Page 5 of 8 [ 118 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

billiscool
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Feb 2006
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,989

18 May 2014, 1:08 pm

cubedemon6073 wrote:
billiscool and SoftwareEngineer

What the f**k is wrong with you two? Have you two dropped to much acid? You two sound like Beavis and Butthead. f**k Almighty!

I can't even believe I'm reading this BS!. This whole discussion has degraded into some kind of jerky circle jerk. Hale_Bopp is right, neither of you sound very bright.

Can you two think with your brains instead of your dicks?

:evil: I'm f***ing pissed now. Now I know what women are talking about with Nice Guys tm. WTF was I thinking when I was 18-19? You guys are users.


Hey,my Lady friend comes to me.She chooses to be with me.
It's not my fault,she gets turn on by me. Stop blaming me.



starvingartist
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Oct 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,032

18 May 2014, 1:52 pm

billiscool wrote:
SoftwareEngineer wrote:

See if you can derive an operational strategy from my posts above. Perhaps, you can develop into an arrogant inconsiderate self-centered jerk and get the chicks. I tried it once with success. It sounds crazy, but why not leverage your autism. We are already perceived as arrogant, inconsiderate, and self-centered. Adding the jerk part isn't that tough. You can do it! And really, adding the jerk part completes the picture for a successful neurotypical persona. That is, by learning to be a jerk, you might fit in with NTs. They will think you are just another normal jerk.


actual that's How I got my GF(''best lady friend'')back for the
second time.By being a complete douch(jerk)I would just
mock her,and she came back to me.

And she's back with me for the 3rd time.Whenever we ''separate''
I act like ''alpha douche''and whatever reason,she gets
turn on and goes back with me.


appreantly bragging about emotionally abusing people is not violation of TOS on this forum, which i i find interesting. i wonder, if you had bragged about beating her, or raping and killing her, would that be acceptable too? or just emotional abuse is ok i guess?



SoftwareEngineer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Apr 2014
Age: 70
Gender: Male
Posts: 578
Location: Tonopah, AZ, USA

18 May 2014, 2:40 pm

hale_bopp wrote:
billiscool wrote:
SoftwareEngineer wrote:

See if you can derive an operational strategy from my posts above. Perhaps, you can develop into an arrogant inconsiderate self-centered jerk and get the chicks. I tried it once with success. It sounds crazy, but why not leverage your autism. We are already perceived as arrogant, inconsiderate, and self-centered. Adding the jerk part isn't that tough. You can do it! And really, adding the jerk part completes the picture for a successful neurotypical persona. That is, by learning to be a jerk, you might fit in with NTs. They will think you are just another normal jerk.


actual that's How I got my GF(''best lady friend'')back for the
second time.By being a complete douch(jerk)I would just
mock her,and she came back to me.

And she's back with me for the 3rd time.Whenever we ''separate''
I act like ''alpha douche''and whatever reason,she gets
turn on and goes back with me.


Neither of you sound very bright though, I wouldn't use yourself and any girls who you date as a representative of the majority.


Hmmm.

Well, consider this: On occasion, when I have been in bed with a girlfriend and felt a belch coming on, I lean over, blow in her navel, and quickly cup my hand over said navel as if I had caught something. Then, I lean back, raise my hand from her navel, and release the belch - BYAAAAP! Yes, I have simulated trapping my belch in her navel, holding it there, then releasing it. Now, if a boyfriend did that to you, what would be your response? I'm betting you would be mad as hell and love him for it. I'm betting you would think he was a very cute and cleaver jerk. True?

And, I have another stunt. While in the sack with a girlfriend and a couple of cats, I moved my hand under the covers to her tummy and wiggled my fingers. Of course, that drew the attention of the cats and they pounced. Then, in ran my hand up and down the length of her body, wiggling my fingers, and leading the cats in a chase of leaps and pounces. She shrieked, screamed, and shouted. Now, if a boyfriend did that to you, what would be your response? I'm betting you would be mad as hell and love him for it. I'm betting you would think he was a very cute and cleaver jerk. True?

