ezbzbfcg2 wrote:
Wouldn't NTs also be considered "neurodiverse" and part of humanity's "neurodiversity" ??
Every human being has some sort of neurological wiring. The term is usually used to mean non-NT. But, as NT is a neurotype in its own right, it's part of the "diverse" neruological wiring of human beings.
So, it sort of defeats the purpose.
Neurodivergent (as in divergent from the NT norm) would actually be a more accurate term.
Me personally? I'm just a sperg.
Well I think when people say "neurodiverse" we do actually mean "neurodivergent".
10 Feb 2026, 11:59 am
