auntblabby
Veteran
Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 113,750
Location: the island of defective toy santas
15 Mar 2011, 10:13 pm
Raptor wrote:
Seems to have an obsession with Limbaugh.....................hmmm. 
it is simply that folk such as yourself have made that man inordinately rich, from the rapt attention you pay to his toxic broadcasts.
15 Mar 2011, 11:13 pm
auntblabby wrote:
Raptor wrote:
Seems to have an obsession with Limbaugh.....................hmmm.
it is simply that folk such as yourself have made that man inordinately rich, from the rapt attention you pay to his toxic broadcasts.
Is that jealousy or is it you secretly have a crush on Rush.
16 Mar 2011, 12:38 am
auntblabby wrote:
AceOfSpades wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
whatever 
That's all? How about you explain why it is irrational to think that pacifism doesn't work if one side is uncompromising and willing to use force either as a means to a goal or as the goal itself? You keep harping about rationality, so how about bringing something to the table instead of just bailing out?are you a black-and-white thinker also? just because i mentioned that our military is among the most wasteful of taxpayer dollars of all armies in the world, you insist that i believe in total disarmament? just because i prefer that america avoid getting itself involved in foreign entanglements [that george washington warned us about] and figure out how to curb the military/industrial/congressional complex [that eisenhauer warned us about], that i must be automatically in favor of the invading commie hordes that wanna take away your guns and women? you are not making any sense to me, and i don't give a good god-damn if i'm not making any sense to you. go back to your rushiebaby teet.
1. Violence is wrong no matter what.
2. Aggressive use of violence is wrong but defensive use of violence is acceptable.
Show me where I stated or implied that you favoured disarmament. Libya, Iran, and North Korea are only being kept in check by the threat of force being used against em should they start getting imperial. That's not going on the offensive as you know it, it's more of a preemptive thing. Pacifism in both senses of the word is definitely not what's deterring em. And I never even checked Rush Limbaugh out, so how am I supposed to like or dislike him? Save the straw men for the crows. So you don't give a s**t about making sense to me? Am I supposed to lose sleep over something that's your loss? I don't see the point of making a point without making sure it has been made clearly.
Oh and have fun with Michael Moore's moobs. Out of all of em, you chose him? He's a complete joke.
16 Mar 2011, 5:40 pm
auntblabby wrote:
Raptor wrote:
Seems to have an obsession with Limbaugh.....................hmmm.
it is simply that folk such as yourself have made that man inordinately rich, from the rapt attention you pay to his toxic broadcasts.
At least he did something to earn it his wealth. Personally, I don't listen to his broadcasts that much but of those that I have heard at least made sense.
I guess by "toxic broadcasts" you mean that he dilutes the daily liberal sludge with logic and truth.
So i guess in a round about way that would be a toxin to what you like to hear.
Get a life.
auntblabby
Veteran
Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 113,750
Location: the island of defective toy santas
16 Mar 2011, 8:01 pm
auntblabby
Veteran
Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 113,750
Location: the island of defective toy santas
16 Mar 2011, 8:03 pm
auntblabby
Veteran
Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 113,750
Location: the island of defective toy santas
16 Mar 2011, 8:12 pm
Inuyasha wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
Raptor wrote:
Seems to have an obsession with Limbaugh.....................hmmm.
it is simply that folk such as yourself have made that man inordinately rich, from the rapt attention you pay to his toxic broadcasts.
Is that jealousy or is it you secretly have a crush on Rush.
you are a hypocrite and an intellectual thug, because out of your smartalec know-it-all mouth issue both your jejune insults as well as your bewailing that other posters are supposedly insulting you just because they took umbrage at your insulting them. you have your nerve. instead of saying why you believe we need to keep spending a bankrupting fortune on the military/industrial complex, you just dump on me instead. instead of anything remotely constructive, you just hijack a thread instead. you wouldn't know civil decency if it kissed you on the mouth.
16 Mar 2011, 8:13 pm
16 Mar 2011, 8:20 pm
auntblabby wrote:
Raptor wrote:
Get a life.
you first, bully.
I've never considered myslef a bully but coming from you it's actually a compliment.
Thanks,
The Bully
auntblabby
Veteran
Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 113,750
Location: the island of defective toy santas
16 Mar 2011, 8:27 pm
Raptor wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
Raptor wrote:
Get a life.
you first, bully.
I've never considered myslef a bully but coming from you it's actually a compliment.
Thanks,
The Bully
rather than expressing your pride in something so ignoble, why don't you do something novel instead, like offering your relevant opinion of why it is proper to waste a bankrupting fortune on our present military system? or why you believe the doctrine of permanent war is a morally good thing. or anything actually relavent to the original reason for this thread, instead of acting like a rowdy teenage boy throwing paper airplanes?
16 Mar 2011, 9:02 pm
auntblabby wrote:
Raptor wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
Raptor wrote:
Get a life.
you first, bully.
I've never considered myslef a bully but coming from you it's actually a compliment.
Thanks,
The Bully
rather than expressing your pride in something so ignoble, why don't you do something novel instead, like offering your relevant opinion of why it is proper to waste a bankrupting fortune on our present military system? or why you believe the doctrine of permanent war is a morally good thing. or anything actually relavent to the original reason for this thread, instead of acting like a rowdy teenage boy throwing paper airplanes?
16 Mar 2011, 9:31 pm
AceOfSpades wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
Raptor wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
Raptor wrote:
Get a life.
you first, bully.
I've never considered myslef a bully but coming from you it's actually a compliment.
Thanks,
The Bully
rather than expressing your pride in something so ignoble, why don't you do something novel instead, like offering your relevant opinion of why it is proper to waste a bankrupting fortune on our present military system? or why you believe the doctrine of permanent war is a morally good thing. or anything actually relavent to the original reason for this thread, instead of acting like a rowdy teenage boy throwing paper airplanes?
Quote:
You are obviously not inviting a mature discussion by discrediting dissenting opinions like that. How relevant can dissenting opinions be with the way you said it? And I have given my two cents on it, yet you haven't addressed it and instead went on some ad hominem rant.
Hell, the OP is a childish and inflammatory cartoon that begs attack. Someone posts a reply that's counter to the opinion of auntblabby (WTF kind of name is that, anyway???) and all the sudden they are bullies and/or war mongers.
I think what we have here is someone who goes through life wearing a neon "kick me" sign front and back.
16 Mar 2011, 10:28 pm
auntblabby
Veteran
Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 113,750
Location: the island of defective toy santas
16 Mar 2011, 10:41 pm
auntblabby
Veteran
Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 113,750
Location: the island of defective toy santas
16 Mar 2011, 10:58 pm
auntblabby
Veteran
Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 113,750
Location: the island of defective toy santas
16 Mar 2011, 11:11 pm
