Limit new thread starts to 1 per day, per member?

Page 2 of 3 [ 45 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

anna-banana
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Aug 2008
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,682
Location: Europe

17 Oct 2011, 2:55 pm

Surfman wrote:

Why I care about you guys I dont know


awwwww :]


_________________
not a bug - a feature.


Surfman
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Aug 2010
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,938
Location: Homeward bound

17 Oct 2011, 3:07 pm

velodog wrote:
Surfman, if you find someone else starting more than one thread a day to be annoying than it is you who has a problem. Not the thread starter and not those who choose to post in the threads. At 48 years old you have had plenty of time to learn that the world doesn't work the way you want it to. You could start your own forum and lay down very draconian rules if you want.


I like your gun. :roll:

But I disagree with your opinion, and reaffirm my request to limit inanity, and provide proper boundaries for enthusiastic youngsters, precociously testing their 'power over others' with excessive boring rhetoric....

Unless you really do like the 'young, dumb, and full of cum' kind of thing...

Personally, I'm now gone in spirit from this place, and place little importance either way.

I would be more active on WP if it provided a cerebral atmosphere....I tried starting an intelligent thread a few times, but threads like South Park gets way more traffic

I suppose I should just leave the pigs to roll in mud on their own....pigs like mud

'Do not cast ones pearls before swine....'

yes, its not my problem, never has been :D

I guess I'm different from many here :D



velodog
Gold Supporter
Gold Supporter

User avatar

Joined: 15 Mar 2008
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,374

17 Oct 2011, 7:10 pm

Surfman wrote:
velodog wrote:
Surfman, if you find someone else starting more than one thread a day to be annoying than it is you who has a problem. Not the thread starter and not those who choose to post in the threads. At 48 years old you have had plenty of time to learn that the world doesn't work the way you want it to. You could start your own forum and lay down very draconian rules if you want.


I like your gun. :roll:
Thanks, that's James Woods playing Max Renn in Videodrome using a PPK.
Quote:
But I disagree with your opinion, and reaffirm my request to limit inanity, and provide proper boundaries for enthusiastic youngsters, precociously testing their 'power over others' with excessive boring rhetoric....
There are a whole lot of children and young adults here. They have interest in things like anime, manga, gaming and music that I don't care for. But why shouldn't they discuss what interests them?
Quote:
Unless you really do like the 'young, dumb, and full of cum' kind of thing...

Been there, done that. I am 4 years older than you.
Quote:
Personally, I'm now gone in spirit from this place, and place little importance either way.

Apparently it is important enough for you to start this thread.
Quote:
I would be more active on WP if it provided a cerebral atmosphere....I tried starting an intelligent thread a few times, but threads like South Park gets way more traffic

Having different interests does not make them less intelligent than you.
Quote:
I suppose I should just leave the pigs to roll in mud on their own....pigs like mud

'Do not cast ones pearls before swine....'

Casting aspersions on others because they prefer to talk about their own interests does not show a great deal of maturity. Shake the dust off your sneakers and move on.
Quote:
yes, its not my problem, never has been :D

I guess I'm different from many here :D

Intensity Squared has an older aspie demographic than here. You might find it more to your liking. Just click the name and you'll be there.



Surfman
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Aug 2010
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,938
Location: Homeward bound

18 Oct 2011, 1:08 am

Thanks for the link! However, I scrolled around the site a bit....looked kinda dubious then I saw the popularity of the: 'I want to f**k Sarah Palin' thread, then I knew why I avoid most people, in real life and on line.....





I have no trouble with young peoples expressions of interest, be it anime, manga or whatever, but rather members who 'think aloud' on WP, and start multiple threads daily.....
I guess you lot are happy with the current situation, so I'll leave you to it then :arrow:

I still believe it is antagonistic to all parties concerned, including writers...... to leave youngsters to run amok without healthy boundaries....but I guess thats now common in todays world....though I do believe healthy respect for other members cybertime is extremely lacking by WP management.

That will be your cross to bare



hyperlexian
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2010
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 22,023
Location: with bucephalus

18 Oct 2011, 10:00 am

Fnord wrote:
What bugs me about this is when a new member posts the same OP in several different forums because they want to be sure that someone will respond. A recent cluster of threads on oxytocin comes to mind.

this breaks the rules and it annoys me greatly. i don't mind if you pass that on so i can remove one thread. i don't always catch it.

EDIT: Surfman, i also don't like if people start multiple threads all in one day, especially if they are inciteful (i.e. just an external link then that OP abandons the thread to the wolves), or if someone posts a lot of topics in a day without a lot of thought going into them. if it gets out of hand it can be considered spam and we can speak to such individuals, but we need to know specific instances if people think it is going too far.


_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
viewtopic.php?t=391105


jackbus01
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Feb 2011
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,197

18 Oct 2011, 10:14 am

hyperlexian wrote:
Fnord wrote:
What bugs me about this is when a new member posts the same OP in several different forums because they want to be sure that someone will respond. A recent cluster of threads on oxytocin comes to mind.

this breaks the rules and it annoys me greatly. i don't mind if you pass that on so i can remove one thread. i don't always catch it.


Yeah, I have seen some cross-posting a few times. I will try to report it if I see it. I think there was a recent one on South Park.



