Pleiadians/Plejarans?

Post Reply New Topic

Before I go into this I'll put on my welding mask just so I don't get my face bruised by the rotten tomatoes - I know where I'm posting this.

I'm curious if anyone is researching this, just out of their own ontological curiosity. What I mean; the bible calls them 'watchers', the ufologists call them Nords, Billy Meier via his contacts with them calls them Pejarans (ie. a star technically behind the Pleiades) and would claim they're here to help us learn how to evolve without blowing ourselves up or polluting ourselves to death, Steve Quayle and David Flynn would call them all of the following - watchers, gods of antiquity (Sumeria, Egypt, Greece etc.) and of course fallen angels, Nephilim, powers and principalities, etc. etc.. - the light-bearers of the 2nd Thessalonian 'strong delusion'.

I just ordered something from Amazon which is a compilation of Billy Meier's Pleiadian messages (forgot the author) in that it took the whole thing in extract - mainly that I want to see what's coming out of this. I'd love to know a bit more about how accurate/innacurate the Henock Prophecies really are and as well as try to make up my own mind on who's closer to the truth on this - Billy Meier or the Watchers/Fallen Angels/Nephilim crowd. Its an important question to answer - for me at least - because it says a lot about what's potentially happening and where we're going.

Oh yeah. I forgot.

Twenty years ago Shirley McClaine told us that we not only have to believe in UFO's we have to believe in her theory about where specifically they come from: the Pleides star cluster.

Which bunch is 'closer to truth?': the Pleidian believing crowd, or the Nephilim crowd?

Isnt that like asking "which is more fun? Being thrown off of a cliff, or being buried alive?"

Not much of choice you're offering us, is it?

I'll open it this way - *something* is culturally going on here.

I don't mind anyone saying these beings don't exist, just that I'd love them to elaborate something intelligent rather than giving a trite knee-jerk drive by or one-liner.

I've been forced in so many ways to accept that some flanks so to speak of what we'd call supernatural narratives (for the lack of a better term) are real, its just figuring out which, who's credible, who isn't, who's saying what and whether I can fact-check it to my satisfaction.

Part of the problem is I look around YouTube and find little more about Bill Meier's prophecies than one guy - ie. Michael Horn. I'd also love to know if anyone has examined the so-called 'Talmud of Jmmanuel' and had a chance to academically carbon date it. I'd also love to know if anyone else has a secured copy of Bill Meier's prophecies - which are supposed to be even more accurate than Edgar Cayce's, a copy that hasn't been altered since the early 1980's to see if any of that info is accurate.

I'll admit - its not impossible that anything we hear about Pleiadians/Pejarans these days isn't just ripped off and inspired from the Billy Meier case and tweaked by different people for their own purposes. The eerie thing about it though is you have really strange congruencies across people who shouldn't want to be aiding each other's agendas, like Pleiaidan channelings that would technically drop tons of huge gleaming gems in the laps of the Nephilim/fallen angel people.

Its not impossible that Billy Meier is a 20th century Edward Kelly, in watching the one biographical video right now he seems like the type of guy - a bit like Edward Kelly or even Aleister Crowley - that one would have called an adventurer/huckster/charlatan but that's where I'd love to see more about these so-called Henock prophecies would be immensely helpful - ie. I'd have something I could falsify that much quicker.


Back to the first line though - if you've got an in-depth debunk its quite welcome, ie. I'll take any tools I can use

Mike Horn chatter is at least a little more passive here, albeit not in the beginning:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ixd4HKoCHXk

What's absolutely mind-bending, watching the last half hour I'm watching this fall right in a row with new age and right in a row with book of Revelations from the Enochian perspective. I've seen the last two scenarios - ie. new age ascension and biblical great deception and tribulation (of the Chapter 20 variety though) do a very tightly woven dance where all the possibilities look like they're right in a line for both to be different stakeholders in the same event. This video adds another dance partner moving in fluid and nearly flawless motion with the last.

The whole 'petrus romanus' thing makes it all the more interesting. Supposedly the 'restrainer's hand is removed, and when its removed the watchers can do a bit more than just watch or make trips in token numbers. So....... it'll be incredibly relevent I think, what happens come March when we have a new pope, when we get to see what he does or doesn't do, and if in the next ten or twenty years of him being pope if nothing comes to fruition, or if there is no such 'alien contact' as the Vatican seems to be prepping for, then we can start thinking there's some possibility that they might be right in what they're saying.

What sucks about the book of Revelation is its very difficult to pin-down which agents will be involved in the final deception - ie. who it will be the force. Some are convinced it'll be an Islamic caliphate, some are convinced it'll be China and Russia, some are convinced that it will be that new age sci-fi channel advent of a several mile across disc or Mt. Olympus over every major city like Independence Day where the gods of antiquity and 'men of renown' come back to talk to us about Mars as well as how they created us; if the message is clear in the back part of this video we at least get to see a few points added to Steve Quayle's tally. The Talmud of Jmmanuel also seems to be incredibly dubious - ie. it likely is a heretical text from biblical times....but....something new exactly what he needed and where it was. I can't prove that but I'd call that a likely point-in-waiting also in Steve Quayle's benefit.

Why do you believe in this stuff? Genuine question.

The King James version of the bible excludes the most important book of them all, the Book of Enoch. The Annunaki were the 1/3 Angels who chose to descent to Earth and have lusty sex with the Earth women. This was a big no no because they birthed Nephilem, the Titans. These Nephilem were evil they fcked everything up and started wars just for fun. Then Jahova decided to flood the Earth destroying the Nephilem race and civilization. But the bloodline still survives to this day, for more information look up Brotherhood of the serpent, the Rothschilds and the Bahvarian Illuminati.

Okay.



So we will all just sweep it under the rug and pretend you didnt in effect ask me to 'put up or shut up" ( in more polite terms ill grant you-but that was the idea), and pretend that you never said that.

Lol!

Im more interested in hearing your respond to Yuugirl's question anyway.

Why DO you believe this stuff?