kxmode wrote:
No. Their sin was irreversible. Adam and Eve were perfect, flawless, unblemished in God's eyes. When they sinned they became imperfect. That imperfection was past down to their children like a trait, and thus it spread from generation to generation. I like how
Romans 5:12 succinctly puts it: "Therefore, just as sin entered the world through one man, and death through sin, and in this way death came to all men, because all sinned." That's why it took Jesus Christ, and only Jesus, to offer his life in exchange for Adam's sin. Jesus was born a perfect human being, completely free of the mortal stain of sin. Jesus was Adam's counterpart.
Maybe you can explain something to me, because I don't understand this. How can something which is created to be perfect
become imperfect in the first place? Perfection is inherently infallible, is it not? If, theoretically, man was created perfect, wouldn't the possibility of Adam and Eve eating the forbidden fruit have been nil? Wouldn't God's warning to them have been a wholly moot point?
The way I see it, there are two lenses through which the story of original sin can be viewed, and I think both have their own problems. The first is through the lens of free will: Adam and Eve exercised free will, and
chose to eat the fruit, thus disobeying God's decree. But if God is truly omniscient, then He obviously would have known that free will would ultimately lead Adam and Eve astray-- so why would He have given us the free will to disobey Him, if He knew all along it would result in man being ejected from Eden, and being made to suffer?
The other way of looking at the story is through the lens of fate: Adam and Eve had no free will, they were
fated to eat the fruit. But then, what is the point of even placing Adam and Eve in Eden in the first place? If God
knew man would end up suffering anyway, why wouldn't He forgo all of that business about forbidden fruits altogether?
Wouldn't it be entirely within God's power to create humans who truly
would have resisted the temptation of the serpent, and who would have remained in Eden? Isn't that a far better existence than the one that occurred?