Mona Pereth wrote:
One important question is: What portion of self-identified conservatives actually agree with these sentiments?
kokopelli would likely say that these people are not true conservatives, but radical reactionaries. And, in the most literal sense of the word "conservative," he would be correct.
Unfortunately, the radical reactionaries are in power right now. It remains to be seen what all they will do to hold on to power, and whether they will succeed.
Part of the problem is these people control the tent the entire right is camping out under. As long as radical reactionaries/fascists are less offensive to the people under that tent than 'the libs' are, those people will continue to enable the radical reactionaries/fascists.
To quote A.R. Moxon:
Quote:
Historians have a word for Germans who joined the Nazi party, not because they hated Jews, but out of a hope for restored patriotism, or a sense of economic anxiety, or a hope to preserve their religious values, or dislike of their opponents, or raw political opportunism, or convenience, or ignorance, or greed.
That word is "Nazi." Nobody cares about their motives anymore.
They joined what they joined. They lent their support and their moral approval. And, in so doing, they bound themselves to everything that came after. Who cares any more what particular knot they used in the binding?
Likewise, it doesn't matter which knot has bound other self-identified conservatives to the MAGA movement, so long as they continue to support it they're part of the problem. Someday they might attempt to distance themselves from the movement out of guilt and shame but right now they're active contributors to the movement, which makes them part of the problem.
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.