An Open Question To Anti-Gays: What Is Wrong With It?

Page 6 of 6 [ 84 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Krokusfan88
Emu Egg
Emu Egg

User avatar

Joined: 19 Oct 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 7

20 Oct 2011, 7:34 pm

hyperlexian wrote:
Krokusfan88 wrote:
hyperlexian wrote:
Krokusfan88 wrote:
False. Homosexual reproduction cannot be done so in nature as it takes genetic material from both male and female chromosomes to spawn. Therefore, only heterosexual coitus garners the ability to pass on parental lineage. Homosexuality itself, is the antithesis of evolution it seems.

... except that homosexual people can, and do, parent children. regardless of who their partner is, each individual can pass on their own genetic information. they may choose not to do so, just like heterosexuals may make that choice. they have no biological restriction on continuing their lineage, and many do make the choice to become parents.

you must have a better argument than that one, as it doesn't hold up under a faint glance, much less intense scrutiny. :lol:


I never denied that. Homosexual couples in bane of traditional heterosexual couples, claim to naturally possess the same ability to reproduce... but can only be achieved through an intermediary of the opposing sex. Only passing on half of the couples genes. It would totally make for great talk-show television for us all to enjoy in the long run.

good, we are in agreement then; homosexual people are not biologically defective.


I'm not defiler, regardless of what has been said.

I don't think gays are biologically defective. I believe there is a very small fraction that are genetically determined to be gay, most likely from a dual mechanism that creates sterile labor in the way that an ant colony includes different kinds of workers and warriors, or creates it if there would be problems with the individual in question breeding. These people tend to be the most natural, as their main concern is having a normal life while fitting love and sodomy into it.

There are also imitators, that through popular/social influence have chosen to be gay based on what they've perceived as immediately pleasing through others, they tend to digress into two groups.. misguided through some form of abuse in their past, and openly visible perverts... The former comprised of still legitimate individuals with a latent genetic disposition for homosex, and the latter being comprised of absent minded, sex addicts who oscillate their orientation in favor of whatever is available. These people are in the category of nymphomania and satyriasis...



hyperlexian
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2010
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 22,023
Location: with bucephalus

20 Oct 2011, 7:47 pm

Krokusfan88 wrote:
I'm not defiler, regardless of what has been said.

if you are not Defiler, then how are you famiiar with that individual? it isn't chance that brought you here en masse to rile up the aspies. presumably you are acquainted on another site. which one is it?


_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
viewtopic.php?t=391105


Krokusfan88
Emu Egg
Emu Egg

User avatar

Joined: 19 Oct 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 7

20 Oct 2011, 8:04 pm

hyperlexian wrote:
Krokusfan88 wrote:
I'm not defiler, regardless of what has been said.

if you are not Defiler, then how are you famiiar with that individual? it isn't chance that brought you here en masse to rile up the aspies. presumably you are acquainted on another site. which one is it?


Why is that important anyway? If this Defiler and I happen to share similar opinions, then so be it. I come here in solitude! Just because I happen to possess an outspoken opinion as others here have, that doesn't invalidate the opinion just because it's unpopular.



hyperlexian
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2010
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 22,023
Location: with bucephalus

20 Oct 2011, 8:27 pm

Krokusfan88 wrote:
hyperlexian wrote:
Krokusfan88 wrote:
I'm not defiler, regardless of what has been said.

if you are not Defiler, then how are you famiiar with that individual? it isn't chance that brought you here en masse to rile up the aspies. presumably you are acquainted on another site. which one is it?


Why is that important anyway? If this Defiler and I happen to share similar opinions, then so be it. I come here in solitude! Just because I happen to possess an outspoken opinion as others here have, it doesn't invalidate the opinion just because it's unpopular.

some advice: if you want to feel a warm welcome here, try introducing yourself in the applicable subforum and make an effort to be supportive of aspies on their threads here - including homosexual aspies. this isn't a random site for arguments; it is a support forum and you are expected to act accordingly. if your intention is to create problems and flame us, you will wear out your welcome very quickly. this is not a board for random flaming and nastiness - we are inclusive and expect you to behave in a manner that does not belittle or provoke other members.

i do not think you would like it if WrongPlanet members came over to your other site and trolled you over there with inflammatory arguments and other nastiness. obviously, if you didn't mind people doing that you would have already told us what site you are from so that WP members could do exactly that.

ultimately, you are expected to treat WrongPlanet members with respect.

this conversation is over. the thread was ill-advised to begin with, and there is no sense in carrying on.


_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
viewtopic.php?t=391105