’d rather die alone than be with those people.
SilverStar wrote:
Traits that I absolutely DON'T want:
Anyone with Cluster B Personality Disorders.
These Include:
1. Antisocial Personality Disorder
2. Borderline Personality Disorder
3. Narcissistic Personality Disorder
4. Histrionic Personality Disorder
I can deal most people that have mental health issues, but people that have these disorders generally drive me, and everyone else around them crazy. Not only do they generally lack empathy toward other people, but they are usually unstable, create unnecessary drama, and it's almost impossible to make them aware of their wrongdoing.
Anyone with Cluster B Personality Disorders.
These Include:
1. Antisocial Personality Disorder
2. Borderline Personality Disorder
3. Narcissistic Personality Disorder
4. Histrionic Personality Disorder
I can deal most people that have mental health issues, but people that have these disorders generally drive me, and everyone else around them crazy. Not only do they generally lack empathy toward other people, but they are usually unstable, create unnecessary drama, and it's almost impossible to make them aware of their wrongdoing.
That’s rubbish. I have a mild case of BPD and I am the most self aware person I’ve ever met.
The worst I experience with that disorder is fear of abandonment, black and white thinking, and fear of being screwed over. I can see when the fault is mine instantly, and have a lot of empathy for the vulnerable, animals, elderly people, small children, disabled people. Though the latter might be some form of PTSD.
I can’t believe someone with aspergers could be so overly judgemental about another disorder.
On one hand people say autistics cop flack they don’t deserve, but are the first to judge people with other disorders.
I have a lot wrong with me. A lot. Aspergers is the tip of a very, very large iceberg.
People with only aspergers are actually lucky.
hale_bopp wrote:
SilverStar wrote:
When it comes down to it, nobody really wants to work, but most people do anyways, because they are responsible, and have bills and food to pay for. Some people expect someone else to take care of them, though.
Even billionaires want to do something useful with their time than sit around texting or playing video games all day.
Most billionaires are motivated by the prospect of making more money as opposed to a desire to do something useful though. I don't think many people would work if they were no better off after working. I've been working full-time for a month now and I will continue to do so because I'm enjoying the fruits of my labour in the form of a paycheque.
If I suddenly stopped receiving pay, or I started receiving the same money I would get from my pay regardless of whether I worked or not, suddenly the prospect of getting up at 5am to go and assemble wheelbarrows wouldn't appeal to me very much.
I'm not doing work for work's sake, but I'm happy enough to work for the dosh I'm receiving in return.
The Grand Inquisitor wrote:
hale_bopp wrote:
SilverStar wrote:
When it comes down to it, nobody really wants to work, but most people do anyways, because they are responsible, and have bills and food to pay for. Some people expect someone else to take care of them, though.
Even billionaires want to do something useful with their time than sit around texting or playing video games all day.
Most billionaires are motivated by the prospect of making more money as opposed to a desire to do something useful though. I don't think many people would work if they were no better off after working. I've been working full-time for a month now and I will continue to do so because I'm enjoying the fruits of my labour in the form of a paycheque.
If I suddenly stopped receiving pay, or I started receiving the same money I would get from my pay regardless of whether I worked or not, suddenly the prospect of getting up at 5am to go and assemble wheelbarrows wouldn't appeal to me very much.
I'm not doing work for work's sake, but I'm happy enough to work for the dosh I'm receiving in return.
They don’t. They’re active minds and not working gets boring to them.
Sometimes I struggle to motivate myself to go to a job, But for some reason am usually depressed on weekends.
hale_bopp wrote:
The Grand Inquisitor wrote:
hale_bopp wrote:
SilverStar wrote:
When it comes down to it, nobody really wants to work, but most people do anyways, because they are responsible, and have bills and food to pay for. Some people expect someone else to take care of them, though.
Even billionaires want to do something useful with their time than sit around texting or playing video games all day.
Most billionaires are motivated by the prospect of making more money as opposed to a desire to do something useful though. I don't think many people would work if they were no better off after working. I've been working full-time for a month now and I will continue to do so because I'm enjoying the fruits of my labour in the form of a paycheque.
If I suddenly stopped receiving pay, or I started receiving the same money I would get from my pay regardless of whether I worked or not, suddenly the prospect of getting up at 5am to go and assemble wheelbarrows wouldn't appeal to me very much.
I'm not doing work for work's sake, but I'm happy enough to work for the dosh I'm receiving in return.
