Women SAY they want nice guys ...

Page 5 of 9 [ 129 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

Geekonychus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Nov 2012
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,660

04 Feb 2014, 10:33 am

Shau wrote:
salamandaqwerty wrote:
Shau wrote:
Halfmadgenius wrote:
No. I really do want a man who is kind and patient with me but can take charge when I really am unsure and indecisive.


You don't need a man to do these things, you should not rely on men in such a fashion.


No where are they quoted as saying they need anything. They have just stated qualities they would like in a man. They 'should' do what ever they like.


I'd argue what she SHOULD do is learn to squash her indecisive bouts. When a woman says things like "I want a man to be strong for me when things get all scary and hard" without following it with "And likewise I wanna be strong when things get all scary and hard for him", it just makes women seem weak, which is nothing but fodder for MRA-style BS.

You're making a lot assumptions. Just because she has expectations (or at least a general idea) about what she's looking for in a partner, doesn't mean she doesn't expect her partner to have his own set of expectations.

I failed to notice the part in Halfmadgenius's post where she said she wanted a partner who she could use as a crutch for all her issues and who didn't expect anything from her in return. Where are you getting it from?

If she's anything like my partner (who has to take a tough Dominant position at her job and therefore prefers having a more Submissive position at home) "take charge when I really am unsure and indecisive" usually means being able to decide where we should eat or what movie to watch or what position to take in bed because she either doesn't care or can't decide. It doesn't mean "obey me and respect my authority as head of household while I make all major decisions for us." The former is an aspect of a true partnership, the latter is traditionalist MRA BS.



JCJC777
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 19 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 396

04 Feb 2014, 10:39 am

Shau wrote:
JCJC777 wrote:
the common NT woman model is
- have responsible, faithful (dull) man to marry, have kids with, provide for her and her kids
- have some flings with alpha male types when fertile, to get some alpha male kids into the gene pool of the tribe


The wise man learns to combine the best properties of both of these men. You act as if being responsible and exciting are mutually-exclusive. You're projecting.


dream on. a sure-fire way to make your life impossible and painful is to demand of yourself things you can't deliver.



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,949
Location:      

04 Feb 2014, 10:56 am

JCJC777 wrote:
the common NT woman model is
- have responsible, faithful (dull) man to marry, have kids with, provide for her and her kids
- have some flings with alpha male types when fertile, to get some alpha male kids into the gene pool of the tribe

Stereotype much?

:roll:



Shau
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Oct 2009
Age: 166
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,270

04 Feb 2014, 11:07 am

Geekonychus wrote:
You're making a lot assumptions.


List these assumptions.

Quote:
Just because she has expectations (or at least a general idea) about what she's looking for in a partner, doesn't mean she doesn't expect her partner to have his own set of expectations.


I didn't imply otherwise. I only stated that wanting a man to "take charge for her" while she's being "indecisive and unsure" without making it clear she would want to be prepared to do the same runs the risk of making her look a bit weak. Any MRA reading that statement from a woman would otherwise have a field day.

Quote:
I failed to notice the part in Halfmadgenius's post where she said she wanted a partner who she could use as a crutch for all her issues and who didn't expect anything from her in return. Where are you getting it from?


She said WHEN she's indecisive and unsure. That implies she wouldn't need any crutches the rest of the time. The Devil's in the details, and I'm well-acquainted with the Devil.

Quote:
If she's anything like my partner (who has to take a tough Dominant position at her job and therefore prefers having a more Submissive position at home) "take charge when I really am unsure and indecisive" usually means being able to decide where we should eat or what movie to watch or what position to take in bed because she either doesn't care or can't decide. It doesn't mean "obey me and respect my authority as head of household while I make all major decisions for us." The former is an aspect of a true partnership, the latter is traditionalist MRA BS.


Maybe. Seems unlikely though, given the way she put it, I have my doubts that she's needing a man to "take charge" about what they're having for dinner or the movie they'll watch while eating it. Consider this my one assumption, if you will.

JCJC777 wrote:
dream on. a sure-fire way to make your life impossible and painful is to demand of yourself things you can't deliver.


...the implication here being that it would make one's life "impossible" to attempt to be exciting and responsible at the same time? I took a girl out to dancing once, showed her a fun, exciting time while we were dancing, and then drove her home and walked her to the door to make sure she got inside safe. A textbook example of being both exciting and responsible at the same time.

