Similarities between Dread Pirate Roberts and Barack Obama..

Page 1 of 1 [ 14 posts ] 

Magneto
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jun 2009
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,086
Location: Blighty

03 Oct 2013, 1:40 pm

...and notable differences.

1. The Dread Pirate is alleged to have ordered the assassination of individuals. Barack Obama is confirmed to have done so.
2. Both had the organisations of which they're the heads of shut down by the government within hours of each other.
3. Barack Obama blames other people for his organisation being shut down. Other people are to blame for the shutting down of Silk Road.
4. Both are very unpopular with a lot of Americans.

Add more below.



Delphiki
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2012
Age: 181
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,415
Location: My own version of reality

03 Oct 2013, 1:44 pm

Magneto wrote:
3. Barack Obama blames other people for his organisation being shut down. Other people are to blame for the shutting down of Silk Road.
Add more below.


There can always be the blame for other people. Silk road it was DPR fault. He ordered a hit on someone, along with being lax about his internet footprint.

Obama is blaming the republicans. When in (american but in general) politics is not the other sides fault? (I do think it's the republicans fault for the shutdown, regardless of if they liked Obamacare or not)


_________________
Well you can go with that if you want.


Dox47
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,577
Location: Seattle-ish

03 Oct 2013, 2:05 pm

Differences: One of them is being held accountable for his crimes.


_________________
“The totally convinced and the totally stupid have too much in common for the resemblance to be accidental.”
-- Robert Anton Wilson


Shatbat
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Feb 2012
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,791
Location: Where two great rivers meet

03 Oct 2013, 2:16 pm

Pardon my ignorance, is that a Princess Bride reference I am not getting, or is there another Dread Pirate Roberts I am not aware of?


_________________
To build may have to be the slow and laborious task of years. To destroy can be the thoughtless act of a single day. - Winston Churchill


Delphiki
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2012
Age: 181
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,415
Location: My own version of reality

03 Oct 2013, 2:29 pm

Shatbat wrote:
Pardon my ignorance, is that a Princess Bride reference I am not getting, or is there another Dread Pirate Roberts I am not aware of?

Right to think that, but he is, well was, the current owner of the silk road.


_________________
Well you can go with that if you want.


Delphiki
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2012
Age: 181
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,415
Location: My own version of reality

03 Oct 2013, 2:31 pm

Dox47 wrote:
Differences: One of them is being held accountable for his crimes.
So what crime(s) did Obama commit that Bush would not be at fault for also?


_________________
Well you can go with that if you want.


thomas81
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 May 2012
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,147
Location: County Down, Northern Ireland

03 Oct 2013, 3:41 pm

still, on the plus side you could've ended up with Romney. You dodged a bullet there.


_________________
Being 'normal' is over rated.

My deviant art profile


Dox47
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,577
Location: Seattle-ish

03 Oct 2013, 3:47 pm

Delphiki wrote:
So what crime(s) did Obama commit that Bush would not be at fault for also?


I'm pretty sure Bush didn't telepathically force Obama to attack Libya in violation of international law, to name but one. Let's not forget those extrajudicial assassinations that he assures us are legal, but has classified the rationale behind either.


_________________
“The totally convinced and the totally stupid have too much in common for the resemblance to be accidental.”
-- Robert Anton Wilson


GGPViper
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,880

03 Oct 2013, 3:55 pm

Dox47 wrote:
Delphiki wrote:
So what crime(s) did Obama commit that Bush would not be at fault for also?

I'm pretty sure Bush didn't telepathically force Obama to attack Libya in violation of international law, to name but one. Let's not forget those extrajudicial assassinations that he assures us are legal, but has classified the rationale behind either.

I agree completely. History will not look kindly upon Obama for ordering the assassination of Osama Bin Laden.



Dox47
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,577
Location: Seattle-ish

03 Oct 2013, 4:05 pm

GGPViper wrote:
I agree completely. History will not look kindly upon Obama for ordering the assassination of Osama Bin Laden.


Bin Laden was more akin to someone killed while resisting arrest, I'm thinking more along the lines of Anwar al-Awlaki and his teenaged son, but you already knew that.


_________________
“The totally convinced and the totally stupid have too much in common for the resemblance to be accidental.”
-- Robert Anton Wilson


GGPViper
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,880

03 Oct 2013, 4:28 pm

Dox47 wrote:
GGPViper wrote:
I agree completely. History will not look kindly upon Obama for ordering the assassination of Osama Bin Laden.

Bin Laden was more akin to someone killed while resisting arrest, I'm thinking more along the lines of Anwar al-Awlaki and his teenaged son, but you already knew that.

I agree completely. History will not look kindly upon Obama for ordering the assassination of Anwar al-Awlaki.

And I'm sure the death of al-Awlaki's son (last time I checked, he is 1 out of 4 Americans killed by the US drone program) will overshadow the countless civilians killed in the wars started by George W. Bush.



Delphiki
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2012
Age: 181
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,415
Location: My own version of reality

03 Oct 2013, 5:38 pm

Dox47 wrote:
Delphiki wrote:
So what crime(s) did Obama commit that Bush would not be at fault for also?


I'm pretty sure Bush didn't telepathically force Obama to attack Libya in violation of international law, to name but one. Let's not forget those extrajudicial assassinations that he assures us are legal, but has classified the rationale behind either.

Lol because that's clearly what I meant.

But from this I saw that Obama and Bush have multiple reasons for why people think they should be impeached. Surprised Obama's list wasn't longer.


_________________
Well you can go with that if you want.


zacb
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 May 2012
Age: 29
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,158

03 Oct 2013, 8:18 pm

I agree. It reminds me of Murray Rothbard's comparison between a gang and a government. At least there was honor among thieves, unlike the government. Perhaps we could learn from this situation, and prove the point we need private courts for these issues, so people do not take justice into their own hand.



naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 69
Gender: Male
Posts: 34,156
Location: temperate zone

03 Oct 2013, 9:47 pm

Dox47 wrote:
Delphiki wrote:
So what crime(s) did Obama commit that Bush would not be at fault for also?


I'm pretty sure Bush didn't telepathically force Obama to attack Libya in violation of international law, to name but one. Let's not forget those extrajudicial assassinations that he assures us are legal, but has classified the rationale behind either.


Why are you slitting your own throat, and proving Delphiki right by mentioning Libya?

Maybe you didnt understand his question.

He asked "what crimes did obama commit that bush did NOT ALSO COMMIT?"

Not "How did Obama repeat the SAME crimes of Bush?"

Understand now?

Did you ever hear of a place called "Iraq"?

Attacking a foriegn country under the guise of regime change is an example of what Delphiki is talking about- Obama repeating Bush's crimes (foriegn agression under the guise of liberation). Both used chicanery and trickery to get around international law.



The main difference between the overtrhow of Khaddaffi, and that of Hussein was that that of Saddam Hussien required american boots on the ground and american blood. Obama got rid of khaddaffi by letting the locals do the heavy lifting and most of the dying.

So...are you suggesting that obama be impeached for not getting ENOUGH american soldiers killed? That its better have americans die than locals? Because that about the only real difference between his and bush's inteventionist foriegn policies.