People have their "personality colors" or animal forms
funeralxempire
Veteran
Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 34,202
Location: Right over your left shoulder
My animal form is H. sapiens. ![]()
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.
When I create characters, I assign a colour to them as a shorthand for personality on a superficial level. I use it as a starting point. This tends to influence initial sketches of their clothing but I later branch out to using different colours. However, I'll still keep an item of their assigned colour on their design such as a red hair tye.
However, I don't have synesthesia or anything like that. I just like to use colour theory as a way to get started.
_________________
Support human artists!
Near the spectrum but not on it.
funeralxempire
Veteran
Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 34,202
Location: Right over your left shoulder
Mexica? Creek? Wyandot?
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.
Mine is patterns.
Non visual, non verbal "visceral pattern" that may run across my body or if I can feel electric signals in my brain -- but is sort of labeled as if they're archetypes, that it feels more like if numbers visual symbols have textile feelings, and if number tone dials are visual than auditory instead.
I cannot describe it.
I don't think the concept itself is so special.
And mine is just more difficult to translate into something that others will likely understand.
I wouldn't doubt that others will think I don't have it out of sheer lack of expression over it.
_________________
Gained Number Post Count (1).
Lose Time (n).
Lose more time here - Updates at least once a week.
I have all the novels by L. M. Montgomery on my shelf, the Story Girl books including
I didn't have "Anne's House of Dreams" (if that's the original title of it in English) one until quite recently but some time ago my mom found near the dumpster a set of books lying around and there were also some novels by Mrs. Montgomery among them ![]()
This is so fascinating, Irulan.
Does this ever happen through a screen, or do you need real-life familiarity? It sounds like we would end up with two completely different animals, but I am finding it fun to think about possible overlap between the associations that form for for you and how people imagine their own animal selves.
People have often thought *symbolically* through animals, individually or culturally. In some early poems this is accompanied by extremely vivid sensory associations. I know you write fanfiction but do you ever write poetry?
I do not have the thing where I see peoples aura and color. I have a thing where shapes can show me things but its in frequency and physics, not math. Its like a forest.
Last edited by Keeper of the Garden on 17 Jan 2026, 10:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
Also Irulan, I think I know why you do this. This has been explained to me by professionals, it sounds like its the same thing. Those with deep cognitive abilities that think in heavy systems, can often replace identity markers with something more simple than a spelled out name, like a shape, color, or animal. Animals actually work much better for many identity nodes because there are many animals, but shapes and color availability is limited. Because you identify people with animals, you can think in deep systems without your brain having to stop and spell out each name. OR the brain can use identity symbols to better store information without the heavy systems. Its simply a better method of storing identity than names, which the human brain is not capable of holding the names of all the people we meet in life.
Yet I do have certain sensation or feeling like patterns associated in many sorts of personalities.
And without any labels to put them into.
But yeah. I do. Minus seeing colors or associating them with animals.
But I can and try to attribute it to a color though -- a lot of associations do not have colors or is outside the colors' spectrum.
I usually associated certain people with a collection of other people -- fictional, non fictional...
Like some sort of spectrum, with endless images and 'movements and moments' as a 'label'.
A lot of them I don't know who they are or what those movement means.
Kinda like some form of sorting by archetype, behaviors, tone like patterns of order.
Heck, I'd even recognize other people through 'this' than their name.
And if I try to describe mine??? Mine is chaotic.
It doesn't match with what I'm in my mind or what and how I want to be.
An update over a year later;
It seems that I have two modes for people; a story or an interface.
A story meant it's someone I get to know and learn overtime.
An interface meant someone I had to react to and utilize to.
Some stories are more engaging, some are more boring... I'd likely form attachments in a more voluntary sense towards the person 'as characters' in whatever story they're a part of. And interacting with them can feel quite a privilege that I'm honored to be apart of.
And then there's interfaces... Either are important or annoying... Or both. And any attachments born from this isn't very voluntary nor desirable. I'd likely form trauma bonds from that than something meaningful. And having to interact with them feels like some sort of psychological zero sum game that I do not enjoy being in it.
So yeah...
Upon 1st impressions, a person either goes to two different categories.
Collections of associations of other people I learned meant they're a part of some story I get to know and learn over time. Like they do remind me of whoever, and didn't matter if I like them or not.
.. Or are more like alarms and bleeps that I'm trying to figure and make most out of. I don't think I see them as 'people' this way, regardless if I like them or not.
Not all is black and white of course. Tho, I struggle to see someone being both.
But one thing is most certain; most of early childhood, I just see people as interfaces. Only at later childhood I'm seeing people akin to stories. Developmentally speaking, that seems to be congruent.
May explain why I have preferences towards meeting people later and later in life; I tend to perceive them more like stories than interface.
May also explain why I don't like my parents that much; they don't register as 'stories' for me to get to know, but are interfaces I had to navigate. It doesn't matter how or why; I don't get 'curious' of what's the story behind who or what my parents are because they're more like interfaces that I was forced to be enmeshed over.
_________________
Gained Number Post Count (1).
Lose Time (n).
Lose more time here - Updates at least once a week.
I know you write fanfiction but do you ever write poetry?
Oooh, I see that the thread got resurrected after I gave the link to it in another thread
And no, I don't write poetry at all - well, sometimes but extremely rarely I write short, simple children's poems to enter them in online contests
I can't see other people's aura but once I was told by some reiki master with paranormal powers that my own aura is pale yellow which is the color of people with a high level of intelligence
I'm very grateful to you for explaining to me the potential reason standing behind this particular feature of my personality. I indeed have deep cognitive abilities as you called it - it was visible ever since I was a very young child. But I am actually very good with remembering people's names, especially that in Poland the name pool is quite limited - people with rare names also happen very rarely. I indeed do tend to think in systems, I like to analyze relationships, dynamics and roles and generally perceive people as elements of larger structures so I think it's all about compressing information. Instead of storing like twenty separate traits about one person, my brain creates an identity symbol - you know, such a cognitive shorthand. An animal or a color becomes then to me an information node or a bundle of traits, in other words, an “icon” of the person within the system. This allows my brain to perform faster and deeper thinking without overloading the working memory. I at least think now it could be caused by this
P.S. I'll ask my psychologist one day if she ever heard about a similar phenomenon - btw, she is a sandy and pale green meerkat to me ![]()
CockneyRebel
Veteran
Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 121,048
Location: In my own little country
I forgot to ask her about it today
