Michael_Stuart wrote:
Additionally, it seems somewhat of an awkward requirement. How would you determine whether someone was allowed to join or not? There's plenty of self-diagnoses, and it seems like discrimination. A fraternity of like-minded people would be possible though, and might get enough members to be viable if not very big.
That's what 95% of fraternities are. Groups of "like-minded people". Those who are not "like-minded" are not allowed.
When I was in college I was in a fraternity, and I joined it because it was actually a group of people who were NOT like-minded; I didn't know things like that existed, and I was amazed. It was awesome--until a couple years later a group of coincidentally like-minded people had joined that was large enough to basically take over and turn it into your basic meat head frat.
There seems to be a strange commonality (and maybe one of the only ones that exists) between people with AS and the most stereotypical, hyper-social NTs--an intense desire to only associate with people who are as exactly alike as possible. This is probably why it gets tossed around here all the time that someone responds in a particular way that differs from "the norm", and someone else comes back with "there's no way you have AS".
I wholly reject this mode of conduct, but it's not my place to tell people how to live their lives and construct their social circles.
_________________
I know I made them a promise but those are just words, and words can get weird.
I think they made themselves perfectly clear.