pandabear wrote:
I'd watch it, if they had any decent sex scenes.
If it follows the book, there should be.
And this is what I hate. Invention is creation. And you can't make a dime off invention unless there is some social benefit, even if it is kitchy and has nothing to do with medicine and is only leisurely pursuit, like say, an i-pad or something. If people don't want it, you won't make money. Funnily enough, people want reliable electricity and steel that doesn't fail and trains that run on time. I wonder, will you read the book and then actually deconstruct the inherent nobility of the phrase
"Money is made... Made by honest men, each according to his ability"
And, of course,
"So, you say money is the root of all evil?... Have you ever wondered what is the root of all money?"
We hate industrialists because they made money. Ayn Rand, and I, hate Robin Hood because he said it's okay to take money from the rich for no better reason than you're poor, and that the rich should just take it, because they're productive.
I mean, really, don't you see with your eyes? Being poor doesn't entitle you to the wealth that someone else legitimately made, and that was never STOLEN from you. If you never had it, how was it stolen? Answer me that. Especially when you live in the same country with the same opportunity to make the same money in the same way as the alleged Robber Baron made it off of your indolence and indifference and entitlement to something you could otherwise make if you bothered to invest of yourself.
Try it some time. Remove the ideology and what do you have? America as still the most innovative nation on Earth with the highest endowment of intellectual capital. Such is why America is still the richest nation on Earth.
China steals, it doesn't innovate. How can you support such an ignorant position? John Galt, love him or loathe him, was right to do what he did. The Left said they didn't need the Industrialist's mind in order to produce. They lived in a world without causality, only effect. If you took the causality away, the Industrialist, it won't take away his achievement or production. That wasn't what they were doing. Didn't he see that? No. He didn't. So, he took them all away. And what happened? The world collapsed.
SIGH!
You'll never listen, neither will you agree with me. But, maybe 91 was right when he PM'ed me, telling me I should set up a thread in defence of Ayn Rand. It amazes me that people will accept wealth for no reason and then denigrate those that make it of their own accord. Just because you're poor or not as smart as someone else, doesn't entitle you to wealth or someone else's achievement. I would have thought that, especially in such an enlightened age as ours, that this was standard fare of moral responsibility throughout the Western World...
_________________
Oh, God, cleanse me of sins I do not perceive, and forgive me those of others.
- Pascal Bruckner