"It's my birthday, so vote against 'Gay Marriage'"

Page 7 of 15 [ 225 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 15  Next

TeaEarlGreyHot
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jul 2010
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 28,982
Location: California

04 Feb 2012, 1:16 pm

Tequila wrote:
TeaEarlGreyHot wrote:
But, what if it's a sexy lamppost?


A sexy lamppost you can't take home with you? That's not going to work, is it?


Sure, why not?


_________________
Still looking for that blue jean baby queen, prettiest girl I've ever seen.


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,796
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

04 Feb 2012, 2:27 pm

AngelRho wrote:
TeaEarlGreyHot wrote:
AngelRho wrote:
TeaEarlGreyHot wrote:
What evidence do you have that 'gay marriage' is harmful to children?

I never said it was.


Then I don't understand your argument for keeping marriage between one man and one woman.

Because I'm not making that argument.

The point I'm trying to make is that by redefining marriage to make it something that it is not, never has been, and can never be essentially makes the word meaningless. If marriage fails as an institution between two people of the opposite sex--and there are good reasons to be married and stay in committed relationships for male-female couples--then why even bother getting married at all? I'm not just trying to be an old-fashioned, tradition-for-tradition's-sake homophobe here. It's just that when it comes to tradition, sometimes the winners actually deserve to win.

One of the worst things to happen to the institution of marriage in the west has been the legalization of NFD, which I think very well has resulted from the Hollywood mentality idealized romantic love and the idea that you can divorce someone if you no longer love them. Love is important in a marriage, but there's a lot more to being married than love alone--or at least romantic love. All couples hit tough times in marriage and divorce seems like a good, easy way out. Quite often you'll find that couples who hit a rough patch and decide to tough it out are much happier 5 years later. If romantic sentiment or sexual desire are the only things that lead you in the direction of getting married, perhaps it's best not to get married at all since those kinds of things do not make for anything that can possibly last long term.

The way I see it, expanding marriage beyond what it is further weakens the institution, just like NFD did a few decades ago. If the effects of divorce have proven harmful, then traditional marriage should be protected, and it doesn't matter where the threat comes from (whether NFD or redefinition). I'd predict an increase in divorce rate for traditional couples. We'll see if I'm right in 10-20 years.


Marriage based on romantic love Hollywood style sure beats the hell out of what marriage had once been - just legal contract. And the notion of romantic love doesn't necessarily have to lead to divorce just because the couple hits a rough patch. I like to think romantic love had had a great deal to do with my marriage, and despite ups and downs, my wife and I are still together, and very happy.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer



abacacus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Apr 2007
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,380

04 Feb 2012, 3:42 pm

Who cares if the divorce rates increase? How does this negatively impact your life in the slightest AngelRho? What harm does it cause to you when someone gets divorced? What harm would it cause for two men to marry?


I can answer that for you. None.


_________________
A shot gun blast into the face of deceit
You'll gain your just reward.
We'll not rest until the purge is complete
You will reap what you've sown.


AngelRho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jan 2008
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,366
Location: The Landmass between N.O. and Mobile

04 Feb 2012, 4:07 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
Marriage based on romantic love Hollywood style sure beats the hell out of what marriage had once been - just legal contract. And the notion of romantic love doesn't necessarily have to lead to divorce just because the couple hits a rough patch.

I never said it did necessarily lead to divorce. I said that romantic feelings are only one facet of marital relationships. The Hollywood romance effect on marriage and its relationship to NFD has to do with a misperception of what marriage is really about. Most couples tend to cool down after marriage, so the Hollywood-esque romantic sentiment isn''t the glue that holds most long-term marriages together.

I don't have a problem with marriage being a legal contract, either. I feel the reasons that a man and woman make a lifelong commitment to each other is their business. Its permanence is ensured by the daily task of working towards mutually beneficial goals, and out of that comes mutual responsibility. That the nonchalant dissolution of such a partnership is so readily available only serves to cheapen the value of any kind of vow that is ever made (all vows are fundamentally the same, only varying in language and purpose). A society that seemingly promotes breaking promises is irresponsible and lacks integrity.



