Lene wrote:
Chronos wrote:
Lene wrote:
Quote:
Sugar babies outnumber daddies 10 to 1,
This bit made me laugh. Poor old gold-diggers...

Likely because it's free for women to sign up to the site while men have to pay over $40 per month.
Ah, that makes sense.
Quote:
In fact, Seeking Arrangement pays to have its ads pop up on search engines whenever someone types in “student loan,” “tuition help,” “college support” or “help with rent.”
This is a bit sickening though. I do feel sorry for people who can't pay for college... it probably is kind of tempting to take it up if the other choice was getting screwed by the bank...

While I certainly empathize (yes I said empathize) with these girls/women who are trying to obtain an education so they are not trapped in a minimum wage job with which they are unable to support themselves, personally I have an issue with the concept that it should be considered acceptable in society for a woman to meet her financial needs through prostitution, which I define as payment in exchange for sex, even if it's not exclusively sex, in a non-committed relationship devoid of sincere emotional attachment.
If such things do become acceptable in the eyes of society, then sex for money shifts from something a woman who needs money should have a right to do, to something that a woman who needs money is expected to do. In the latter situation, I present you with the scenario that such a society would hold that a single mother with no other means of supporting herself or her children should go out and sleep with men for money, and should she not do this then she is irresponsible.
That is not a standard I wish to have in my society.