Cornflake wrote:
Rather than drag this thread into a discussion/bashing of feminism - or more accurately in this case, what feminism is mostly not - please keep to the topic.
Understood, although I'm not sure the article as presented is coherent enough to serve as anything more than a jumping off point.
I could speculate on the underlying issues that may be a manifestation of the problems the author observes, but analysing the social structures of Western civilization in relation to sexual (dys)function may bring the discussion straight back around... I probably skipped forward a bit. Goes with the territory.