AngelRho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jan 2008
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,366
Location: The Landmass between N.O. and Mobile

04 Feb 2012, 4:17 pm

abacacus wrote:
I can answer that for you. None.

People who are unaffected by the wrongs that their fellow human beings inflict on each other lack compassion. What's better--to take a drunk friend home by force or to allow him to put himself and others in harms way because it's "none of your business"?



abacacus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Apr 2007
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,380

04 Feb 2012, 4:22 pm

AngelRho wrote:
abacacus wrote:
I can answer that for you. None.

People who are unaffected by the wrongs that their fellow human beings inflict on each other lack compassion. What's better--to take a drunk friend home by force or to allow him to put himself and others in harms way because it's "none of your business"?


I don't see how this is even remotely related.

I also don't see how gay marriage in any way wrongs anyone.


_________________
A shot gun blast into the face of deceit
You'll gain your just reward.
We'll not rest until the purge is complete
You will reap what you've sown.


TeaEarlGreyHot
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jul 2010
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 28,982
Location: California

04 Feb 2012, 4:39 pm

AngelRho wrote:
abacacus wrote:
I can answer that for you. None.

People who are unaffected by the wrongs that their fellow human beings inflict on each other lack compassion. What's better--to take a drunk friend home by force or to allow him to put himself and others in harms way because it's "none of your business"?


Divorce is sometimes the least harmful path.


_________________
Still looking for that blue jean baby queen, prettiest girl I've ever seen.


Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

04 Feb 2012, 4:42 pm

abacacus wrote:
I also don't see how gay marriage in any way wrongs anyone.


I can understand a lot of churches not recognising it, though, which is why it shouldn't be called 'marriage' in law if we don't live in a secular state.

I think the problem is that a minority of activists want everything their own way.



NeantHumain
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jun 2004
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,837
Location: St. Louis, Missouri

04 Feb 2012, 4:43 pm

My guess is her fundie parents put her up to this.



CrazyCatLord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Oct 2011
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,177

04 Feb 2012, 4:45 pm

AngelRho wrote:
People who are unaffected by the wrongs that their fellow human beings inflict on each other lack compassion. What's better--to take a drunk friend home by force or to allow him to put himself and others in harms way because it's "none of your business"?


I for one do feel compassion for my fellow human beings. That's why I find your comment quite offensive. Your drunk driving comparison is not only greatly insulting to gay and lesbian parents who are doing a terrific job, but also to single parents.

I was raised in a traditional family by two hyper-religious parents, who did a very poor job compared to the mothers of this young man:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSQQK2Vuf9Q&feature=g-vrec&context=G2a48a72RVAAAAAAAAAg[/youtube]



TeaEarlGreyHot
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jul 2010
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 28,982
Location: California

04 Feb 2012, 4:49 pm

CrazyCatLord wrote:
AngelRho wrote:
People who are unaffected by the wrongs that their fellow human beings inflict on each other lack compassion. What's better--to take a drunk friend home by force or to allow him to put himself and others in harms way because it's "none of your business"?


I for one do feel compassion for my fellow human beings. That's why I find your comment quite offensive. Your drunk driving comparison is not only greatly insulting to gay and lesbian parents who are doing a terrific job, but also to single parents.

I was raised in a traditional family by two hyper-religious parents, who did a very poor job compared to the mothers of this young man:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSQQK2Vuf9Q&feature=g-vrec&context=G2a48a72RVAAAAAAAAAg[/youtube]


:thumleft:


_________________
Still looking for that blue jean baby queen, prettiest girl I've ever seen.


Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

04 Feb 2012, 4:49 pm

NeantHumain wrote:
My guess is her fundie parents put her up to this.


And the same applies when authoritarians and socialists of any stripe use children as shields to hide behind. It's a nasty business whoever does it.



AngelRho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jan 2008
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,366
Location: The Landmass between N.O. and Mobile

04 Feb 2012, 5:07 pm

CrazyCatLord wrote:
AngelRho wrote:
People who are unaffected by the wrongs that their fellow human beings inflict on each other lack compassion. What's better--to take a drunk friend home by force or to allow him to put himself and others in harms way because it's "none of your business"?


