Let's to go to Basics: The Concept of Dating

Page 1 of 3 [ 43 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next


What's your concept of dating?
Similar to mine 43%  43%  [ 13 ]
Similar to maku's concept 53%  53%  [ 16 ]
Other, please define : _______________ 3%  3%  [ 1 ]
Total votes : 30

LePetitPrince
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Mar 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,464

25 Mar 2009, 12:34 pm

What's dating?

My concept of dating is this one:

Quote:
Asking a girl out = "I think that I have some feelings toward you , I am interested in you , I see you as potential partner and I want to find out how much compatible we are"


Note that I highlighted 'some' in order to avoid confusion , 'some feelings' here does not necessarily means love and not necessarily a cursh or lust but at least just a basic admiration and chemistry.



And that's the concept of dating for makuranososhi :

Quote:
We disagree on dating, LPP. That hasn't changed. I don't presume that I have 'feelings' for someone when I have asked them out; I have an interest. Curiosity. Desire to know more. Superficial attraction, even if it was only finding the book she was reading to be of interest to me. You continue to identify it with a stronger emotional state, and as long as we have these different standards then you are not going to understand the point of the approach I suggest. Yes, the point is to determine compatibility... and to have a chance to meet people, one has to keep asking and getting to know members of the gender they are attracted to. Let's do a little math - this hypothetical guy asks 20 women out for a date/event each month. What success rate shall we use? 10%? That's 2 first dates per month. Taking it further, the first date will give a sense of whether one or both parties wants to continue the process of getting to know each other - which will have a success rate of less than 50%. So let's say that there would be a second date every other month. That's 24 first dates a year and 6 second dates - not astounding numbers, but at least gives us some numbers to start from. One dates to see if feelings grow; one does not date once feelings have developed... otherwise it will almost assuredly be one-sided as the relationship did not 'grow' together.


So what's your concept of dating?



Last edited by LePetitPrince on 29 Mar 2009, 1:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Zyborg
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 20 Dec 2008
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 459

25 Mar 2009, 12:45 pm

I do not date. If woman is interested in me, she should approach me first.

I am not putting myself at giving position.



Hector
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Mar 2008
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,493

25 Mar 2009, 1:30 pm

I fail to see the distinction between your idea for what dating means and mak's. They are, ostensibly, the same. If there is a difference at all, it's only in standards (as mak refers to). Personally if a girl strikes me as kind of cute or otherwise attractive and we have a great first conversation, I might try to ask her out. Some other guys hold out until they really fancy the person in question, but I don't think that's a good strategy.

Personally I don't think it's at all obvious from your post on dating that your standards are high, but you may have a different notion to mak of what it is to have "feelings" for someone and that could be causing confusion. But maybe you do have high standards and I just haven't noticed.



NeantHumain
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jun 2004
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,837
Location: St. Louis, Missouri

25 Mar 2009, 3:27 pm

If I have even a modicum of desire to get to know the woman better, I'll consider a date. For women, though, getting to know the guy better seems to be a prerequisite to a date, which raises the question of how that happens without a date? I'm out of college now, so I don't run into women (my age, single) on a day-to-day basis anymore; if we don't secure a date when I run into you, chances are I'll never see you again; obviously I'm going to opt to ask for a date.



CrinklyCrustacean
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Mar 2009
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,284

25 Mar 2009, 4:47 pm

My concept of dating is different again: I won't date unless we both fancy each other. Because of this I have never been on a date. If two people are dating, I consider them a couple because otherwise it's just a night out with a friend. Going on a date implies more than that: a special kind of evening out with a definite romantic interest on both sides. There is only one person of the opposite sex I have evening meals out alone with, and that's because of their suggestion. I'm actually very uncomfortable about the whole thing because of my take on what it means to date; it feels quite unnatural. However I can assure everyone I have no romantic interest in them and they do not have feelings for me either. They are a nice person and a good friend, that is all.



Last edited by CrinklyCrustacean on 25 Mar 2009, 4:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Orbyss
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Feb 2008
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 980

25 Mar 2009, 4:51 pm

Hector wrote:
I fail to see the distinction between your idea for what dating means and mak's. They are, ostensibly, the same.


