eggheadjr wrote:
Yes it constitutes a formal diagnosis. That's the way doctors are taught to write things, that they are rendering a formal and professional opinion. "In my opinion patient X has / is...".
Out of curiosity, I went back to read my own diagnostic report. I hadn’t notice before, but the diagnosis statement is a little bit “indirect”.
In a section titled, “Summary and Diagnosis”, the clinical psychologist describes a
whole bunch of, um, observations (e.g. lack of social/emotional reciprocity, behavioral dysregulation, limited social knowledge, immersed in details, verbose speech, inflexible thinking, etc. etc.) and then writes that all of these "are consistent with Asperger's Disorder (DSM-IV-TR 299.80). This constellation of abilities and deficits is enduring and significant".
The choice of words, “are consistent with” does seem to be an odd way to diagnose someone.