Currently reading Her Fearful Symmetry by Audrey Niffenegger

Page 1 of 1 [ 6 posts ] 

whiterat
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 3 Aug 2011
Age: 37
Gender: Female
Posts: 280
Location: Singapore

07 Oct 2011, 1:50 am

And there are some parts I don't quite understand.

Julia is the older Poole twin. She's protective of her sister Valentina, whom she calls "Mouse". As the twins were preparing to go to London, Valentina sewed two identical violet dresses. She mentioned to her mother,Edie, that "Julia wanted me to make them in pink." Edie said that "We could have made hers pink."

Quote:
Valentina caught her mother's eye, then looked away. "It wasn't worth the hassle. She wanted whatever I was making for myself."

After that Edie encourages Valentina to stand up for herself.

But going back to the chapter "The Mirror Twins" where they are introduced, it is mentioned that
Quote:
They had originally matriculated at Cornell; Julia had stopped attending classes in the spring semester, and when she was asked to leave Valentina came home with her. At the University of Illinois they'd lasted a year, but Julia refused to go back.


When the Poole twins got to London and met their solicitor, they had this exchange:
Quote:
Valentina said, "Can we work here?"
"You don't have the proper visas, but we can certainly apply. What sort of work do you do?"
Valentina said, "We aren't sure yet. But we are planning to go back to school."
"Actually, we are done with school," said Julia.

Comparing against what is written about their university education, it seems that Julia is the one who usually drops out of school. Only now do we hear about Valentina asking about either going back to school or getting a job, neither of which the Poole twins were doing just before they heard about their Aunt Elspeth's death.

Now about the earlier generation of twins, Edie and Elspeth. The solicitor, Mr Roche, said that "Elspeth often kept her own counsel." The Poole twins' father, Jack, was apparently engaged to Elspeth, but Edie ran away with him to US. Looks like Elspeth was the quiet one, like Valentina, and Edie the one who does things, like Julia. At the moment I don't know who's older.

On a minor note, when the twins ask Edie about their Aunt Elspeth, and Edie shows them the passport record of their going to London to visit her, it is written that
Quote:
Edie came back with two American passports. She handed one to Valentina and the other to Julia. They opened the passports, stared at themselves. It's weird to see new baby pictures. (italics from the original text)

The Poole twins are 20 at this point in the story, so those baby photos were probably taken about 19-20 years back. So the photos won't be "new" in the sense that they were just taken. Could the word "new" be used because the girls are seeing these photos as older youths?

Once they arrive at Heathrow, they handed over their "virginal passports". I interpret from here they got new passports for this trip. Julia told the woman at the counter they were staying "forever" because of they inherited a flat, although what the will says is that they must stay in the flat for 1 year before they can sell it (if they choose to sell the flat, that is).

I find their choice of suitcases interesting.
Quote:
Julia's suitcase was pink and yellow terry cloth, and had a Japanese cartoon-monkey face that leered at the people walking behind her. Valentina's blue-and-green suitcase's cartoon face was a mouse. The mouse looked both regretful and shy.

This reinforces the impression I have of Julia being pushy (bright colours + leering monkey face), and Valentina being quieter (cooler colours + regretful and shy mouse).

Would appreciate any replies to this. I generally don't like knowing the ending of a book before I finish it, so if anything I asked will be explained after the Poole twins meet Robert in the chapter "Valentina and Julia Underground", it's OK, I should eventually get to it. :) Thanks!



Jory
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 2 Jun 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 17,520
Location: Tornado Alley

07 Oct 2011, 3:32 am

I tried reading her book The Time Traveler's Wife after everyone in the world told me how amazingly wonderful it was. I found it to be so sickeningly awful that I gave up on it rather early and it became one of the few books I've ever dropped in the trash can. I could type up a huge description of what makes it so bad, but luckily an online critic tore the book to shreds in a more lucid and entertaining way than I ever could, and his review is linked below. Needless to say, I'm in no hurry to waste any of my time on her other writing.

Enjoy.



whiterat
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 3 Aug 2011
Age: 37
Gender: Female
Posts: 280
Location: Singapore

07 Oct 2011, 4:45 am

Jory wrote:
I tried reading her book The Time Traveler's Wife after everyone in the world told me how amazingly wonderful it was. I found it to be so sickeningly awful that I gave up on it rather early and it became one of the few books I've ever dropped in the trash can. I could type up a huge description of what makes it so bad, but luckily an online critic tore the book to shreds in a more lucid and entertaining way than I ever could, and his review is linked below. Needless to say, I'm in no hurry to waste any of my time on her other writing.

Enjoy.
The Time Traveler's Wife is indeed the first book from this author I heard of. The idea of a guy travelling back in time over and over again and meeting his wife at different ages fascinates me, but I don't think my mind will be able to keep up with such a story. So I didn't watch the film or read the book.

I still have more than half the book to read. So far it's been an enjoyable ride, but will only pass judgement on the book if and when I finish the whole thing.

I like how you describe the review though - that's how I have felt in the past about some singers' work.



Claradoon
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 23 Aug 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,966
Location: Canada

07 Oct 2011, 6:08 am

Isn't that funny - I loved The Time Traveller's Wife. I started reading after supper; every time I looked up was a hour later; I finished it at dawn. Couldn't put it down at all.

I blame myself for writing a positive review for About.com without taking into account the readers who will want the how of time travel. I heard from one reader who assumed the book would include scientific theory.

But I don't like romances, so that wasn't why I loved The Time Traveller's Wife. I am truly sorry you didn't have such a grand time with it as I did.

Please tell me - what was sickeningly awful?



whiterat
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 3 Aug 2011
Age: 37
Gender: Female
Posts: 280
Location: Singapore

07 Oct 2011, 9:36 am

Claradoon wrote:
I blame myself for writing a positive review for About.com without taking into account the readers who will want the how of time travel. I heard from one reader who assumed the book would include scientific theory.

I am one of those readers who would be interested in the whys and hows of the unusual things in science fiction. Extensive scientific theory not necessary though - my brain would explode (as a kid I know would say) if I had to read a complex scientific explanation.



Jory
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 2 Jun 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 17,520
Location: Tornado Alley

07 Oct 2011, 12:25 pm

Claradoon wrote:
Please tell me - what was sickeningly awful?


It's all in the review I linked to. I didn't write it, but I agree with every word of it. The awfulness has nothing to do with the time travel not being explained. It's just bad, bad, bad writing.

Here's the link again:

http://www.noisetosignal.org/books/2007 ... eltigt.php