[25+ Age] L & D Forums for High-Functioning Adult AS?

Post Reply New Topic

I love you , can I marry you?

I do not remember asking you ... this actually irritates me very much.

I asked the OP , it was not a matter of your opinion.

I understand you may have your own personal 0.02 to add but I was not asking for it.

I was attempting to be productive...

-Zane

You know, I have a personal history of trauma and emotional distress from unbalanced males who sexually harassed and stalked me. I'm very uncomfortable with your behavior toward me on this thread along with the fact that you have been posing as "female" with "Feminist" in your rating to avoid continued charges of sexism on this board, and have now apparently targeted me for some kind of self-appointed heated verbal assault.

I think your history of posing as a female with a history of sexism accusations is inappropriate and bizarre. Whatever your agenda is, you meet some criteria that I have established long ago in my self-protective definitions of a male with potentially toxic gender issues.

It seems to me that your posts here on this thread have been intentionally incoherent, illogical and ranting, although I don't know why you would be doing that. I don't have the time to go back and read your posting history to see if this is how you always post, and I think I will get upset if I try to do so.

I have a history of being stalked and sexually harassed by some troubled males. I have a strict policy of blocking people out when I think they've got something weird going on and your profile and strange posts meet my criteria.

A harasser stalker wouldn't set his profile as female and then admit openly that he's actually a male. Anyways, I changed the gender on my profile only recently and I already explained why that for the zillionth time. All old active members here know that I am male, I even posted my own pics in the members section and my pic is listed in the all WP members pics.

Last edited by LePetitPrince on 24 Dec 2008, 7:31 pm, edited 2 times in total.

:Strawberry:

Last edited by Zane on 30 Dec 2008, 7:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.

epherrella never stated or even implied that she was. just that she wanted to talk about stuff with people who are similarly different as she is.

What is it with people wanting to knock people down because they put themselves under a different label than them? "I'm an atheist" "Oh you must go to hell then". People view themselves, in order to make that view known to you they have to use words you and i can understand. Caucassian is a classification, Goth is a classification, Aspie is a classification, High-IQ as similarly a classification.

Why do you persist in bashing people based on classification? Essentially it's the same context as being racist, which is almost the perfect example; the use of stupid human classification in order to define differences themselves and others.

You are correct. My apologies.

No problem friend, these things have been known to happen

I look forward to future discussions

That was a sarcastic comment

Thank you. It takes so much effort just defending your right to have and state ideas that are different from a different view point, here, that one never gets to have a really intelligent conversation on anything controversial or provocative. All the time is spent skirmishing with uncomprehending and offended members of <classifications of gender, i.q. age> other than one's own.

Last edited by ephemerella on 24 Dec 2008, 7:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.

No, it was an honest question, i was actually wondering about that when i wrote my post.

The "Hi I.Q." reference has offended some people who are not, and they may be acting out jealously and angrily.

The poster is attacking me personally using sarcasm. He wasn't saying that you were being sarcastic.

I was referring to my comment and not to your question.

The OP is the one who's labeling people here. (young males , low iq, immature ...etc). Review the title , whole thread before asking this question again.

As about my comment : "oh I am a bacteria ,I didn't rearch your intelligence..." comment-like are all parody against the OP's way of thinking.

So I am a ret*d low-life in denial then ....my IQ must be 10...etc

Argghh . I feel so jealous! If only I can have 1% of your IQ!!

Sarcasm is a negative representation of the truth, non?
I'm still curious though; would you mind answering my question?

"What we have here is a failure to communicate"- Cool Hand Luke

Ok I feel as if I might have begun to realize the problem...

First before I forget it has something to do with being off topic.

Ok now on to the next part:

OP you are upset with both LPP and I for being "uncoherant" correct?

Well, first and foremost ... I am not insulted. It is almost impossible for me to be insulted online. Offended yes, insulted no. And usually when I am offended I tell my ego to take a hike and leave it at that. No need to mix up personal issues with productive solutions

Now I do not speak on behalf of LPP but I do undertsand his side. He actually has gotten on my case a few times for bashing on fat women so do not think of us as allies, more as mutual combatants in the field of life as it pertains to AS. (big words ha-ha)

Ok, in this same light LPP step back a few and breath. The OP does not mean to "attack" you either, she just might not realize how she comes accross in written word. We all are imperfect, on this I know you can relate.

Now, OP I realize you have had a "poor" history with the opposite sex but this is by no means a way to validate your opinions of LPP. LPP is LPP not the douchebags from your past.

We all have a tendency (theory on AS) to associate all neggative experiences into a large ammased whole, representing all of the associated subject matter, however in at least 75% on the case this is a very dangerous and potentially box closing assumption.

LPP changed his gender for one reason and one reason only, he was being attacked from the female side and wished to have easier access to fair judgement.
Now although it certainly isn't a very logical choice in my book, it was an experiment which obviously produced results. As a person interested in social psycology, you can respect this

Now LPP, although I aggree with you on the subject matter, your approach seems a little bit more harsh the needed so my suggestion would be to back up a few steps and possibly if need be stay away from topics which the OP has posted for a bit.

An easy example of something that could have been stopped at the head is this entire topic alltogether, if you look back and re read your posts as well as the OP's replys I am sure you can see what I mean. She did not understand something you could have easily explained in less harsh words, it may not be your style, but neither id mediation for me; sometime we have to do things we do not like.

And now back to the way to fix the forum stuff...

I say this: keep on topic. Make sure it is understood in the OP that the purpose for the topic is to be productive, and then kindly request that this be respected. It may be in our blood to switch catagories and mix everything into one pot but even the most dumbfounded of us AS "guys" can respect a simple request like staying on topic.

Hope this helps,

-Zane

PS: I was not trying to goat you with my comment on "thought policing" ... there is a chance I should have been smarter and realized, there is such a thing as PM's.