Touretter wrote:
I'm dyscalculic as well. I especially do not like the
Pythagorean theorem. I think that it resembles religious dogma too much. I mean why should I just accept Pythagora's rules without questian?
Erm...perhaps because you've just shown me the Mathematical proof of it?
That's why you should accept it. Take the the length of Opposite and Adjacent sides. Square them so that there are visually two squares. Add these areas together and you get the Square of the Hypotenuse. It's sometimes better to think about potentially confusing ideas such as this visually and draw a diagram. That's how I learned it.
Oh Pythagoras was a funny chap alright. Drowning his students when they disagreed with him.
At the mention that there were such things as "irrational numbers" he'd get very angry.
He made them all eat beans too.
He thought that all odd numbers were male and all even numbers were female.
Well he was a Maths teacher...
Touretter wrote:
Same goes for Euclid. I'm the type of guy who needs proofs, not just formulas.
Euclid wrote proofs too. If he hadn't, everyone would still be trying to cross all the bridges at Konigsberg once and only once!
Euclid also wrote "pseudo-mathematical proofs" about God existing as a joke.
You can't prove that God exists using Maths!
That didn't stop everyone (momentarily) believing Euclid though!
Last edited by AmberEyes on 30 Nov 2008, 12:48 pm, edited 2 times in total.