"You need to work on yourself!"
When I ask for advice, I fully expect to be told first what I have been doing wrong. Sure, it “hurts”, but with greater maturity has come greater tolerance for that kind of “pain”. Pain is inevitable, while misery is a choice.
That’s why “grow up” is a vital part of any effort of self-improvement.
Sorry, I wasn't clear, I meant it's rude when people give you advice on self-improvement when you haven't asked
for advice on self-improvement.
Maybe if you just improved yourself you wouldn't feel insulted by advice to improve yourself. Didn't consider that one, did you?
This concept of improvement always implies that everyone with relationships only got into them because they'd finished their "improving" and hence are inherently of more value than everyone else. Frankly it is rude. It's extra insulting when the advice is something stupid like "lift weights", as though that's the magical missing ingredient.
I don't feel insulted, I feel hurt. Most self-help advice given to me involves a complete personality change. And I
do work on myself but on the things that I think I need work on and that are achievable.
_________________
climate change petition, please sign
Petition against Amazon selling 'make downs extinct' t-shirts. And other hate speech paraphernalia.
https://www.quora.com/What-does-it-feel ... active-man
I think it’s a real shame that we teach men this foul lie that ‘women care about what’s on the inside.’ By and large, in romantic relationships, neither men nor women care very much about character, except, sometimes, when you get to the point of considering a life partnership. Men are taught that ugly guys are ‘cute’ or ‘funny,’ and that if we just work hard to be good people we can succeed in romance. This is utter horses**t.
The lie is foul, because it makes us set up an unfair expectation on women. Women have no obligation to judge sexual partners on their intellects and characters. Demanding that of them is unfair, and makes it easy to hate, instead of accepting that ugliness is another limitation some of us our born with, just like our raw athletic potential, or any genetic component of our intelligence, or a congenital disease.
I think it’s a real shame that we teach men this foul lie that ‘women care about what’s on the inside.’ By and large, in romantic relationships, neither men nor women care very much about character, except, sometimes, when you get to the point of considering a life partnership. Men are taught that ugly guys are ‘cute’ or ‘funny,’ and that if we just work hard to be good people we can succeed in romance. This is utter horses**t.
The lie is foul, because it makes us set up an unfair expectation on women. Women have no obligation to judge sexual partners on their intellects and characters. Demanding that of them is unfair, and makes it easy to hate, instead of accepting that ugliness is another limitation some of us our born with, just like our raw athletic potential, or any genetic component of our intelligence, or a congenital disease.
That's a really good article and I agree with what he says. the only thing I would add is that most people of both
sexes are neither good looking or ugly and personality does make a difference for them along with all the other
stuff such as job, wealth, culture. Neither the very good looking or the very ugly get what's fair.
_________________
climate change petition, please sign
Petition against Amazon selling 'make downs extinct' t-shirts. And other hate speech paraphernalia.
I find life is getting fairer with age, what I get reflects more the time effort I put in to getting it. That's not true for
anyone when they are young. And some people have really bad luck.
_________________
climate change petition, please sign
Petition against Amazon selling 'make downs extinct' t-shirts. And other hate speech paraphernalia.
To succeed in romance or relationships is a faulty concept. You succeed in work, with goals or with interests, but romance is nothing like any of them, and so "succeed" is a faulty concept in relation to romance.
Similarly, to get what you deserve could be useful in relation to social issues, and perhaps work, but it is a faulty concept in relation to romance.
In fact, most things that are relevant for work typically are irrelevant for romance.
_________________
climate change petition, please sign
Petition against Amazon selling 'make downs extinct' t-shirts. And other hate speech paraphernalia.
_________________
Diagnosed with ADHD
Online Autism/ Asperger's Screening = 38 (Autism likely)
Last edited by Gallia on 03 Dec 2018, 8:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
no i ruin every good relationship because i'm angsty and cant keep my thoughts to myself
to illustrate - i'll notice if he appears less interested from minute details and get upset (as in sad, not angry). Ik it's stupid and ik relationships aren't always lovey dovey etc but i jump to catastrophic conclusions which is a shame. never had a long term relationship and im pretty honest abt i'm to blame lol
_________________
Diagnosed with ADHD
Online Autism/ Asperger's Screening = 38 (Autism likely)
yeah >< my damn lack of filters! then I feel bad about it and make things worse. I'm well meaning but hella clumsy. hopefully i'v learnt my lesson for next time.
_________________
Diagnosed with ADHD
Online Autism/ Asperger's Screening = 38 (Autism likely)
I think it’s a real shame that we teach men this foul lie that ‘women care about what’s on the inside.’ By and large, in romantic relationships, neither men nor women care very much about character, except, sometimes, when you get to the point of considering a life partnership. Men are taught that ugly guys are ‘cute’ or ‘funny,’ and that if we just work hard to be good people we can succeed in romance. This is utter horses**t.
The lie is foul, because it makes us set up an unfair expectation on women. Women have no obligation to judge sexual partners on their intellects and characters. Demanding that of them is unfair, and makes it easy to hate, instead of accepting that ugliness is another limitation some of us our born with, just like our raw athletic potential, or any genetic component of our intelligence, or a congenital disease.
What malarkey! I’m sorry, but what is on the “inside” is the most important thing in any relationship, casual, professional or romantic. At the same time, being a “good person” guarantees nothing.