They don’t. They’re active minds and not working gets boring to them.
Sometimes I struggle to motivate myself to go to a job, But for some reason am usually depressed on weekends.
If you've ever watched Shark Tank, you'd know they're in it for the money. Billionaires don't get to be billionaires without the motivation to make money, unless they have a damn good product or service that people love.
I don't think many people would be keen to work for nothing, except maybe those who volunteer because they feel strongly about helping people or about a specific organisation.
hale_bopp wrote:
The Grand Inquisitor wrote:
hale_bopp wrote:
SilverStar wrote:
When it comes down to it, nobody really wants to work, but most people do anyways, because they are responsible, and have bills and food to pay for. Some people expect someone else to take care of them, though.
Even billionaires want to do something useful with their time than sit around texting or playing video games all day.
Most billionaires are motivated by the prospect of making more money as opposed to a desire to do something useful though. I don't think many people would work if they were no better off after working. I've been working full-time for a month now and I will continue to do so because I'm enjoying the fruits of my labour in the form of a paycheque.
If I suddenly stopped receiving pay, or I started receiving the same money I would get from my pay regardless of whether I worked or not, suddenly the prospect of getting up at 5am to go and assemble wheelbarrows wouldn't appeal to me very much.
I'm not doing work for work's sake, but I'm happy enough to work for the dosh I'm receiving in return.
They don’t. They’re active minds and not working gets boring to them.
Sometimes I struggle to motivate myself to go to a job, But for some reason am usually depressed on weekends.
Maybe for a few of them. Most just do it to make more money to put in their banks to brag about to other rich people. Not all billionaires even work or do anything other then party, cruise on their yachts, or drive their super cars around. Or is Paris Hilton an active mind who gets bored if she doesn’t work?
Few might just enjoy working to keep busy but doesn’t mean they all do. It’s about money. Quite a few are happy to sit back and let the money flow in. I’d run a store if I had money. Probably limited hours. I don’t have to work as is, I don’t make much more then if I just was on benifits. I wasn’t required to work. I asked to work, I sought help to find work after I failed to do so alone. I had to fight them to keep helping me find work when they wanted to stop and say I was unemployable. I lucked out and got hired just as they were going pull the plug. There’s quite a few rich people happy enough to spend their parents money and never work a day in their life
The Grand Inquisitor wrote:
hale_bopp wrote:
The Grand Inquisitor wrote:
hale_bopp wrote:
SilverStar wrote:
When it comes down to it, nobody really wants to work, but most people do anyways, because they are responsible, and have bills and food to pay for. Some people expect someone else to take care of them, though.
Even billionaires want to do something useful with their time than sit around texting or playing video games all day.
Most billionaires are motivated by the prospect of making more money as opposed to a desire to do something useful though. I don't think many people would work if they were no better off after working. I've been working full-time for a month now and I will continue to do so because I'm enjoying the fruits of my labour in the form of a paycheque.
If I suddenly stopped receiving pay, or I started receiving the same money I would get from my pay regardless of whether I worked or not, suddenly the prospect of getting up at 5am to go and assemble wheelbarrows wouldn't appeal to me very much.
I'm not doing work for work's sake, but I'm happy enough to work for the dosh I'm receiving in return.
They don’t. They’re active minds and not working gets boring to them.
Sometimes I struggle to motivate myself to go to a job, But for some reason am usually depressed on weekends.
If you've ever watched Shark Tank, you'd know they're in it for the money. Billionaires don't get to be billionaires without the motivation to make money, unless they have a damn good product or service that people love.
I don't think many people would be keen to work for nothing, except maybe those who volunteer because they feel strongly about helping people or about a specific organisation.
I don’t know about saying that people would work for nothing. You have to work for money or you’ll die, unless you live off other people’s tax money. Billionaires don’t need to work for money. The money makes itsself. That’s why they run charities etcetera.
Also a lot of people do work for nothing in volunteer positions, and I doubt there are many who would say they get nothing out of it.
sly279 wrote:
hale_bopp wrote:
The Grand Inquisitor wrote:
hale_bopp wrote:
SilverStar wrote:
When it comes down to it, nobody really wants to work, but most people do anyways, because they are responsible, and have bills and food to pay for. Some people expect someone else to take care of them, though.
Even billionaires want to do something useful with their time than sit around texting or playing video games all day.
