Page 5 of 8 [ 124 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

LKL
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Age: 48
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,402

22 Feb 2012, 10:02 pm

@ The OP, there are two emotions that generally accompany newfound atheism: first, the feeling of a burden being lifted from your shoulders and a wide world of possibility opening up before you, partly due to a lessening of the limitations of whichever faith you gave up and partly because you no longer have to waste the time and energy trying to justify an illogical world view. Second, many people feel somewhat adrift in their freedom, having 'lost' a parent figure that they could take hope from, a cosmic purpose to believe in, and the false promise of life after death.



AceOfSpades
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Feb 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,754
Location: Sean Penn, Cambodia

22 Feb 2012, 10:23 pm

LKL wrote:
@ The OP, there are two emotions that generally accompany newfound atheism: first, the feeling of a burden being lifted from your shoulders and a wide world of possibility opening up before you, partly due to a lessening of the limitations of whichever faith you gave up and partly because you no longer have to waste the time and energy trying to justify an illogical world view. Second, many people feel somewhat adrift in their freedom, having 'lost' a parent figure that they could take hope from, a cosmic purpose to believe in, and the false promise of life after death.
True. I went through the latter before going through the former though. It is definitely a feeling of possibilities opening up, but the uncertainty that comes with that can also be scary. It's never easy letting go of something that has been deeply ingrained in you since childhood.



MCalavera
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Dec 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,442

22 Feb 2012, 10:51 pm

goodwitchy wrote:
MCalavera wrote:
goodwitchy wrote:
I will not attempt to convert atheists, and I don't think atheists should try to convert theists.


People have the right to convince others of something that's clearly true.

If Christianity is clearly rubbish to me and others, I owe it to myself to let Christians know how much rubbish it is whether they wish to be convinced or not.


Okay; you're entitled to your opinion as well 8)

There are people who will be open to new ideas and others who are quite happy with their current beliefs.
I don't think ANY belief system should be forced on ANYONE, but I have no problem with the sharing of ideas as long as both parties are freely listening and exchanging their thoughts.

(translation: you will not convert me to an atheist)


I'm not an atheist myself. More of an agnostic.

But I find it absurd to treat religious views on the same level as educating scientific views.



goodwitchy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Female
Posts: 785
Location: Interplanetary

22 Feb 2012, 10:55 pm

MCalavera wrote:
goodwitchy wrote:
MCalavera wrote:
goodwitchy wrote:
I will not attempt to convert atheists, and I don't think atheists should try to convert theists.


People have the right to convince others of something that's clearly true.

If Christianity is clearly rubbish to me and others, I owe it to myself to let Christians know how much rubbish it is whether they wish to be convinced or not.


Okay; you're entitled to your opinion as well 8)

There are people who will be open to new ideas and others who are quite happy with their current beliefs.
I don't think ANY belief system should be forced on ANYONE, but I have no problem with the sharing of ideas as long as both parties are freely listening and exchanging their thoughts.

(translation: you will not convert me to an atheist)


I'm not an atheist myself. More of an agnostic.

But I find it absurd to treat religious views on the same level as educating scientific views.

I was only referring to science that is unproven. In my opinion, that's not too much of a stretch....
but then again, I don't take the Bible literally.



Oodain
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jan 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,022
Location: in my own little tamarillo jungle,

22 Feb 2012, 11:01 pm

what fo you mean by unproven?


_________________
//through chaos comes complexity//

the scent of the tamarillo is pungent and powerfull,
woe be to the nose who nears it.


goodwitchy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Female
Posts: 785
Location: Interplanetary

22 Feb 2012, 11:19 pm

Oodain wrote:
what fo you mean by unproven?


hypothesis



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 59,893
Location: Stendec

22 Feb 2012, 11:23 pm

Hypotheses are provable ideas. Theories are proven hypotheses.



Declension
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jan 2012
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,807

22 Feb 2012, 11:27 pm

goodwitchy wrote:
science that is unproven


Saying that you will only accept proven science is like saying that you will only accept green emotions. The word doesn't apply.



goodwitchy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Female
Posts: 785
Location: Interplanetary

22 Feb 2012, 11:30 pm

Fnord wrote:
Hypotheses are provable ideas. Theories are proven hypotheses.


But I thought hypotheses are not proven as hypotheses; only provable once they are theories :?:



goodwitchy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Female
Posts: 785
Location: Interplanetary

22 Feb 2012, 11:33 pm

Declension wrote:
goodwitchy wrote:
science that is unproven


Saying that you will only accept proven science is like saying that you will only accept green emotions. The word doesn't apply.


Okay, terminology is tricky.... before a hypothesis is made, initial thought exists that can lead to a belief.



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 59,893
Location: Stendec

22 Feb 2012, 11:34 pm

Science is merely an extremely powerful method of winnowing what's true from what feels good. That is, supporting evidence must be validated before a claim can be accepted as a fact. Therefor, and unproven claim can not be accepted as a fact, and the claim itself is in doubt.

a. Absence of proof, while not proof of absence, is sufficient cause for reasonable doubt.
b. Faith is the belief in unprovable claims.
: : It is reasonable to doubt any and all faith-based claims.



