Jacoby wrote:
Not sure why it's a coup if they're working within their constitution, granted I don't know who's fingers are in this. It's not even like in Honduras where the military literally removed the president from the country. I'm not sure if it's at all warranted but I don't think it's grossly illegal at least on the surface. They voted to impeach the president and remove him from office and Lugo accepted the ruling while disagreeing with it obviously.
Hopefully the US isn't involved and won't get involved going forward.
Impeachment is meant to lead to a trial before parliament, and trials, as legal proceedings, are open to criticism on grounds of due process, which is the objection being leveled here.
Quote:
As the outcry over the deadly clash continued, the liberal party announced Thursday that it was withdrawing its support of Lugo, and an impeachment vote was heard in the lower chamber of Congress that day. The vote in favor of impeachment was 76-1.
The next day, Lugo's defense team had two hours to defend Lugo from what it called vague charges of incompetence. The Senate impeached the president in a 39-4 vote.
....
Quote:
The Mexican Foreign Ministry and Chavez of Venezuela said the speed with which Lugo was removed didn't give him time to mount a proper defense.
http://www.cnn.com/2012/06/25/world/ame ... index.html
That said, I don't think the "trial" in a presidential impeachment is generally that important, it always comes down to politics rather than merit (I think this was the case with Johnson in the U.S.), in this case they just skipped the judicial pretense in a very blatant way.
You'd think they would have subpoenaed relevant documents to serve as evidence in regard to whatever the charge was if it was really solid though. I don't see why there was such a rush.
_________________
AQ 40. EQ 10/SQ 92. AS 184/NT 18. dx.