Actually, I have a lot of stunts.

Post edit: Really, I have lots and lots of stunts.

Post post edit: And, I have even more stunts which I save for special occasions.



Last edited by SoftwareEngineer on 18 May 2014, 4:00 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Dox47
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,670
Location: Seattle-ish

18 May 2014, 2:58 pm

starvingartist wrote:
appreantly bragging about emotionally abusing people is not violation of TOS on this forum, which i i find interesting. i wonder, if you had bragged about beating her, or raping and killing her, would that be acceptable too? or just emotional abuse is ok i guess?


I'm surprised to find you making this argument, equating acting like a dick to assault, rape, and murder; it's a bit like arguing that flipping someone off while driving is somehow equivalent to running them off the road and beating them to death with a tire-iron, something so much further along the spectrum that the comparison becomes ridiculous. Bill's description of his actions certainly makes him sound like someone most people would try to avoid, but hardly puts him in the same category of murderers and rapists.


_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.

- Rick Sanchez


billiscool
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Feb 2006
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,989

18 May 2014, 3:20 pm

starvingartist wrote:

appreantly bragging about emotionally abusing people is not violation of TOS on this forum, which i i find interesting. i wonder, if you had bragged about beating her, or raping and killing her, would that be acceptable too? or just emotional abuse is ok i guess?


Hey,she the one's who get mad at me for no reason.Then
she gets happy again and goes back to me.She likes
me.So stop blaming me for her decision.

She gets mad at me,so I act like a ''douche''around her,
for some reason,it turns her on and were back
together a 3rd time.



SoftwareEngineer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Apr 2014
Age: 70
Gender: Male
Posts: 578
Location: Tonopah, AZ, USA

18 May 2014, 3:24 pm

billiscool wrote:
starvingartist wrote:

appreantly bragging about emotionally abusing people is not violation of TOS on this forum, which i i find interesting. i wonder, if you had bragged about beating her, or raping and killing her, would that be acceptable too? or just emotional abuse is ok i guess?


Hey,she the one's who get mad at me for no reason.Then
she gets happy again and goes back to me.She likes
me.So stop blaming me for her decision.

She gets mad at me,so I act like a ''douche''around her,
for some reason,it turns her on and were back
together a 3rd time.


That sounds like a functional proof-of-concept.



sliqua-jcooter
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Jan 2010
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,488
Location: Burke, Virginia, USA

18 May 2014, 3:34 pm

billiscool wrote:
She gets mad at me,so I act like a ''douche''around her,
for some reason,it turns her on and were back
together a 3rd time.


Doesn't sound like it takes much acting...


_________________
Nothing posted here should be construed as the opinion or position of my company, or an official position of WrongPlanet in any way, unless specifically mentioned.


Hopper
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Aug 2012
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,920
Location: The outskirts

18 May 2014, 3:53 pm

Klowglas wrote:
What you just described is most of the world, yes mot guys just want to get laid, but it's also true that most women just want security -- few if anybody really cares about what really mattered most, and hence these sort of threads, the only thing many aspie males can sell is their niceness, but it's just not any good. You can be nice is self-pity, you can be nice and not funny, you can still be nice and a coward, but you just can't be loved/desired, not unless it has some form of power to accompany it.

I'm not obsessed with power, I'm obsessed for the reason why some people end up in my position, if nobody can figure out why I'm here, then that means somebody else is going to fill my shoes eventually. If humans continue to love others based on what they can do for them, and not because they are good human beings, then it's going to be your children/grand-children that will fill my shoes, because many of them wont be as strong or as powerful as others.

I question how powerless you, or most of these couples on this website are but it is something that everyone is going to have to face at some point, because it's something that's going away as we age, a womans beauty is going to fade, that's when her power fades, men lose physical strength, and both of these lose their sharpness.

