I guess it's really a case by case basis. If you could barely tie your shoes and sensory processing problems prevent you from saying even the most basic words and stepping outside, then yes, you might want to be cured. Then again I can't speak for those individuals because there's no way for any one of us to truly know what they're feeling.
I agree with you, I would not want to cure myself either, but neither of us are profoundly negatively effected, seeing as we're both able to go on this site and type. What do you think about this article:
Cure for autism?
It seems as though they're actually trying to cure mental retardation, which is something I can support, but this particular quote alarms me: "Prior to treatment they showed signs of hyperactivity, purposeless and repetitive movements."
So what aspect of autism are they actually trying to cure? At least in humans, I don't think the repetitive movements are necessarily bad, and how does one judge when something is "purposeless"? As with the prenatal testing mentioned earlier, these developments are not necessarily progress. You have an equal chance of having an autistic child who is a genius, and an autistic child who struggles to put on his socks. Either way, I'd rather take that chance when I have my own kids.
Here is the layman's version.
It sounds shoddy to me. In a perfect world, we would be researching to understand those who are profoundly effected, but not cure them.
_________________
Here's to the crazy ones. The misfits. The rebels. The troublemakers. The round pegs in the square holes. The ones who see things differently.
Last edited by rabidmonkey4262 on 04 Apr 2011, 10:46 pm, edited 2 times in total.