The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
thewhitrbbit wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Quote:
There is no way to determine if any woman is (un)attractive to men without seeing what she really looks like. Men are visually (un)attracted to women, and any man who has wasted any time on a dating website will be cynical about any description that a woman will post about herself.
Women are equally visual.
The common "women are less visual than men" saying is totally BS.
Yep. And they HATE being called on it.
Because they believe they're the "less shallow" gender - telling them the truth would shock them.
I'm not entirely sure this is true. Generally of course women are attracted to men they find attractive but with my girl friends I seem to talk about personality a lot more than I do with men....for example, even if a man is objectively attractive, I'm honestly not attracted to them unless they can hold their own with me intellectually. This is of course equally shallow (and most women know that we're really not that much better than men when we are looking to initiate something) but I think you could make a case that men's objectification of women mostly stops at looks, whereas women objectify men based on looks as well as certain personality traits....then again these are all generalizations, just my point of view.
Anyway to the OP, I very much get what you're saying about being reasonably attractive and not getting much attention from guys, and ya, I echo what other people have said in that's it's about approachability, and not as much about looks. They do obviously play a factor but like you said, everyone who puts in some kind of effort is attractive in their own way so its just a matter of things like eye contact, smiling and creating favorable conditions for meeting people which is important. I think some people just have that winning combination of looks and charm, whereas others have to work a bit harder to create opportunity, but it's definitely possible to get better at it.