Sounds to me like you just don't have what it takes to be exciting.



Venger
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 15 Apr 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,519

04 Feb 2014, 11:37 am

Geekonychus wrote:
salamandaqwerty wrote:
I think it takes strength to be kind and I can't see why you can't be sensitive and decisive and strong at the same time. It confuses me why people would think otherwise.

I firmly believe the biggest dating obstical people on the spectrum face isn't social skills but black and white thinking. The kind of mindest that convinces a person they either need to be a "super assertive as*hole" or a "complete doormat" and that there's no middleground between the two.



Replace the word in bold with "aggressive".

There's mainly three types of people: passive, assertive, and aggressive ones. "Passive" ones think they have no rights but others do. "Aggressive" ones think they have all the rights and nobody else does. And "assertive" ones believe that everybody has rights, and they represent the moderate middle-ground you speak of.



Who_Am_I
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Aug 2005
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,632
Location: Australia

04 Feb 2014, 11:43 am

MegaBass wrote:
Yet you created THIS thread.


Someone didn't click on the link in the first post. :)


_________________
Music Theory 101: Cadences.
Authentic cadence: V-I
Plagal cadence: IV-I
Deceptive cadence: V- ANYTHING BUT I ! !! !
Beethoven cadence: V-I-V-I-V-V-V-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I
-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I! I! I! I I I


Who_Am_I
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Aug 2005
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,632
Location: Australia

04 Feb 2014, 11:45 am

SoulcakeDuck wrote:
Aaendi wrote:
Soccer22 wrote:
aspiesandra27 wrote:
"Nice" has to be one of the most boring words we have.

I think no one wants an evil person. A dishonest person. But certain males here insist on thinking in black and white. That men are either nice or bad. Then often the ones that are rejected the most, like to attack, and say women are stupid and they say they want nice guys, but they don't really. That what they really want is bad guys. Because "so so" is a good man, and keeps being rejected.

I love how simplistic some of these views are.

No one is perfect. But there's always someone more suited for each one of us.


To add onto this. The "nice" guy that was rejected automatically assumes that the girl rejected him because he's nice. I've never rejected a guy because he was nice. Maybe guys need to really do some introspecting on this topic. Maybe they were needy, not showing they were trustworthy, maybe they weren't funny enough, or maybe, simply, the girl just wasn't attracted. There's so many reasons for rejection and it 99.9% of the time isn't happening due to someone being nice.


Honestly, I never thought that being nice was a turn off for women until the internet got loaded with all this "nice guy" garbage.


Ty, just what I was thinking.
Men simply chose women better than women chose men.
Silly little girls go chasing after trash in tattoos and piercings, and then they come back hurt crying on your shoulder and you're a as*hole for not wanting to hear it.

No wonder the nice guy who gets friend zoned gets pissed when he knows what he wants and that's her, but she's not in to him because she wants to go chase scum and cool looking dudes wearing t-shirts of owls with mustaches... . . .. . .. .
And when horny tattoo guy is done pounding this lil gal she's suddenly used and exploited and hurt and bla bla bla.


You know what most guys do when we get rejected and treated badly? We get the f**k up again and whine to no one trying again to make some stupid girl recognize true character and value.

I have no sympathy for girls who f**k them selves like that over and over and over...
This "nice" label is very dumb.


I cannot see any possible reason why you aren't covered in women right now.


_________________
Music Theory 101: Cadences.
Authentic cadence: V-I
Plagal cadence: IV-I
Deceptive cadence: V- ANYTHING BUT I ! !! !
Beethoven cadence: V-I-V-I-V-V-V-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I
-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I! I! I! I I I


Who_Am_I
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Aug 2005
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,632
Location: Australia

04 Feb 2014, 11:46 am

Lilya wrote:
SoulcakeDuck wrote:
Halfmadgenius wrote:
SoulcakeDuck wrote:
Halfmadgenius wrote:
I want a man who is kind, compassionate, patient, and respectful. But he also has to be decisive and able to stand up for himself and take charge when need be. I want a nice guy, not a doormat.


Is this sarcasm? I really don't know...

I also want things. But my Christmas list would be frowned upon.


No. I really do want a man who is kind and patient with me but can take charge when I really am unsure and indecisive.



Because it's contradicting and it sounds like you need a dog.