Most billionaires are motivated by the prospect of making more money as opposed to a desire to do something useful though. I don't think many people would work if they were no better off after working. I've been working full-time for a month now and I will continue to do so because I'm enjoying the fruits of my labour in the form of a paycheque.
If I suddenly stopped receiving pay, or I started receiving the same money I would get from my pay regardless of whether I worked or not, suddenly the prospect of getting up at 5am to go and assemble wheelbarrows wouldn't appeal to me very much.
I'm not doing work for work's sake, but I'm happy enough to work for the dosh I'm receiving in return.
They don’t. They’re active minds and not working gets boring to them.
Sometimes I struggle to motivate myself to go to a job, But for some reason am usually depressed on weekends.
Maybe for a few of them. Most just do it to make more money to put in their banks to brag about to other rich people. Not all billionaires even work or do anything other then party, cruise on their yachts, or drive their super cars around. Or is Paris Hilton an active mind who gets bored if she doesn’t work?
Few might just enjoy working to keep busy but doesn’t mean they all do. It’s about money. Quite a few are happy to sit back and let the money flow in. I’d run a store if I had money. Probably limited hours. I don’t have to work as is, I don’t make much more then if I just was on benifits. I wasn’t required to work. I asked to work, I sought help to find work after I failed to do so alone. I had to fight them to keep helping me find work when they wanted to stop and say I was unemployable. I lucked out and got hired just as they were going pull the plug. There’s quite a few rich people happy enough to spend their parents money and never work a day in their life
You’re confusing reality TV trash and trust fund kids with hard working people who build a business like Richard Branson. You can’t compare him with Paris Hilton, that’s laughable.
You just made the bragging bit up by the sound of it. I doubt you know many people who have built up their own business.
hale_bopp wrote:
I don’t know about saying that people would work for nothing. You have to work for money or you’ll die, unless you live off other people’s tax money. Billionaires don’t need to work for money. The money makes itsself. That’s why they run charities etcetera.
Also a lot of people do work for nothing in volunteer positions, and I doubt there are many who would say they get nothing out of it.
Also a lot of people do work for nothing in volunteer positions, and I doubt there are many who would say they get nothing out of it.
When I say work for nothing, I mean if there was no net benefit from working. Like if I could receive the money I do regardless of whether I work or not, I wouldn't bother working, and if I did, it would be elsewhere to earn more money on top of what I'm already getting.
Billionaires need to keep on top of their businesses in order to ensure that they're profitable and running well. Charities are sometimes created for the purpose of tax evasion. They donate a heap of their own money to the charity and then they don't have to pay tax on that money.
I covered volunteer positions in my last post. You're essentially echoing what I said at the end of it.
hale_bopp wrote:
sly279 wrote:
hale_bopp wrote:
The Grand Inquisitor wrote:
hale_bopp wrote:
SilverStar wrote:
When it comes down to it, nobody really wants to work, but most people do anyways, because they are responsible, and have bills and food to pay for. Some people expect someone else to take care of them, though.
Even billionaires want to do something useful with their time than sit around texting or playing video games all day.
Most billionaires are motivated by the prospect of making more money as opposed to a desire to do something useful though. I don't think many people would work if they were no better off after working. I've been working full-time for a month now and I will continue to do so because I'm enjoying the fruits of my labour in the form of a paycheque.
If I suddenly stopped receiving pay, or I started receiving the same money I would get from my pay regardless of whether I worked or not, suddenly the prospect of getting up at 5am to go and assemble wheelbarrows wouldn't appeal to me very much.
I'm not doing work for work's sake, but I'm happy enough to work for the dosh I'm receiving in return.
They don’t. They’re active minds and not working gets boring to them.
Sometimes I struggle to motivate myself to go to a job, But for some reason am usually depressed on weekends.
Maybe for a few of them. Most just do it to make more money to put in their banks to brag about to other rich people. Not all billionaires even work or do anything other then party, cruise on their yachts, or drive their super cars around. Or is Paris Hilton an active mind who gets bored if she doesn’t work?
Few might just enjoy working to keep busy but doesn’t mean they all do. It’s about money. Quite a few are happy to sit back and let the money flow in. I’d run a store if I had money. Probably limited hours. I don’t have to work as is, I don’t make much more then if I just was on benifits. I wasn’t required to work. I asked to work, I sought help to find work after I failed to do so alone. I had to fight them to keep helping me find work when they wanted to stop and say I was unemployable. I lucked out and got hired just as they were going pull the plug. There’s quite a few rich people happy enough to spend their parents money and never work a day in their life
You’re confusing reality TV trash and trust fund kids with hard working people who build a business like Richard Branson. You can’t compare him with Paris Hilton, that’s laughable.