I agree with this.



0_equals_true
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2007
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,038
Location: London

25 Mar 2009, 4:59 pm

LePetitPrince wrote:

So what's your concept of dating?


Don't know. I don't like the idea of formalised dating so I guess I agree with you.

What is not to agree with?

I don't think makuranososhi is that differnt except he is beign too specific. It can't always be like that.



billsmithglendale
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2008
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,223

25 Mar 2009, 6:40 pm

Zyborg wrote:
I do not date. If woman is interested in me, she should approach me first.

I am not putting myself at giving position.


Lol! Well, nothing ventured, nothing gained. You're going to wait a long time for women to break social mores -- they'll make some kind of first move, maybe, but not something so outright as a date. And the ones that do will all tend to be similar, and maybe too aggressive or bossy (or desperate) for your tastes. You're missing out on the shy ones, and let me tell ya, the shy ones are the best!



Zyborg
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 20 Dec 2008
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 459

25 Mar 2009, 7:52 pm

billsmithglendale wrote:
Zyborg wrote:
I do not date. If woman is interested in me, she should approach me first.

I am not putting myself at giving position.


Lol! Well, nothing ventured, nothing gained. You're going to wait a long time for women to break social mores -- they'll make some kind of first move, maybe, but not something so outright as a date. And the ones that do will all tend to be similar, and maybe too aggressive or bossy (or desperate) for your tastes. You're missing out on the shy ones, and let me tell ya, the shy ones are the best!


I do not care. I do not even want relationship.



Hector
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Mar 2008
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,493

25 Mar 2009, 8:29 pm

NeantHumain wrote:
If I have even a modicum of desire to get to know the woman better, I'll consider a date. For women, though, getting to know the guy better seems to be a prerequisite to a date, which raises the question of how that happens without a date? I'm out of college now, so I don't run into women (my age, single) on a day-to-day basis anymore; if we don't secure a date when I run into you, chances are I'll never see you again; obviously I'm going to opt to ask for a date.

I've been quite torn with this, but as you've said the first conversation may be all you have. If you have a really good first conversation and think she's comfortable with you and may have a hard time parting company with you, find an excuse to ask for her number. It doesn't have to be a "date". Having a really good first conversation is rare, but such is life.



BobTheMartian
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 1 Mar 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 264

25 Mar 2009, 8:29 pm

I'm going to agree with the sentiment that you two are just grubbing over details and fine tuning definitions and that you're both pretty much saying the exact same thing.

Personally, I see dating as somewhat of a backwards and overdramatized social ritual that only serves a purpose for shallow NT types. There are two levels of connection, let's call them superficial and deep for simplicity's sake. To have a successful and meaningful relationship, you have to connect on the deep level. Dating, however, provides only an opportunity to establish connection on a superficial level. From personal experience, I've found that those who I can interact with successfully on a superficial level tend to be those who I cannot connect with in a deep level in the *least*, and vice versa. Therefore, dating is somewhat useless for me, as anybody I could date would never turn into a relationship and the people I could have a relationship with are people that I'd never be able to date to the point where establishing a deep connection becomes possible.

I guess the notion is that the idea of dating puts establishing a relationship *before* establishing a deep connection, which I find to be completely backwards. It should be the other way around; relationship based on and flowing naturally from deep connection.


_________________
Only once you have traversed the path of darkness will you come to truly appreciate the light.


makuranososhi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 May 2008
Age: 49
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,805
Location: Banned by Alex

25 Mar 2009, 10:18 pm

The gist of the difference as I understand it is that LPP advocates an approach of selectively asking only females with which he has strong defined feelings - not necessarily love or a crush, as he has said, but generally only after a length of time where one has built up a sense of emotion and belief that there is a future with this person. On the other hand, my approach (when actively dating) has been to ask someone out when I am first attracted to them, and to ask a greater quantity than LPP finds palatable. Whereas he believes that one should have more attachment and deeper feeling for the person before even asking them on a date, I believe that dating is the process through which one develops that attachment and connection leading towards a relationship. If I am wrong, LPP, please correct me. And I acknowledge freely that what works for me will not necessarily work for another.


