...What , making the SCOTUS dwindle down to nothing if the Senate doesn't get exactly what it wants is checks and balances/reasonable government ?
BULLDINKY ! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !!
McCain said he/the Reps would block ALL Hillary Court nominees , remember ! !! !! !! !! !!
And , incidentally , the President having her or his perogative to nominate , and the Semat7e (yes ,. yes...even if it isn't spelled out) to reasonably consider her nominees is on of the PRESIDENT'S perogative !
Really , is seen as fulfilling that Grover Norquist " drown government in the bathtub " thang
?
Jacoby wrote:
Part of the checks and balances is that the Senate is needed to approve a SCOTUS nominee, president does not make the decision by decree by design. If the GOP doesn't want to approve nominees then they shouldn't, they won control of the Senate for these very reason. Nothing in the constitution says that there have to be 9 justices, nothing says it has to be an odd number even, they could keep it 8 permanently or perhaps pass legislation which says the next opening will not be filled to bring it down to 7. GOP under no circumstances should capitulate on 1st and 2nd Amendment issues, they should use whatever tool at their disposal. Elections have consequences right?
_________________
Renal kidney failure, congestive heart failure, COPD. Can't really get up from a floor position unhelped anymore:-(.
One of the walking wounded ~ SMASHED DOWN by life and age, now prevented from even expressing myself! SOB.
" Oh, no! First you have to PROVE you deserve to go away to college! " ~ My mother, 1978 (the heyday of Andy Gibb and Player). I would still like to go.

My life destroyed by Thorazine and Mellaril - and rape - and the Psychiatric/Industrial Complex. SOB:-(! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !!