Kiprobalhato wrote:
it has become apparent that outright locking threads is not always an efficient solution for instances of a select few users/posts attacking and being rude in an otherwise good and civil thread.
it's just more fair all around in that case.
I AGREE!! I've been saying, all-along, that when a thread gets locked, it's like punishing, everyone, in the thread.naturalplastic wrote:
Noticed a recent thread sink to two folks trading insults (and it looked like it would locked any second),but the thread continued with out even a warning, and righted itself more or less away from the ad hom attacks on its own. So maybe not locking that particular thread worked.
Yep, I've seen a few people really put-in an effort, to change a thread, around----so that it wouldn't get locked (I imagine), and I think that's EXCELLENT!!TheSpectrum wrote:
Another thing was threads used to get locked merely for triggering when the people discussing in the thread were behaved, yet someone comes into the thread, takes offence to something in it then causes problems/aims to get the thread locked or "shut down" because they're triggered and feel this makes it justifiable. The current approach is again more constructive from what I've observed.
Yep----like that user, "ImAnSJWwithAnAnnoyinglyLongName", running, every five minutes, to the "Attention Mods" thread.
_________________
White female; age 59; diagnosed Aspie.
I use caps for emphasis----I'm NOT angry or shouting. I use caps like others use italics, underline, or bold.
"What we know is a drop; what we don't know, is an ocean." (Sir Isaac Newton)