I for one do feel compassion for my fellow human beings. That's why I find your comment quite offensive.

Then you completely missed my point. I also never said gay/lesbian parents did poor jobs, and neither did I say single parents do poor jobs. I just said that devaluation of marriage and the family has a negative impact on society. Marriage partners who fall victim to the mighty NFD are negatively impacted in obvious mental, emotional, and economic ways. Children accustomed to the stability of family relationships are negatively impacted emotionally and perhaps developmentally (at least in academic performance) over breakups, particularly when dealing with visitation and custody disputes. Single-parent families, while they certainly can function and function well, often suffer for the obvious lack of economic advantages and opportunities that stable traditional homes provide.

I'm sorry that you feel insulted.



Oodain
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jan 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,022
Location: in my own little tamarillo jungle,

04 Feb 2012, 5:19 pm

but its not a devaluation,. the idea that it is, is in itself whats insulting.


_________________
//through chaos comes complexity//

the scent of the tamarillo is pungent and powerfull,
woe be to the nose who nears it.


CrazyCatLord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Oct 2011
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,177

04 Feb 2012, 5:27 pm

AngelRho wrote:
CrazyCatLord wrote:
AngelRho wrote:
People who are unaffected by the wrongs that their fellow human beings inflict on each other lack compassion. What's better--to take a drunk friend home by force or to allow him to put himself and others in harms way because it's "none of your business"?


I for one do feel compassion for my fellow human beings. That's why I find your comment quite offensive.

Then you completely missed my point. I also never said gay/lesbian parents did poor jobs, and neither did I say single parents do poor jobs. I just said that devaluation of marriage and the family has a negative impact on society. Marriage partners who fall victim to the mighty NFD are negatively impacted in obvious mental, emotional, and economic ways. Children accustomed to the stability of family relationships are negatively impacted emotionally and perhaps developmentally (at least in academic performance) over breakups, particularly when dealing with visitation and custody disputes. Single-parent families, while they certainly can function and function well, often suffer for the obvious lack of economic advantages and opportunities that stable traditional homes provide.

I'm sorry that you feel insulted.


The high divorce rate in traditional heterosexual marriages is in no way related to marriage equality though. If it wasn't your intent to make a point against gay marriage, I wonder why you brought it up in this thread.

I agree that children are negatively affected by poverty, but economic disadvantages affect both single parents and traditional families at the lower end of the income scale. The obvious solution is to do something about poverty and social inequality, create a fair wage standard, and give everyone access to educational and health care resources. But proposals like that tend to be unpopular with Christian conservative legislators who claim to care so much for the children.



abacacus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Apr 2007
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,380

04 Feb 2012, 6:01 pm

AngelRho wrote:
Then you completely missed my point. I also never said gay/lesbian parents did poor jobs, and neither did I say single parents do poor jobs. I just said that devaluation of marriage and the family has a negative impact on society. Marriage partners who fall victim to the mighty NFD are negatively impacted in obvious mental, emotional, and economic ways. Children accustomed to the stability of family relationships are negatively impacted emotionally and perhaps developmentally (at least in academic performance) over breakups, particularly when dealing with visitation and custody disputes. Single-parent families, while they certainly can function and function well, often suffer for the obvious lack of economic advantages and opportunities that stable traditional homes provide.

I'm sorry that you feel insulted.


None of this is in any way to related to gay marriage.

The only thing that devalues marriage is the way people see marriage. This is not a legal problem, and laws can't solve it. Not allowing same sex couple to marry won't solve it. That should be blatantly obvious to someone such as yourself who appears to have an interest in the subject.

Also, whether or not a couple divorces isn't your business either. It's not a good thing when it happens, but you have no right to tell people they shouldn't be able to do it. I'd wager a bad marriage (abusive marriages especially) do FAR more harm to children than a divorce ever could.

I have no idea why you brought this up in this thread, it isn't relevant to the discussion.


_________________
A shot gun blast into the face of deceit
You'll gain your just reward.
We'll not rest until the purge is complete
You will reap what you've sown.