The line between confidence and arrogance

Page 6 of 10 [ 156 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next

anagram
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Nov 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,433
Location: 4 Nov 2012

14 Aug 2016, 5:16 pm

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
That's why you love it.

you know what. fluffy bunnies

Image

(just changing the subject to something more constructive)


kraftiekortie wrote:
I like some aspects of Freudian theory....but he overemphasized the sexual aspect of things.

His round table discussions would have been greater had he got along with people like Jung and Adler.

Freud was too much of a dogmatist.

oh, no, don't get me wrong. freud had some interesting ideas, but he was a loony. i was just using the term loosely


_________________
404


The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

14 Aug 2016, 5:19 pm

kraftiekortie wrote:
I like some aspects of Freudian theory....but he overemphasized the sexual aspect of things.

His round table discussions would have been greater had he got along with people like Jung and Adler.

Freud was too much of a dogmatist.


Freud: Your post reflects you're horny.



kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

14 Aug 2016, 5:27 pm

Sure....I can get horny.

I believe strongly in Erik Erikson, but don't get horny for him.



marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

14 Aug 2016, 9:59 pm

I think the problem is "confidence" is judged as more than self-esteem. Part of "confidence" is social skills. Therefore most autistic people will never be "confident". To be "confident" you need to be able to tell entertaining stories non-stop and make everyone laugh constantly. If you ever stutter or stumble over words you will be judged as "not confident" no matter what you think of yourself. Same if you are "too quiet".



Outrider
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2014
Age: 27
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,007
Location: Australia

15 Aug 2016, 1:26 am

Good to see you here, marshall.

I've seen your past posts on confidence and always found what you say on confidence and such very insightful and intelligent.

I agree confidence does not actually equal social skills.

I've always just seen confidence as 'believing in yourself' - knowing you are capable.

But believing in yourself does not equate to actual skill in something.

Wikipedia sums it up better than I ever could, important parts bolded

Quote:
Self-confidence does not necessarily imply "self-belief" or a belief in one's ability to succeed. For instance, one may be inept at a particular sport or activity, but remain "confident" in one's demeanor, simply because one does not place a great deal of emphasis on the outcome of the activity. When one does not dwell on negative consequences one can be more "self-confident" because one is worrying far less about failure or the disapproval of others following potential failure. One is then more likely to focus on the actual situation which means that enjoyment and success in that situation is also more probable. Belief in one's abilities to perform an activity comes through successful experience and may add to, or consolidate, a general sense of self-confidence


Also relevant and intriguing. Additions in [brackets]

Quote:
Implicit [self-confidence] can be defined as something that is implied or understood though not directly expressed. Explicit is defined as something that is fully and clearly expressed; leaving nothing implied.[4] Implicitly measured self-esteem has been found to be weakly correlated with explicitly measured self-esteem. This leads some critics to assume that explicit and implicit self-confidence are two completely different types of self-esteem. Therefore, this has drawn the conclusion that one will either have a distinct, unconscious self-esteem OR they will consciously misrepresent how they feel about themselves. Recent studies have shown that implicit self-esteem doesn't particularly tap into the unconscious, rather that people consciously overreport their levels of self-esteem. Another possibility is that implicit measurement may be assessing a different aspect of conscious self-esteem altogether.[5] Inaccurate self-evaluation is commonly observed in healthy populations. In the extreme, large differences between oneʼs self-perception and oneʼs actual behavior is a hallmark of a number of disorders that have important implications for understanding treatment seeking and compliance.[6]


So, if I approach women yet am satisfied with the fact I mumble when I speak, don't make enough eye contact, and have stiff/closed-off body language, thus feeling more confident because I don't care if I fail, whether or not I enjoyed the conversation doesn't matter - it won't be seen as 'confident', even if I was believing in myself and believed that these things did not matter.

Ignorance is bliss.

Think of how many Aspies and Autistics may not be aware of their behavior (not making eye contact, stiff body language, odd speaking pattern, fidgety, etc.) and yet they still are capable of speaking to anyone without having regard for how they are coming across and how the other person is receiving their behavior.

Technically, if you believe in yourself, then this still is 'confidence'.

This phenomenon is actually common in people with Asperger's, and tends to be called 'active but odd'.

Quote:
People with AS may not be as withdrawn around others, compared with those with other, more debilitating forms of autism; they approach others, even if awkwardly. For example, a person with AS may engage in a one-sided, long-winded speech about a favorite topic, while misunderstanding or not recognizing the listener's feelings or reactions, such as a wish to change the topic of talk or end the interaction.[17] This social awkwardness has been called "active but odd".[3] This failure to react appropriately to social interaction may appear as disregard for other people's feelings, and may come across as insensitive.


Social skills are still a skill and despite believing in yourself and knowing you are capable, one still has to use skill and tact in their interactions.

In short, confidence is a complicated subject, and Aspies only make it even more complicated and difficult to define.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confidence

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-confidence

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asperger_ ... nteraction



The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

15 Aug 2016, 1:53 am

marshall wrote:
I think the problem is "confidence" is judged as more than self-esteem. Part of "confidence" is social skills. Therefore most autistic people will never be "confident". To be "confident" you need to be able to tell entertaining stories non-stop and make everyone laugh constantly. If you ever stutter or stumble over words you will be judged as "not confident" no matter what you think of yourself. Same if you are "too quiet".


