Apple_in_my_Eye wrote:
Well, of course it exists between all groups, but that doesn't make it all the same. A literal minority, in the sense of numbers or relative power, is in a weaker position to engage in, for instance, institutional or legislative discrimination (i.e. there will be fewer all-black banks/police-departments/sherriff's-offices in white neighborhoods than the other way around, or laws that lead to longer sentences for 'white drugs' (power cocaine vs. crack) are unlikely in mostly-white legislatures.
This isn't always true though - in a number of inner-city places in England, the ethnic minorities are actually a majority (or near-majority). Most of the people in the Borough of Newham, for example, are non-white. The likes of Newham, Harrow, Redbridge and Tower Hamlets are over 40% "Asian" (which often means Pakistani Muslim), and in the case of Tower Hamlets, the Islamists have been repeatedly accused of taking over the council. In parts of Blackburn with Darwen, which is near me, they have Pakistani areas and white areas. I wouldn't really want to be the sole white person living in a veryy black or Pakistani Muslim area as I could imagine that it's threatening and isolating.
There are a number of other places in England where minorities dominate considerable areas of towns and cities. I'm thinking of places like Southwark, Lewisham, Lambeth, Croydon and Hackney (to name a few), all in London, where there are very, very large black populations. These areas tend to have high crime rates as well, as do many of the Muslim areas. I wouldn't want to give in any areas like this either.
So it's not fair just to blame white people for racism all the time - people are people, and black people, as well as Indians, Pakistans, Chinese, you name it, can be as vicious as anyone. We're all human, we all have the same feelings about other people. There are a lot of Asians who consider black people beneath contempt, for instance.
Last edited by Tequila on 02 Jan 2013, 5:07 am, edited 2 times in total.