Moog
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Feb 2010
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 17,671
Location: Untied Kingdom

18 Oct 2011, 11:47 am

hyperlexian wrote:
Fnord wrote:
What bugs me about this is when a new member posts the same OP in several different forums because they want to be sure that someone will respond. A recent cluster of threads on oxytocin comes to mind.

this breaks the rules and it annoys me greatly. i don't mind if you pass that on so i can remove one thread. i don't always catch it.


I had a chat with the Oxytocin fellow and told him to stop the spam... I didn't remove the threads though, as they were worth keeping (it wasn't their fault they got the spam treatment), and given a few hours, they were already falling off of the front page again.


_________________
Not currently a moderator


hyperlexian
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2010
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 22,023
Location: with bucephalus

18 Oct 2011, 12:17 pm

Moog wrote:
hyperlexian wrote:
Fnord wrote:
What bugs me about this is when a new member posts the same OP in several different forums because they want to be sure that someone will respond. A recent cluster of threads on oxytocin comes to mind.

this breaks the rules and it annoys me greatly. i don't mind if you pass that on so i can remove one thread. i don't always catch it.


I had a chat with the Oxytocin fellow and told him to stop the spam... I didn't remove the threads though, as they were worth keeping (it wasn't their fault they got the spam treatment), and given a few hours, they were already falling off of the front page again.

your wording made me lol (those poor threads!).


_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
viewtopic.php?t=391105


Surfman
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Aug 2010
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,938
Location: Homeward bound

18 Oct 2011, 1:50 pm

hyperlexian wrote:
your wording made me lol (those poor threads!).


My cross is I that care too much, also for poor threads!

Astrology says: 'not only does this native care about everything solid, traditional and valuable, he also enjoys the capacity to care for those elements'



Meow101
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Feb 2010
Age: 63
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,699
Location: USA

21 Oct 2011, 7:39 pm

Sometimes people have more than one (or two) interesting things to say in one day. Sometimes you can tell by the title of a thread (like do aspie farts smell worse than nt farts?) that you don't want to read it. There are some posters I don't read. I don't see the need to limit numbers of posts unless it rises to the level of spam.

~Kate


_________________
Ce e amorul? E un lung
Prilej pentru durere,
Caci mii de lacrimi nu-i ajung
Si tot mai multe cere.
--Mihai Eminescu


sliqua-jcooter
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Jan 2010
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,488
Location: Burke, Virginia, USA

21 Oct 2011, 10:57 pm

There are various technical reasons limits shouldn't be imposed also.

Well, first of all, there's the technical complexity involved in building that functionality into the code base of the forum, and the implications that carries on to the overall maintainability of the site.

Secondly, there are many valid reasons someone may want to start multiple threads in a short amount of time. Just as a simple example, I generally lurk around this sub-forum looking for people reporting issues that may have to do with the server, as I have the ability to fix those issues.

If there's a thread that deals with something I may have an interest in, I'll watch it for replies. If people were limited to posting X threads per day, they'll end up reporting multiple issues in posts in existing threads, or threads that don't have anything to do with what their issue is, and I'll completely miss those issues and won't know about any problems that people are experiencing.

It seems to me that any time you implement a rule like that, people end up finding ways around those rules that make things worse off than they were before. If user X can't start his random thread #23, they'll end up poisoning someone else's thread instead.



Surfman
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Aug 2010
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,938
Location: Homeward bound

22 Oct 2011, 8:51 am

sliqua-jcooter wrote:
If user X can't start his random thread #23, they'll end up poisoning someone else's thread instead.



I disagree that this is an absolute scenario

Aspies are blurters who need to learn to STFU FACT

If counsellors at support meetings I attended took the time to tell the yapping young male aspies to STFU, they would have done way more good for verbal diarrhoea afflicted souls

Learning not to be a blurter is hardly discouraged is it?
And everyone logging on is party to the dysfunction :?
its almost encouraged :? :?



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,943
Location:      

22 Oct 2011, 9:01 am

Surfman wrote:
Limit new thread starts to 1 thread per day, per member?

It won't happen.


_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.


Moog
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Feb 2010
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 17,671
Location: Untied Kingdom

22 Oct 2011, 9:17 am

Surfman wrote:
sliqua-jcooter wrote:
If user X can't start his random thread #23, they'll end up poisoning someone else's thread instead.



I disagree that this is an absolute scenario

Aspies are blurters who need to learn to STFU FACT

If counsellors at support meetings I attended took the time to tell the yapping young male aspies to STFU, they would have done way more good for verbal diarrhoea afflicted souls

Learning not to be a blurter is hardly discouraged is it?
And everyone logging on is party to the dysfunction :?
its almost encouraged :? :?


I think you're making the error of thinking that your own experience and your perception of what a couple of other prolific posters round here need 'FACT' are synonymous with what every aspie needs.

I heartily disagree with "Aspies are blurters who need to learn to STFU FACT"

Many aspies learn to STFU on their own accord, upon realising that the world doesn't understand or appreciate what they have to say.

Here should be the place where people are free to start communicating again.

That there is one or two nuisances that really do take liberties and stretch the bounds of acceptability is not in doubt, but I don't think reason enough to institute the measure you desire.

Perhaps what some aspies need to learn to do FACT is to have a little tolerance.


_________________
Not currently a moderator


Surfman
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Aug 2010
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,938
Location: Homeward bound

22 Oct 2011, 11:01 am

Other forums that are NT, have them too I guess

Maybe it could be just me.... sorry to offend multiple thread starters and their fan boys

My apologies



OneStepBeyond
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,310

22 Oct 2011, 11:03 am

lol surfman you're such a b***h