Undeniable evidence JFK killed by 2nd shooter

Post Reply New Topic

House Oversight Committee hearing, Dr. Don Curtis, who attempted to save President John F. Kennedy at the hospital after he was shot, spoke to Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN) about what he saw.


Oswald's bullets from the book depository were accounted for. 1. One entered Governor Conolly 2. the so called magic bullet entered Kennedy's back.

two bullets hit JFK from the front, the bullet that killed JFK entered from the front temple from the front of the cavicade, not from behind. Indicating there must have been at least 1 maybe 2 other shooters.

So after 60 years all of a sudden there's undeniable evidence because a dentist who was one of several people in the room is somehow a ballistics expert? Is this the first time since 1963 he's testified?

I think key witnesses were never called up by the Warren Commission. the newly released documentation from the CIA archives now suggest the CIA were actively employing at least one agent to engage in stonewalling evidence that was would have been admissible but never "officially" reviewed.

the doctor's testimony isn't that shocking since the Zapruda footage quite clearly shows Kennedy's head rocking back from the fatal bullet which came from the front of Kennedy. What I didn't know is Kennedy was hit three times, one other bullet likely from Oswald which entered his back (I think this is the one where Kennedy is holding his shoulder), and another from the front likely the grassy knoll which everyone suspected.

I think this now should be enough information to re-open the Kennedy case, in light of other information on the apparent hold the CIA had over Oswald who is looking more and more like a double agent and CIA plant sacrificed to keep quiet in classic James Bond style.

Whether they were called by the Warren commission or not, lots of people who were there have given testimony in interviews and written books about it. Including the two primary physicians who worked on Kennedy. When it comes to that oral surgeon, I don't see how he could possibly know the trajectory of the bullets. There was stonewalling from the beginning when the secret service refused to let the Dallas coroner examine the body and illegally whisked it away. There's plenty of fishy stuff that went on. But after all this time and the countless investigations that have been made, it's been played out as far as it will go.

However, what those guys had to say was interesting.

^^^ Dr Don Curtis is an forensic/emergency oral surgeon so is familiar with head trauma, he was actually called in by the attending officer to assist with saving JFKs life and was filled in by the presiding emergency medics on JFK's condition. I think that's all on the public record.

Curtis has no reason to lie under oath (a criminal offence), he's also one of a number of doctors who claim the head trauma was from a bullet entering the front of the skull. I think the overwhelming evidence buries Oswald's lone magic bullet which never really stood up to scrutiny anyway.

I'm not saying he's lying. I'm wondering how he would know for a fact that a bullet came from a railroad trestle etc.

The magic bullet was solved a long time ago.

The idea was Connally was directly in front of Kennedy.



But instead Connally was to the left of Kennedy.



https://bestdfwtours.com/journal/stop-t ... gle-bullet

Good question, I think it was based on the angle of entry but I am not sure how they worked it out.

More evidence

I just wanted to say that I deny that there was a 2nd shooter. AFAIK, the only real points that ever suggested multiple shooters were that magic bullet theory based on the incorrect seating positions and an audio model that was done with the microphones in the wrong place.

I do sort of get that people really want there to have been a conspiracy, but if that were the case, we would have known by now. Somebody would have left evidence on their deathbed indicating that they had done it or there would have been a falling out, or something concrete that points towards something more likely than Oswald working alone. It was a different era, they didn't have computers that could keep track of the locations of malcontents with regards to a route, any of that would have to be done manually and very inefficiently.

Forensic science has vastly improved since 1964. the evidence in the current hearings are all lining up with Kennedy being fatally shot from the front. the Zapruda film clearly shows ballistic evidence the bullet that blew his skull came from the front. For some reason the Warren commission "played dumb" when shown the film and agreed it was all Oswald and his rickety old rifle and magic bullet.

I don't buy it. I've seen the video rather a lot and all of the other theories involve a lot of magic. The original line that Oswald acted alone shooting from the book depository answers all the legitimate questions rather neatly without the need for extra narratives. You can pretty clearly see the exit wound being to roughly the front of the head.

I really and truly do not see any actual evidence that he wasn't shot from behind. The only thing I can possibly see is his head subsequently going backwards towards the shooter, but that's simply the car accelerating out of the way.

The Zapruder film clearly shows President Kennedy’s head jerking BACK violently and TO THE LEFT in response to the head shot (I don't see any forward movement at all and I've watched that film multiple times) you can even see the bullet impact the front right temple leaving a crater. 100% sure visually the splatter is from bullet entering from the front left and second the trajectory is low, no way in the world given the height of the book depository Oswald's magic bullet could come out at that level.

third MULTIPLE witnesses described a shot coming from the area of the grassy knoll in Dealey Plaza and NOT from the 6th floor window of the schoolbook depository, although I’ll concede it is at least possible that EARLIER shots might have originated from Oswald's rifle at or near that location.

IDK about that. I've watched it several times. Enhanced, up close, slow motion. And the first place you see anything happening is from the front of the head extending outward. In my opinion that demonstrates where the bullet exited from, not where it entered. If it had entered from the front and exited out the back all the gore would have been on the trunk of the car. Instead according to Connally, he (and presumably everyone else in front) was covered with it. Unfortunately it's hard to talk about this without being gruesome. But I'm trying to not be too graphic.

The "magic bullet" refers to the round that passed through Kennedy's neck and into Connally. Not the head shot. And it was called the "magic bullet" because it would have had to zig-zag to go tough Connally's torso, wrist and into his thigh, IF Connally had been seated directly in front of Kennedy. But he wasn't. He was seated to the left of Kennedy. Which means bullet #2 was actually traveling in a straight line and therefore NOT a "magic bullet" at all.

Bullet #1 was a miss. Bullet #2 (mistakenly called "the magic bullet") went through Kennedy's neck and into Governor Connally. Bullet #3 was the head shot. That bullet probably vaporized. Then there's the "pristine bullet" that was found on a stretcher after the shooting. The "pristine bullet" is the mystery bullet.

Okay well that means the Zapruder film copies everyone has been watching are fakes.

Huh? are you sure