Many of us 'nice guy' aspies have gone our entire lives without any female friendship, and we're expected to court them with the same sort of guile and confidence of an NT at the top of his game? That's just not going to happen. Many of us can't approach women through social prowess. Our condition makes it hard to get a job, so many of us can't woo them through security, this then leave us with the most base part that makes our being, something that just isn't desired.

Hell, maybe some of you couples just got lucky, that's possible but it's just not something most people can count on.



Oh, I am lucky. But luck shouldn't have anything to do with it, going by your theory. It's all about power, except for the nice guys, who have no power (are they nice because they have no power, or have no power because they're nice?) and so can't get a woman anyway. What's more, there are not that many lucky people in the world, not defined that way. Power, for the vast, vast majority, is relative and rarely had. Most people, definitionally, are average looking. Most people, definitionally, are not at all wealthy. Most people, though, will get some sort of relationship, and will try to make it work, and many times it does.

People love each other for many reasons in the other and themselves. Often, it is something beyond the person - they are loved for their existence. People don't love simply for what their beloved can do for them.

"Most guys just want to get laid" - nope. "Most women just want security" - nope. People tend to the multifaceted and complex.

You are obssessed with power. This is your theory. Your assertion of how the world - at least, romantic relationships - works. And it's all about power. So yes, you're obssessed with power. I've already said there's a kernel of truth in what you say, which is how you can get away with it a bit easier than if you insisted it all came down to who could eat the most molten lava - but it is limited and contextual, and nothing like the whole picture.

You feel you have no power - I say 'feel' here, as whether or not you have power (quite however you're defining it), I wager you'd still feel powerless. For all I know, you do have 'power', but just don't think it so - anyway, you feel you have no power, and you can't get a woman to be romantically interested in you, so you put 2 and 2 together and end up with 367 gazillion, and assume all romantic (and interpersonal) relationships are based on the power of the individuals, and what one partner can get from the other. Which they're not. Oh sure, some are. There's a lot of messed up people out there, a lot of users. You'll notice they get their own particular designation as they deviate from the norm, which is not being a messed-up user.

What power do you think I have? I can be funny ha-ha to/with some people, and sometimes have a knack with a way of putting something. Is being able to make some people laugh 'power'? Being able to talk about overlapping interests with likeminded people 'power'? Being able to be interesting in conversation with some people 'power'? This is a very selective group, by the way - as you can doubtless tell, I'll bore a good 99% of people to tears.

Unless you're trying to stretch 'power' to mean 'any and all attributes that may make a person attractive, be it for friendship or romance, to another'. In which case, you don't lack power so much as any appealing attributes. That you piss and moan about said attributes, thinking the lack of such makes you a 'better', 'virtuous', more 'pure' or 'good' person, is - guess what - pretty unpleasant. You know, not nice.

What's your problem? Is your 'type' limited to the sort who do in fact lust for beautiful, wealthy, economically and socially powerful men and won't consider anything that isn't? Most people fall in love regardless of power. Most people get and stay together, regardless of power.

People are loved because they are good. Not everyone who is good is loved, and not everyone who is loved is good. But people are loved because they are good.

So, because you have difficulty attaining romantic interest from a woman, this means all the relationships I see as I go through the world are based on the power of the individuals involved, and on what each individual can do for their romantic partner.

Please stop going on about how women can 'use' sex to get a man. Do you even realise what you're saying - what the actual, lived experience of a situation like that would involve - and how you sound?

I'm assuming from what you say that you haven't yet had a romantic relationship. That being so, from what do you draw your assertions and suppositions? If it isn't so - what went wrong?

Anyway: pray tell, Clarence, just what it is you and the other aspie Nice Guys do that makes you such darn good people?