So every time things get hard for you he will stop everything and embrace you, protect you and care for you, and he will never ever push you towards things you don't like or are alien to you, even tho they are not harmful you just don't like them for a reason. He's going to accept that,and then he's going to alter his plans for you.
But then his strong, confident leader persona kicks in and he wants to guide you show you new things, he's also getting bored and impatient now but you're still not ready and he understands that so he goes and sits in a corner and waits for you because he is patient, filled with empathy but also take charge.... when need be. When you feel charge should be taken?
So he's a soft marshmallow that you sometimes equip with an iron whip. What if he pick up the whip himself one day and starts moving forward a little to fast? Will you command him to halt,go with him, convince him to re-schedule these big steps he had planned.

As I said, I also want things. But human behavior and emotion is not that structured as we Aspies like to structure our environment and lives.


There's absolutely nothing strange or contradicting about the man she described. My ex was very much like that and we had a beautiful relationship together. I am looking for the same features in a man as well.

Kind, compassionate and respectful doesn't mean one couldn't have strength of character as well. Also my father is a very successful business man and very decisive with life and work, but he is also the nicest and most respectful person one can imagine. He's a very liked and respected person in his field and much loved by the whole family.


Yeah. This describes most of the guys I hang out with. If you think it's impossible to be both a decent person and not a pushover, you're some kind of very messed up.


_________________
Music Theory 101: Cadences.
Authentic cadence: V-I
Plagal cadence: IV-I
Deceptive cadence: V- ANYTHING BUT I ! !! !
Beethoven cadence: V-I-V-I-V-V-V-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I
-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I! I! I! I I I


Who_Am_I
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Aug 2005
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,632
Location: Australia

04 Feb 2014, 11:48 am

Fnord wrote:
JCJC777 wrote:
the common NT woman model is
- have responsible, faithful (dull) man to marry, have kids with, provide for her and her kids
- have some flings with alpha male types when fertile, to get some alpha male kids into the gene pool of the tribe

Stereotype much?

:roll:


Probably has never even SPOKEN TO an NT women.
Making s**t up does not an expert make.


_________________
Music Theory 101: Cadences.
Authentic cadence: V-I
Plagal cadence: IV-I
Deceptive cadence: V- ANYTHING BUT I ! !! !
Beethoven cadence: V-I-V-I-V-V-V-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I
-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I! I! I! I I I


Geekonychus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Nov 2012
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,660

04 Feb 2014, 12:05 pm

@Shau. I'm going to come back to my point about black and white thinking. Getting support from someone (whether it be physical or emotional, romantic or friendly) is not the same as using another person as a crutch. Your one assumption is a very big one. You're just assuming she wouldn't be similiarly supportive and/or couldn't survive without a partner's support. Most can survive perfectly well on their own but it is still nice to have others to lean on when times are tough. That's what a romantic partnership is at it's core.

As for the other bit, MRAs will assume what they want regardless of facts. They always find ways to blame women for everything (including violent things men do like rapes and killing sprees.) Nothing about the way any women poster words anything won't support the vast feminist conspiracy narrative they have in thier heads. You can't appease that which is unappeasable (save for mass genocide of all uppity women) so why try?

Venger wrote:
Geekonychus wrote:
salamandaqwerty wrote:
I think it takes strength to be kind and I can't see why you can't be sensitive and decisive and strong at the same time. It confuses me why people would think otherwise.

I firmly believe the biggest dating obstical people on the spectrum face isn't social skills but black and white thinking. The kind of mindest that convinces a person they either need to be a "super assertive as*hole" or a "complete doormat" and that there's no middleground between the two.



Replace the word in bold with "aggressive".

There's mainly three types of people: passive, assertive, and aggressive ones. "Passive" ones think they have no rights but others do. "Aggressive" ones think they have all the rights and nobody else does. And "assertive" ones believe that everybody has rights, and they represent the moderate middle-ground you speak of.

Makes sense.



JCJC777
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 19 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 396

04 Feb 2014, 12:13 pm

Who_Am_I wrote:
Fnord wrote:
JCJC777 wrote:
the common NT woman model is
- have responsible, faithful (dull) man to marry, have kids with, provide for her and her kids
- have some flings with alpha male types when fertile, to get some alpha male kids into the gene pool of the tribe

Stereotype much?

:roll:


Probably has never even SPOKEN TO an NT women.
Making sh** up does not an expert make.


married to one for 25+ years, many NT women I know, NT daughters etc; does that count?



