ZenDen wrote:
I saw the videos of the incident. It seemed clear the gorilla had no animosity toward the child. Why did no one offer a huge bunch of bananas (etc.) to the gorilla to lure it away? It seemed as though there were no emergency plans in place and they just tried to make it up as they went. Damn shame.
Well, according to an EXPERT on the subject, the gorilla's death was JUSTIFIED.
Quote:
Jack Hanna, the Director Emeritus of the Columbus Zoo in Ohio, and the host of a series of television shows about wild animals, defended the decision to put down the animal. "I've seen him take a green coconut, which you can't bust open with a sledgehammer and squish it like this", gesturing with his hand the ease with which gorillas can crush fruit. "You're dealing with either human life or animal life here. So what is the decision? I think it's very simple to figure that out. I can tell you now, that there's no doubt in my mind the child would not be here today if they hadn't made that decision."
Just because some ignorant animal lovers think that all gorillas are cute does not mean that
this gorilla would not have ripped the boy to pieces ... and then eaten him.
Link to Source:
Gorilla Would Have Killed Boy
_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.