_________________
Of course, it's probably quite a bit more complicated than that.

You know sometimes, between the dames and the horses, I don't even know why I put my hat on.


wyrd
Hummingbird
Hummingbird

User avatar

Joined: 28 Apr 2014
Age: 47
Gender: Female
Posts: 19

18 May 2014, 5:21 pm

SoftwareEngineer wrote:
Eureka13 wrote:
Hint: The only way to pull off the "I came over here to eat dinner, not to do dishes" line with a woman who is WORTH BEING WITH is to be actually doing the dishes when you say it. Otherwise it's pure chauvinism, and that doesn't tend to play well with a woman of intelligence and spirit.


I would certainly think you are absolutely right. Like I said, doing so was counterintuitive. But, it worked like a charm. She was of average intelligence and was not what I would call a life learner. However, she was very spirited and outspoken - she really liked playful banter with a sharp edge. Initially, she was distant, complaining I was too complicated and too serious. As soon as I proved my worthiness as a jerk, she warmed up. That was about ten years ago. I got a job far across the country, so the relationship ended and she found another guy. If I'd stayed around, we might still be together. Oh, well.

Post edit: BTW, I didn't need to be a jerk all day every day. One good jerkish stunt every few days kept her tank full. If you've done differential equations, being a jerk is like using a Laplace Transform - you aren't quite sure how or why it works, but with enough experience and success, you do it with confidence.

I wouldnt mind someone saying the dishes thing, Ive got quite a strong personality and I like a bit of fire in the relationship, I want a man who can 'push back'.

I think people need a bit of agitation to make the relationship sexy otherwise it goes platonic.



kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

18 May 2014, 6:03 pm

I believe in a virtuous relationship--like the one between Mary Wollstonecraft and the father of who became Mary Shelley. Intellectual communion turns me on.



naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 71
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,189
Location: temperate zone

18 May 2014, 6:07 pm

starvingartist wrote:
billiscool wrote:
SoftwareEngineer wrote:

See if you can derive an operational strategy from my posts above. Perhaps, you can develop into an arrogant inconsiderate self-centered jerk and get the chicks. I tried it once with success. It sounds crazy, but why not leverage your autism. We are already perceived as arrogant, inconsiderate, and self-centered. Adding the jerk part isn't that tough. You can do it! And really, adding the jerk part completes the picture for a successful neurotypical persona. That is, by learning to be a jerk, you might fit in with NTs. They will think you are just another normal jerk.


actual that's How I got my GF(''best lady friend'')back for the
second time.By being a complete douch(jerk)I would just
mock her,and she came back to me.

And she's back with me for the 3rd time.Whenever we ''separate''
I act like ''alpha douche''and whatever reason,she gets
turn on and goes back with me.


appreantly bragging about emotionally abusing people is not violation of TOS on this forum, which i i find interesting. i wonder, if you had bragged about beating her, or raping and killing her, would that be acceptable too? or just emotional abuse is ok i guess?


Complain to his gf. Not to him.She is the one who rewards him for it.



naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 71
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,189
Location: temperate zone

18 May 2014, 6:17 pm

sliqua-jcooter wrote:
billiscool wrote:
She gets mad at me,so I act like a ''douche''around her,
for some reason,it turns her on and were back
together a 3rd time.


Doesn't sound like it takes much acting...


LOL!

Bill probably didnt have to study under Lawernce Oliver to perfect the role!



XFilesGeek
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jul 2010
Age: 43
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 6,031
Location: The Oort Cloud

18 May 2014, 7:22 pm

Quote:
appreantly bragging about emotionally abusing people is not violation of TOS on this forum, which i i find interesting. i wonder, if you had bragged about beating her, or raping and killing her, would that be acceptable too? or just emotional abuse is ok i guess?


This in the internet. Anyone can pretend to be a "tough guy." I really wouldn't get upset about a bunch of phony online posturing.

It really wouldn't surprise me if certain people purposely exaggerated their supposed behavior in order to try and prove women only date "jerks."