Thank you marshall; you summed what I was telling: They usually refer to social confidence (which requires good social skills),
not overall confidence.

You are in my team.



awkward facepalm
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Dec 2015
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,114
Location: lonely

15 Aug 2016, 2:23 am

both r turn off?

around people in general i would "work on" acting like myrealself



Last edited by awkward facepalm on 15 Aug 2016, 2:24 am, edited 1 time in total.

anagram
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Nov 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,433
Location: 4 Nov 2012

15 Aug 2016, 2:24 am

lol so there's teams now?


_________________
404


rdos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jul 2005
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,096
Location: Sweden

15 Aug 2016, 3:33 am

Outrider wrote:
In short, confidence is a complicated subject, and Aspies only make it even more complicated and difficult to define.


Yes, that's true. Part of this is that if I would approach it in a neurotypical way, I would rarely approach, and if I did, I would stutter, avoid eye contact, leave silence in communication, and appear odd, which would come down to "not confident". However, when I do it with the eye contact game, I appear to be highly confident, which is because I know how to play that game well and I won't be nervous, and I don't have to make conversation or cold approach. I'm also confident in myself, and know myself better than most people, so I have real confidence, yet I wouldn't show that in typical dating.



The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

15 Aug 2016, 4:01 am

anagram wrote:
lol so there's teams now?


Well, there's always two camps in every debate.
Me, rdos, marshall and Outrider seem to have the same stance on the confidence thing: People see the good social skills as good confidence and that what makes difference in the earliest stage of dating.

The other camp (Amity, you, kraftie... ) are of the opinion:
Internal confidence can radiate externally.



Amity
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Mar 2014
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,714
Location: Meandering

15 Aug 2016, 4:28 am

So appearing socially confident is initially significant, but the acting skills are maybe not so useful after the first few dates. Maybe that is why its difficult to tell where the line between confidence and arrogance lies... so is it arrogant to believe that you have good social skills/are socially confident?



anagram
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Nov 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,433
Location: 4 Nov 2012

15 Aug 2016, 4:52 am

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Well, there's always two camps in every debate.
Me, rdos, marshall and Outrider seem to have the same stance on the confidence thing: People see the good social skills as good confidence and that what makes difference in the earliest stage of dating.

The other camp (Amity, you, kraftie... ) are of the opinion:
Internal confidence can radiate externally.

i disagree. i don't think either is the whole story, and i think relying on either principle alone (when you're not "natural" at it already) is bound to fail. internal confidence can radiate externally, but that doesn't answer the question of what confidence is in practice. because: how can it radiate externally? and the answer to that is: social skills. it's really what i've been talking about in this thread so far


_________________
404


rdos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jul 2005
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,096
Location: Sweden

15 Aug 2016, 5:06 am

anagram wrote:
i don't think either is the whole story, and i think relying on either principle alone (when you're not "natural" at it already) is bound to fail. internal confidence can radiate externally, but that doesn't answer the question of what confidence is in practice. because: how can it radiate externally? and the answer to that is: social skills. it's really what i've been talking about in this thread so far


It's not that simple. The connection between confidence and social skills is mostly valid for NTs. It also depends on which method I use to make contact (as I outlined in my own example). Even if I use the eye contact method on an NT, I won't come out as "not confident", rather it will fail on incompatibility instead.



anagram
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Nov 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,433
Location: 4 Nov 2012

15 Aug 2016, 5:15 am

rdos wrote:
It's not that simple. The connection between confidence and social skills is mostly valid for NTs, and it also depends on which method you use to make contact (as I outlined in my own example).

i don't know why people keep telling me that "it's not that simple" when i never said it is. i'm saying the opposite, and it's what i've been saying all along: it is not simple

as for the whole nt/nd duality thing, as if there's any cohesion within each group, it just doesn't fit my personal experience at all. from my own point of view, if there's a meaningful duality when it comes to establishing human connection, it's adhd/non-adhd. even though i do have asd


_________________
404


Last edited by anagram on 15 Aug 2016, 5:20 am, edited 1 time in total.

The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

15 Aug 2016, 5:15 am

anagram wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Well, there's always two camps in every debate.
Me, rdos, marshall and Outrider seem to have the same stance on the confidence thing: People see the good social skills as good confidence and that what makes difference in the earliest stage of dating.

The other camp (Amity, you, kraftie... ) are of the opinion:
Internal confidence can radiate externally.

i disagree. i don't think either is the whole story, and i think relying on either principle alone (when you're not "natural" at it already) is bound to fail. internal confidence can radiate externally, but that doesn't answer the question of what confidence is in practice. because: how can it radiate externally? and the answer to that is: social skills. it's really what i've been talking about in this thread so far


I think you're on something here, good point.



anagram
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Nov 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,433
Location: 4 Nov 2012

15 Aug 2016, 5:19 am

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
I think you're on something here, good point.

high five :)


_________________
404