LGBTQ Identities

Post Reply New Topic

Hello
this thread is for sharing your LGBTQ identity, no matter how 'weird' or lesser-known. find people of the same identity and discuss!
i'm asexual, a lesbian and a demigirl/demigirlflux (not sure lol)

AMAB but would often be misgendered as female based on voice or the way I walk.
Petite size 2 hourglass figure. I like shopping for girl clothes. Shopping for guy clothes used to be a hassle because I had to special order 28in waist pants that were too big for me. But now l can eat more normally and weigh 104 rather than 114 pounds and now have a 24 inch waist for wearing girl clothes.

Not interested guys. Got used to being ignored by girls so I'm busy into my hobbies these days.

I'm cisgender and straight.

My NT sister is cisgender and openly asexual much to the dismay of a pair of paternal uncles who believe that asexuality isn't real, that she's making it all up and that she's using her age to get out of wanting a boyfriend.

I'm 35 and my NT sister is 38. Both uncles enjoy engaging in sexism whenever they visit.

"So, have you found yourself a boyfriend?"

"No."

Next time they visit, I'm going to stay out of the house regardless of what they say.

My NT sister has a strong hatred of men.

Probably forever Questioning... the nature of the beast...

(apparently already old version of) gendercookie way
Identity: pretty much solitary me... Questioning? Autigender is a thing and well... it does have an impact, certainly in the Identity section. Weird. Different. Me... How it is in my head? Certainly at odds, questioning, screaming, crying, sulking... 'sometimes' stubborn (headstrong ). This one always confuses me.

Attraction: I prefer looking at women (preferably not in a too creepy way) but no real sexual attraction. Inspiration? Mostly taste I guess... Perhaps Autigender as well? But is it the reason I can't imagine being that close to anyone is a good thing... I was apparently 'trained to not like people'. Probably easiest 'none' but not entirely true.

Physical/Sex: 'I on a technicality'... Anatomically I am 'none of the above' but 99% male. Usually intersexuality is interpreted as 'both' but definition seems "variations in sex characteristics, such as chromosomes, genitals, or reproductive organs, that do not fit typical definitions of male or female.". I have/had a (very common) extra hole in a part females do not have (i had surgery to prevent problems during puberty)... Never thought it made me intersex. Depending on current political agenda, I am not allowed to downplay and ignore being part of them... or pretend I am one because well... I do not have the real problems associated with being I...

Expression: mostly female... In short: I try. Voice therapy failed (+ also noted some bad vocal habbits people usually do not do out of there own). Hormonal therapy and (partial) facial surgery. My male history just didn't even bother trying any expression... Not exactly dysphoria, just meh...

So... 'officially'... Physical <> Sex: Trans.... (but can an I be anything else? how do you express as an I? neutral?)

Hello, I recently came back and then I decided to tell you all that after going through 10 years of finding myself. I'm AMAB Transfemme and pansexual.

Regarding what you wrote: yes.

Between 4 and 8, I think it was clear to me.
The pansexual part, obviously, wasn't at that age.

<>
Only a three options when registering: I chose the closest one.
Please add a few more, if possible. thank you sir or madam forum!

<>
(I'd basically say: being human.)

<>
Autgender made me smile, written in the post above.

Demi-aromantic, with some biromantic inclinations. Asexual. Non-binary.

Gay / Asexual here.

I really like the descriptions you make.
Because "normal" people (who, let's be clear, don't exist) think they exist, but nature itself cannot foresee them as the only possibility, even personal.

Clearly, the nature of creation, so the discussion could be broadened to something transcendent.
The term transcendence, antithetical to the concept of immanence, derives from the Latin ("trans" + "ascendere" = to ascend beyond) and in philosophy and theology indicates the nature of a reality conceived as further, "beyond" this world, to which it is therefore opposed according to a dualistic vision.

A fresco by Raffaèllo Sanzio depicts Platone.
He is depicted with his left hand pointing to the transcendent.
Plato's gesture indicating the transcendence of Ideas (fresco by Raffaèllo Sanzio , detail from the Stanza della Segnatura in the Vatican Museums).
<>
Clearly, the discussion would go far, far beyond definitions and labels.
<>
Nature does not foresee things like: a brain block , for example.
Always by logic: it foresees two hemispheres, approximately 10% unequal.
Why is this?
Because human beings must survive, perhaps, a stroke.

Let's say the right side is involved...
If it were just a single block, we would perish quickly.
If it were the left: exactly the same thing.

That's why it foresees them as separate, and I use both, I've been training to use both forever.
<>
What happens in human nature?
Certainly not monothematic like heterosexuality.
It would be surreal even to think so.

It foresees countless different possibilities.
<>
Then, okay, people are only attracted to the opposite sex because that's also what nature needs: otherwise, we'd become extinct if everything were the same as it was 70 years ago.

It's clear that a person is convinced of their heterosexuality.
It's clear that they carry it forward by creating families, and children in general.
I'm not Writing about beliefs and how we evolved as a human community.

In fact, if we truly analyze people's histories, we realize that this is not the case.
There are people who are aware of what they are and others who are not at all, that is, those who firmly believe that it is as "Nature" foresees, as they see it.

But they don't know nature.
They have their own unassailable and rigid idea of ​​what nature is, and that's it.

I really like the posts that emphasize that it's not sex intended as an end, but belonging to genders of people, not so much accepted by deniers, and that exist because, among the possibilities, their existence is expressly foreseen.

Look at the latest posts where the word asexual is underlined.
And it is emphasized that it is the human mind that creates mental, psychological attraction with other human beings.

People, be careful because the reasoning like, "There are only us, the right ones, heterosexuals, that they too With sex, they may or may not place it at the center of the emotional relationship or make it emotional and not sexual.

The ending "sexual" is dangerous because it makes people think it's about sex, but it's the mind that makes the difference, nothing else.

Then it's possible that for some people it's just something else.

But they can't decipher the subliminal message at all.

Realizing what it really is isn't that simple: we have an entire society against us!

Is it really a silly society?

I don't identify as either right or left handed. I have better fine motion skills with my left side.
My right side is slightly stronger because we live in a world designed for right handers. But not by much.

Golf is a sport where handedness is a big deal, since most golf clubs are either right or left handed, but not both.
I carry a left handed club to get out of tough spots!

I don't have much of an abstract sense of gender, and it's not something I spontaneously notice when I meet someone for the first time (unless they're broadcasting it deliberately). In itself it doesn't play an active role in attraction for me. It's something I become familiar with as I get to know a person, as part of getting to know them.

Being a woman is something I like and appreciate about myself, but the extent to which I'm conscious of my own gender fluctuates markedly. At times it feels intrinsically relevant... at other times it does not.

(I guess I am a cisgender woman, but I'm unsure of this term and I'd like to know how people in this community relate to it. I've been out of the loop a long time. It's been a long time since I followed the discourse. When is assigned sex at birth a relevant consideration? To me, for now, it seems simpler and clearer just to say I am a woman. But I am always very happy to be educated.)

Gender expression is something I've found complex and confusing. My sense of myself has been a bit malleable, and I am prone to mirroring and absorbing external viewpoints, so I've tended to swing between performative femininity and something a bit closer to neutrality.

I find autigender a useful concept.