When one of my mother's boyfriends punched her in the face, broke everything in our apartment, screamed that I was a ret*d, and attempted to kill my cat, she called the police and had his a$$ arrested. She didn't fall madly in love with his super-jerk "alpha male" behavior. Apparently, all women do not date jerks. :roll:


_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."

-XFG (no longer a moderator)


marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

18 May 2014, 7:23 pm

Hopper wrote:
You are obssessed with power. This is your theory. Your assertion of how the world - at least, romantic relationships - works. And it's all about power. So yes, you're obssessed with power. I've already said there's a kernel of truth in what you say, which is how you can get away with it a bit easier than if you insisted it all came down to who could eat the most molten lava - but it is limited and contextual, and nothing like the whole picture.

You feel you have no power - I say 'feel' here, as whether or not you have power (quite however you're defining it), I wager you'd still feel powerless. For all I know, you do have 'power', but just don't think it so - anyway, you feel you have no power, and you can't get a woman to be romantically interested in you, so you put 2 and 2 together and end up with 367 gazillion, and assume all romantic (and interpersonal) relationships are based on the power of the individuals, and what one partner can get from the other. Which they're not. Oh sure, some are. There's a lot of messed up people out there, a lot of users. You'll notice they get their own particular designation as they deviate from the norm, which is not being a messed-up user.

What power do you think I have? I can be funny ha-ha to/with some people, and sometimes have a knack with a way of putting something. Is being able to make some people laugh 'power'? Being able to talk about overlapping interests with likeminded people 'power'? Being able to be interesting in conversation with some people 'power'? This is a very selective group, by the way - as you can doubtless tell, I'll bore a good 99% of people to tears.

Unless you're trying to stretch 'power' to mean 'any and all attributes that may make a person attractive, be it for friendship or romance, to another'. In which case, you don't lack power so much as any appealing attributes. That you piss and moan about said attributes, thinking the lack of such makes you a 'better', 'virtuous', more 'pure' or 'good' person, is - guess what - pretty unpleasant. You know, not nice.

What's your problem? Is your 'type' limited to the sort who do in fact lust for beautiful, wealthy, economically and socially powerful men and won't consider anything that isn't? Most people fall in love regardless of power. Most people get and stay together, regardless of power.

People are loved because they are good. Not everyone who is good is loved, and not everyone who is loved is good. But people are loved because they are good.

So, because you have difficulty attaining romantic interest from a woman, this means all the relationships I see as I go through the world are based on the power of the individuals involved, and on what each individual can do for their romantic partner.

Please stop going on about how women can 'use' sex to get a man. Do you even realise what you're saying - what the actual, lived experience of a situation like that would involve - and how you sound?

I'm assuming from what you say that you haven't yet had a romantic relationship. That being so, from what do you draw your assertions and suppositions? If it isn't so - what went wrong?

Anyway: pray tell, Clarence, just what it is you and the other aspie Nice Guys do that makes you such darn good people?

How do you draw the conclusion that he's obsessed with power? I only draw the conclusion that he's unhappy. He has come to the belief that having power is the only way to be loved or attain happiness. Do you think people start to think this way in a vacuum? Maybe it's due to a lot of negative personal experiences. So then, tell me how adding to that negative experience by loading your response with personal put-downs is helping him? Or are you here just to bash people? If that's the case why not focus on the people who post way more offensive stuff?

So far the most offensive thing he's said is that women can 'use' sex to buy love. Unfortunately there are some women who do this, but they don't get love, they get into emotionally abusive relationships with men who want sex and little more. They're just as lonely as 'nice guys' who feel unloved and defective. So I think he's making offensive generalizations out of lack of perspective, not malice. So why bash him and imply he's some kind of misogynistic monster?