Shau
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Oct 2009
Age: 166
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,270

04 Feb 2014, 12:21 pm

Geekonychus wrote:
Getting support from someone (whether it be physical or emotional, romantic or friendly) is not the same as using another person as a crutch.


Semantics.

Quote:
Your one assumption is a very big one.


Maybe. If I'm wrong, I'm sure she's more than capable of speaking up for herself, she doesn't need you (or that other guy) to white knight for her.

Quote:
You're just assuming she wouldn't be similiarly supportive and/or couldn't survive without a partner's support.


Actually I'm not. Ironically, you're assuming that's what I'm assuming. I simply stated that failure to say so....well I've already covered that multiple times now.

Quote:
Most can survive perfectly well on their own but it is still nice to have others to lean on when times are tough. That's what a romantic partnership is at it's core.


I have different beliefs, a different outlook on life, and stated my opinion. Do you have a problem with that? If so, feel free to ignore my posts. To add further to the irony, it seems as if you're assuming that's how everyone prefers to conduct their romantic relationships.

Quote:
As for the other bit, MRAs will assume what they want regardless of facts. They always find ways to blame women for everything (including violent things men do like rapes and killing sprees.) Nothing about the way any women poster words anything won't support the vast feminist conspiracy narrative they have in thier heads. You can't appease that which is unappeasable (save for mass genocide of all uppity women) so why try?


Maybe. I avoid feeding the flames either way. For that matter, you're assuming all MRA's are equally-deluded. There's a lot of borderline cases that can still get swayed back into the light.



Last edited by Shau on 04 Feb 2014, 12:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Eureka13
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Nov 2013
Age: 69
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,058
Location: The wilds of Colorado

04 Feb 2014, 12:22 pm

Also, confidence and arrogance are not at all the same thing. This concept goes along with the "aggressive, assertive, passive" scale. Arrogance is aggressive ("here I am, pay attention to me or else!"), confidence is assertive ("I am here"), being a pushover is passive ("I'm invisible").

I've had relationships with all three types. Two of them are exhausting to be around (aggressive and passive); the third is a joy (assertive).

Arrogance can be "in your face" and controlling and completely dismissive of the other person's needs in a relationship (inflexible). Assertiveness can be fully present and engaged and AWARE of the other person's needs (i.e., supportive) without being controlling (aware and flexible). Passivity can mean being fully inwardly focused without ever being aware of what the other person needs (unaware).

In other words, the desirable state, assertiveness, means being confident in yourself and still able to recognize and respect another person's point of view, be aware of their needs, and be willing to allow some flexibility in oneself and others.



Who_Am_I
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Aug 2005
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,632
Location: Australia

04 Feb 2014, 12:24 pm

JCJC777 wrote:
Who_Am_I wrote:
Fnord wrote:
JCJC777 wrote:
the common NT woman model is
- have responsible, faithful (dull) man to marry, have kids with, provide for her and her kids
- have some flings with alpha male types when fertile, to get some alpha male kids into the gene pool of the tribe

Stereotype much?

:roll:


Probably has never even SPOKEN TO an NT women.
Making sh** up does not an expert make.


married to one for 25+ years, many NT women I know, NT daughters etc; does that count?


So this is the type of behaviour you expect from your wife and daughters?
I hope they are aware of what type of husband/father they have.


_________________
Music Theory 101: Cadences.
Authentic cadence: V-I
Plagal cadence: IV-I
Deceptive cadence: V- ANYTHING BUT I ! !! !
Beethoven cadence: V-I-V-I-V-V-V-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I
-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I! I! I! I I I


Geekonychus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Nov 2012
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,660

04 Feb 2014, 12:25 pm

JCJC777 wrote:
Who_Am_I wrote:
Fnord wrote:
JCJC777 wrote:
the common NT woman model is
- have responsible, faithful (dull) man to marry, have kids with, provide for her and her kids
- have some flings with alpha male types when fertile, to get some alpha male kids into the gene pool of the tribe

Stereotype much?

:roll:


Probably has never even SPOKEN TO an NT women.
Making sh** up does not an expert make.


married to one for 25+ years, many NT women I know, NT daughters etc; does that count?

Nice that your wife stuck by you despite your betamale dullness. You must be a good Cuckold for her alpha babies.........:wink:



Shau
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Oct 2009
Age: 166
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,270

04 Feb 2014, 12:27 pm

^ merciless, mate. I approve.