Oodain
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jan 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,022
Location: in my own little tamarillo jungle,

22 Feb 2012, 11:34 pm

goodwitchy wrote:
Declension wrote:
goodwitchy wrote:
science that is unproven


Saying that you will only accept proven science is like saying that you will only accept green emotions. The word doesn't apply.


Okay, terminology is tricky.... before a hypothesis is made, initial thought exists that can lead to a belief.


no it leaves to a testable hypothesis, not belief.

its the test that decides if it is believable, not to be confused with faith.


_________________
//through chaos comes complexity//

the scent of the tamarillo is pungent and powerfull,
woe be to the nose who nears it.


Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 59,893
Location: Stendec

22 Feb 2012, 11:41 pm

Oodain wrote:
goodwitchy wrote:
Declension wrote:
goodwitchy wrote:
science that is unproven
Saying that you will only accept proven science is like saying that you will only accept green emotions. The word doesn't apply.
Okay, terminology is tricky.... before a hypothesis is made, initial thought exists that can lead to a belief.
no it leaves to a testable hypothesis, not belief. its the test that decides if it is believable, not to be confused with faith.

Faith comes before proof, and continues in its absence.

Belief comes after proof, and even then it is suspect.

In all science, error precedes the truth. In religion, it's the other way around.



DEdwards
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 19 Feb 2012
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 25

22 Feb 2012, 11:43 pm

From what I've learned, science is observing nature and when we can't see some force, we can observe its interaction of influence on something else, thus, we know it's there. Gravity, black holes, time and dark matter are some examples. We might not be able to see these things but we can see their influence on other things that they encompass or is nearby.

No, we can't see gravity but we know it exists because we can feel its influence on us, when we drop something, when we leave the gravitational confines of earth, how much something weighs on a planetary body smaller or greater than that of earth. Today, I literally saw radiation. I thought it was some force that you couldn't see. You totally can with some special paper or film coated with a special oil or liquid. I don't really remember the details right now but the point is, you can't see it, yet it's there. We feel its effect on things.

Scientists use the scientific method to prove or disprove a hypothesis. Sometimes, it's my understanding they will actually be excited when an experiment fails and it's back to the drawing board. That sounds wonderful to me! Religion's beliefs are based upon what's been written, transcribed, translated, passed down, lost, found, retranslated, reinterpreted over and over again until the meaning is lost entirely. For all we know, the passages in the bible (see, I didn't capitalize that) were just parables to help guide - maybe as stories that if you read, you're supposed to think, "gee, I don't like how they're treating women. I'll treat women in my life better" or something along those lines.

Also, I should note that in Sunday school, some of the books of the bible weren't written in Christ's life but decades, sometimes centuries after he died. That always sat kind of wrong with me.

In Exodus, God sent the 7 plagues on everyone in Egypt. Everyone was afflicted with these burdens and curses except the king. What did the people of Egypt do to deserve this? It was the king who wouldn't free the Hebrews.

I think I may have figured out prayer: It's like talking out your problems aloud. If you hear them instead of thinking about them. It's like being able to help others while having the same problem yourself. I can talk someone through something but I might not be able to willing to do the thing myself. I'm trying to think of a hobby or something where this would be applicable. I'm drawing a blank. It's not that you're receiving instruction through some divine presence but you're doing the thinking, you're doing the work yourself. Could be too the more you think about something, the clearer will be the answer. That could be it, too.

I'm changing my major in school next week to biology or something in the sciences. I want to do something that matters, something with my brain where I can make a difference where God isn't involved.



goodwitchy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Female
Posts: 785
Location: Interplanetary

22 Feb 2012, 11:45 pm

Fnord wrote:
Science is merely an extremely powerful method of winnowing what's true from what feels good. That is, supporting evidence must be validated before a claim can be accepted as a fact. Therefor, and unproven claim can not be accepted as a fact, and the claim itself is in doubt.

a. Absence of proof, while not proof of absence, is sufficient cause for reasonable doubt.
b. Faith is the belief in unprovable claims.
: : It is reasonable to doubt any and all faith-based claims.


I agree.
I think I wrote about doubt being normal in my second post on this thread.

But in science, they don't refer to initial scientific ideas as "faith", so what is it before a hypothesis is made?....just a proposed idea?, but that doesn't mean it's wrong, and it may or may not be provable.

And thank you, I'll borrow that > "absence of proof is not proof of absence".



Declension
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jan 2012
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,807

22 Feb 2012, 11:45 pm

goodwitchy wrote:
Okay, terminology is tricky.... before a hypothesis is made, initial thought exists that can lead to a belief.


Belief plays no part in science, on my view of science.

Science is the art of constructing theories, figuring out what observations would falsify them, and attempting to produce such observations.

On a secondary level, science is the art of combining theories into larger theories.