I keep seeing a lot of petty and offensive generalizations from the other side as well, namely that men who complain about lack of success in finding a partner are only upset that they can't get laid and see women as sex vending machines. If you're a guy, loneliness and lack of intimacy is dismissed as sexual frustration. As an asexual guy, I find this pretty offensive because I run into the opposite problem, most women do want sex and will reject you if you're not good at it. Most people can't even comprehend the desire to want intimacy without sex being the central component. They really do not get it. It doesn't matter if they're NT or AS, most people have no empathy for anyone who experiences things different from the way they do. So really, is it any wonder people get bitter? Why not go after the real jerks in the world? Why attack misguided people with low self-esteem? Because they're easier to attack? Hmmm... that shows character.

Anyways, it seems like bashing and attacking has become some kind of trendy cliquish activity here in L&D. It looks like the purpose is not so much to make a point as to appear cool somehow. It seems like both "sides" are pretty much into it. I find the whole mobbing and bashing that's become commonplace in this sub-forum pretty despicable. I'm getting fed up with this place and think I have to take a break.



XFilesGeek
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jul 2010
Age: 43
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 6,031
Location: The Oort Cloud

18 May 2014, 7:42 pm

Quote:
I keep seeing a lot of petty and offensive generalizations from the other side as well, namely that men who complain about lack of success in finding a partner are only upset that they can't get laid and see women as sex vending machines. If you're a guy, loneliness and lack of intimacy is dismissed as sexual frustration. As an asexual guy, I find this pretty offensive because I run into the opposite problem, most women do want sex and will reject you if you're not good at it. Most people can't even comprehend the desire to want intimacy without sex being the central component. They really do not get it. It doesn't matter if they're NT or AS, most people have no empathy for anyone who experiences things different from the way they do. So really, is it any wonder people get bitter? Why not go after the real jerks in the world? Why attack misguided people with low self-esteem? Because they're easier to attack? Hmmm... that shows character


When those "misguided people" react to their situation with bitterness and bashing the entire opposite sex, it's not surprising when other people begin to loose their patience.

Personally, I've been on WP for four years, and I get tired of constantly hearing about "how all women think," or "women only date jerks," or women have it "easier", ect. People who complain about a lack of success are not being attacked; the people who use their lack of success to attack other people are, in turn, being attacked. Making offensive generalizations will not garner sympathy. And it's not my job to be kind and understanding towards people who are angry at me because I have two x-chromosomes.

Personally, I just ignore most of it these days, but newer posters, who aren't fed-up with the cycle yet, are still having a go at it. Once they realize they're essentially debating brick walls, they'll find something else to do.


_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."

-XFG (no longer a moderator)


hale_bopp
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Nov 2004
Gender: Female
Posts: 17,054
Location: None

18 May 2014, 8:01 pm

Ferrus91 wrote:
This is true. But it is caring on our own terms. We care about other people when things happen to them that either violate our moral construction of the world, or affect them in a way that, were we subject to the same treatment, we would feel great indignation or pain. Fine. But the key word is genuinely caring about someone else - which means caring about the things that matter to them on their own terms. I find it really hard to sympathise with people's issues unless it is, or could be or world be, actually an issue for me at the outset. Don't misunderstand me - it is undoubtedly a part of what NTs would consider being Nice, but it really isn't the whole deal, it's only a part of the social contract that is implicitly signed in friendships and relationships - and a clause only really enacted in extremis for most NTs.

The nice guy stereotype to my mind simply isn't applicable to most aspies (except in their mind).


I both agree and don't.

I don't give a crap when people post 200 pictures of their child on facebook, to the point where I wouldn't give a crap if I never saw the kid again. This isn't an aspie thing though, a lot of people feel this way.

I'm probably the only person I know who actually gets people birthday presents that they would like, even if I think it's repulsive, opposed to what I think is cool.

I give a lot of sympathy to the hardships of people I know, I offered to go out and get food for someone I live with because she had a wisdom tooth removed.

I don't mind at all for people I know to talk to me about their problems, and I'll do my best to help them.

I'm pretty sure these count as actually caring.