The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
It's because Autism still lacks an "ORGANIC decisive diagnosis" - as long it remains only a psychiatric/psychologist diagnosis, its meaning will remain ...weak - just a shallow identity with no strong scientific basis; unlike other disorders that have definitive ORGANIC diagnosis (known specific mutations), such as Rett's Syndrome and Down's syndrome - no normie can claim those.
I have come to think that autism is a deficit in one's ability to process sensory input, but it manifests in differing ways depending on the individual, and varies in intensity. But what matters is how does it affect an individual — do they need some sort of support where a normie does not? That's what matters. Not the accuracy of the diagnosis. Although based on the premise I just put forward, I can imagine some sort of standardized test could be devised. Might be a good topic for somebody's doctoral dissertation.