Every business is required to make annual reports showing the profits and expenses for their manufacturing, advertising, distribution, etc. In last year's annual report, Sony showed a surprising amount of money put into pushing the PS2 rather than the PS3, as well as ports of recent titles for the system (Tomb Raider, Sonic Unleashed, the upcoming Ghostbusters game, etc).
Think about this for a minute. Remember when Sony was heavily marketing the $399 40GB version of the PS3? One of the biggest complaints was that it wasn't backwards compatible. And the versions of the PS3 that ARE backwards compatible are only through emulation, so it's software rather than hardware. Why do you think this is?
Because backwards compatibility wasn't a factor in the PS3. Not because they wanted to focus on new titles (they sure are taking their time on exclusives) but because they wanted people to buy both the PS3 AND the PS2. Go to your local game store or retailer, I guarantee that at the minimum the PS2 and their respective Greatest Hits collection will still have a prominent display.
I confess I already thought Sony was kinda evil. Every time a new system of theirs comes out there's some management decision that makes me think "man that's wicked!". But charging $400, $500, $600 for a system and then expecting people to spend another $150 on a last gen system with it's own library of games that costs god knows what?
Just...MAN that's evil!
_________________
OH GOODIE! - Three Chords in Three Panels
ohgoodie.net
NEVER NORMAL - Saving the World Between Sketchbooks
nevernormal.net