E-mail server thing looks bad for Hillary

Post Reply New Topic

The Republicans have hated the Clintons for a quarter century. While they have given Bill the begrudging respect due to a triumphant foe, they reserve visceral, white-hot, uncompromising bile for Hillary. The fourth estate has--as is their duty--gone over her and her background with many, many fine toothed combs.

After a quarter of a century of scrutiny by resourceful, powerful people who desperately want to take her down, what have they come up with? Nothing. So we are left with a couple of possibilities. Perhaps she is corrupt, and clever enough to hoodwink the Republicans, and law enforcement agencies at federal, state and local levels (remember, the email scandal is not the first attempt to stick something to her). Or perhaps, this is another scandal with no substance.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... l-abramson

I'm prepared to take Jill Abramson's reasoned opinion over someone's "genuine belief" in Clinton's criminality.

Why would least principled politicians in history elicit the strongest response? Why hasn't Obama implicated in scandal after scandal if there really was this 'vast right wing conspiracy'? They were embroiled in scandal before they even left Arkansas. Doesn't make a lot of sense. Jill Abramson, the ****canned disgraced former editor of the New York Times, thinks she's 'fundamentally honest' which I think should even get a snort out of her supporters. She had the best truth telling record on the Politifact or factcheck or whatever! She talks about money in politics but what about money in media? Who funds those sites? Who funds the media? It couldn't possibly be George Soros could it? It couldn't possibly be the special interests of Wall Street and the richest people on this planet could it? People definitely should follow the money with Hillary, follow the $25 million she was paid for 'speeches' to bankers at Goldman Sachs and the like that she refuses to even release the transcripts too, follow the hundreds of millions of dollars in foreign donations that poured into the Clinton Foundation while she served as Secretary of State, to throw it back follow $1000 "investment" she made into $100000 by supposedly trading cattle futures in less than 10 months only to never trade again, she said she was 'dead broke' and in debt when Bill left office but now they're somehow worth hundreds of millions of dollars? Remember when she was talking 'sniper fire' in Kosovo?

http://www.mediaite.com/online/audio-do ... t-in-2008/

http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/201 ... f-the-time

https://www.washingtonpost.com/postever ... tly-lying/

http://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2016 ... se-bts.cnn

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions ... story.html

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/4 ... -huge-lies

Yeah Trump seems principled.

Trump was a private citizen not an elected or even appointed official

he has been consistent on his core beliefs and has been for for over 30 years

he is a much more honest person than Hillary, Trump says whats on his mind too much whereas Hillary needs it focus group tested before opening her mouth on anything. Do you believe she's really against TPP? Do you really believe she's not beholden to Wall Street?

President Truman is now known to have been extremely racist and anti-Jewish. But, the world didn't know this at the time. If simple, ordinary, elected Democrats are beset upon, where were the criticisms of earlier Democrats? The endless litany of doubts expressed about the Clintons only mounts, it never goes away.

I was a Clinton delegate in 1996. In 1991, I served as a security staffer when then-Gov. Bill Clinton spoke to the Democratic National Committee in Los Angeles. I knew people who were friends with the Clintons since college. The Clinton administration approved my appointment to serve as an adviser to the U.S. Office of the Attorney for the District of Utah. I served as one of Bill's campaign-committee members in my state. In other words, I believed strongly in the Clintons.

So, how does my current opinion about them differ from what it was 15 years ago? Answer: I became exhausted of constantly defending them while, bit by bit, I realized that there was some "there, there." Where there is smoke, there is fire. And, that opinion comes from an LGBT former Democratic leader. Speaking of former Democrats, why is it that about one-third of registered Democrats left their party in the last several years (according to Pew Research Center polling data)?

How is it a different standard? I find Hillary's positions fundamentally corrupt on top of the personal corruption, it's not just her words/lies that bother me as she has disgraceful record. When it comes down to it, you have choice between the ultimate force of the status quo and an outsider and I know who I'm going with.

http://www.mediaite.com/print/report-fb ... side-deal/

Hey Jacoby,

Didn't you post an article that said there would be mass resignations of FBI agents if they didn't indict? Well, I'm waiting.