You just made the bragging bit up by the sound of it. I doubt you know many people who have built up their own business.
A lot of billionaires todays are kids of people who worked for their money in the 1920s-60s
They don’t run charities or work. The Walmart family sits back as it’s horrible stores ruin the the world and make them money. They don’t work as they don’t have to. You take a few billionaires and romantize them as all billionnairs are like them. And most who do charities do it for tax write offs and publicity. If bill gates actually cared about helping people he’d be broke and pennyless from spending his money helping. He’d open his homes to poor he wouldn’t spend 500 million on a vacation. That could have helped millions of people. Bill gates could single handlly solve homelessness. Any billionaire could but they don’t they value money over humans lives.
My uncle built his own business, he was a hippie. He’s not a billionaire like bill gates. No I’m trash to billionaires they associate with other billionaires and millionaires they don’t tend to hang out with poor people. How many billionaires do you know?
The Grand Inquisitor wrote:
hale_bopp wrote:
I don’t know about saying that people would work for nothing. You have to work for money or you’ll die, unless you live off other people’s tax money. Billionaires don’t need to work for money. The money makes itsself. That’s why they run charities etcetera.
Also a lot of people do work for nothing in volunteer positions, and I doubt there are many who would say they get nothing out of it.
Also a lot of people do work for nothing in volunteer positions, and I doubt there are many who would say they get nothing out of it.
When I say work for nothing, I mean if there was no net benefit from working. Like if I could receive the money I do regardless of whether I work or not, I wouldn't bother working, and if I did, it would be elsewhere to earn more money on top of what I'm already getting.
Billionaires need to keep on top of their businesses in order to ensure that they're profitable and running well. Charities are sometimes created for the purpose of tax evasion. They donate a heap of their own money to the charity and then they don't have to pay tax on that money.
I covered volunteer positions in my last post. You're essentially echoing what I said at the end of it.
Conservatives romanticize rich people cause they want to be then one day. Rich people throw middle class conservatives under the bus then tel them it’s the poor peoples fault. So conservatives hate poor and love the rich all while the rich screw them over.
hale_bopp wrote:
SilverStar wrote:
Traits that I absolutely DON'T want:
Anyone with Cluster B Personality Disorders.
These Include:
1. Antisocial Personality Disorder
2. Borderline Personality Disorder
3. Narcissistic Personality Disorder
4. Histrionic Personality Disorder
I can deal most people that have mental health issues, but people that have these disorders generally drive me, and everyone else around them crazy. Not only do they generally lack empathy toward other people, but they are usually unstable, create unnecessary drama, and it's almost impossible to make them aware of their wrongdoing.
Anyone with Cluster B Personality Disorders.
These Include:
1. Antisocial Personality Disorder
2. Borderline Personality Disorder
3. Narcissistic Personality Disorder
4. Histrionic Personality Disorder
I can deal most people that have mental health issues, but people that have these disorders generally drive me, and everyone else around them crazy. Not only do they generally lack empathy toward other people, but they are usually unstable, create unnecessary drama, and it's almost impossible to make them aware of their wrongdoing.
That’s rubbish. I have a mild case of BPD and I am the most self aware person I’ve ever met.
The worst I experience with that disorder is fear of abandonment, black and white thinking, and fear of being screwed over. I can see when the fault is mine instantly, and have a lot of empathy for the vulnerable, animals, elderly people, small children, disabled people. Though the latter might be some form of PTSD.
I can’t believe someone with aspergers could be so overly judgemental about another disorder.
On one hand people say autistics cop flack they don’t deserve, but are the first to judge people with other disorders.
I have a lot wrong with me. A lot. Aspergers is the tip of a very, very large iceberg.
People with only aspergers are actually lucky.
First of all, I did say in my post that I get along well with most people with mental health problems. In fact, I try to get along with most people, mental health issues, or not. It has nothing to do with judging anybody, it has to do with what I have experienced first hand, in the real world. I have met many people with these disorders, and they all have pretty much behaved the same way. I have actually tried to help some of them, but most of them either didn't want it, believed in their minds that they didn't need it, or they just tried to take advantage of me.
It helps that you are self aware, and you are a mild case, but the people that I have met, had the full-blown personality disorders, and either weren't aware of their issues, or they were, and didn't care.