M.


_________________
My thanks to all the wonderful members here; I will miss the opportunity to continue to learn and work with you.

For those who seek an alternative, it is coming.

So long, and thanks for all the fish!


CrinklyCrustacean
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Mar 2009
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,284

26 Mar 2009, 3:38 am

makuranososhi wrote:
The gist of the difference as I understand it is that LPP advocates an approach of selectively asking only females with which he has strong defined feelings - not necessarily love or a crush, as he has said, but generally only after a length of time where one has built up a sense of emotion and belief that there is a future with this person. On the other hand, my approach (when actively dating) has been to ask someone out when I am first attracted to them, and to ask a greater quantity than LPP finds palatable. Whereas he believes that one should have more attachment and deeper feeling for the person before even asking them on a date, I believe that dating is the process through which one develops that attachment and connection leading towards a relationship. If I am wrong, LPP, please correct me. And I acknowledge freely that what works for me will not necessarily work for another.


M.


So in your case it's much like a job interview: you pick say 5 people who you have a superfiical like for and then choose the best of them?



LePetitPrince
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Mar 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,464

26 Mar 2009, 4:25 am

makuranososhi wrote:
The gist of the difference as I understand it is that LPP advocates an approach of selectively asking only females with which he has strong defined feelings - not necessarily love or a crush, as he has said, but generally only after a length of time where one has built up a sense of emotion and belief that there is a future with this person. On the other hand, my approach (when actively dating) has been to ask someone out when I am first attracted to them, and to ask a greater quantity than LPP finds palatable. Whereas he believes that one should have more attachment and deeper feeling for the person before even asking them on a date, I believe that dating is the process through which one develops that attachment and connection leading towards a relationship. If I am wrong, LPP, please correct me. And I acknowledge freely that what works for me will not necessarily work for another.


M.


100% Correct. Thanks for doing the clarification.



ImTheGuyThatDidThat
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 May 2008
Age: 49
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,170

26 Mar 2009, 5:13 am

Dating in mostly something i see people
do in american movies - if i were to translate
"date" i guess it would be "stevnemøte" and
that just sounds way too....i dont know,
official or something.

I guess if you have no interest in someone
you`re not gonna date them - but if you
have some interest on some level you
might want to do a date to get to know
the person better, or something like that.

Not sure if i have ever been on "a date",
i`ve hung around with people i liked,
but i have never set up a time and a
place and having an official meeting.

So, in conclucion, dating in something
that happens in american movies :)
for me anyway (i`m in scandinavia)



ToadOfSteel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,157
Location: New Jersey

26 Mar 2009, 10:21 am

makuranososhi wrote:
The gist of the difference as I understand it is that LPP advocates an approach of selectively asking only females with which he has strong defined feelings - not necessarily love or a crush, as he has said, but generally only after a length of time where one has built up a sense of emotion and belief that there is a future with this person. On the other hand, my approach (when actively dating) has been to ask someone out when I am first attracted to them, and to ask a greater quantity than LPP finds palatable. Whereas he believes that one should have more attachment and deeper feeling for the person before even asking them on a date, I believe that dating is the process through which one develops that attachment and connection leading towards a relationship. If I am wrong, LPP, please correct me. And I acknowledge freely that what works for me will not necessarily work for another.

I'm with LPP on this one... what's the point in asking out a woman unless there's a chance you have a future with that woman? Asking out women that you haven't taken the time to determine if you're compatible with is dangerous, and also explains the atrociously low success rate you and billsmith keep talking about...

Also, how do you know whether or not the woman is trying to manipulate you for some reason? Most of the time, if women showed any interest in me, they wanted to use me for certain savant skills I have (like addition)... I've rarely felt like a woman actually had any genuine feelings for me... If I get to know the woman before the dating process starts, I can weed out the women that are only interested in my brain power and not me as a person, as well as ruling out the women who are already taken (that's the last thing I need, asking out a woman only to have my ass kicked by her boyfriend that I didn't know she had...)