James Holmes may have Aspergers?
Verdandi
Veteran
Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,275
Location: University of California Sunnydale (fictional location - Real location Olympia, WA)
Sweetleaf
Veteran
Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 34,477
Location: Somewhere in Colorado
However, "normal" people don't go on shooting sprees. Someone does something like this, they are almost certainly diagnosable with something.
I disagree, that is exactly the sort of generalization that keeps the stigma against mental illness going. Why cant a normal person commit such a crime? I mean I don't belive they are over all morally superior to mentally ill people or that they cannot do horrible things. Just look at Nazi Germany or the Salem Witch trials. You want to say everyone involved in things like that were 'messed up in the head.'
Now I understand the sort of logic behind the comment that one girl made to me during a lock down.....I was 'quiet', 'different', 'smart' and a loner(though not by choice) so she was surprised I wasn't the psychopath with the gun. When it is a mentally ill person who does it though maybe its this sort of stigma that alienates them even further. But being filled with hate and killing is not a mental illness it is unfortunately something all humans are capable of.
_________________
We won't go back.
I think it is possible yes aspies can have trouble socialising with isolation and bullying. Of course that is never an excuse to do what JH did but it may if he is aspie and or other things go some way to explaining his state of mind. If aspies are pushed hard enough like everyone they can snap. I have been critisisised personally by people elsewhere for suggesting it but I am not the only one to say it as is expressed here. Some are aspies like anyone can go bad it doesn't mean all aspies are bad. If you type in James Holmes Asperger's into google you will see there is al ot of speculation on this.
Verdandi
Veteran
Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,275
Location: University of California Sunnydale (fictional location - Real location Olympia, WA)
If you've read the other thread that discussed this same topic, you would know that I do not think James Holmes has any mental illness at all. Mentally ill people in general are more likely to be targeted for violence than commit it.
A "normal" person is unlikely to commit such a crime for a variety of reasons - most of them virtually identical to the reasons that mentally ill people are unlikely to commit such a crime. The kind of murder you see from most people are crimes of passion - that is, often impulsive and likely fueled by emotion. You're not going to find such people spending months quietly planning a murder spree.
I believe that you believe that, but I do not think it is true. The simple fact is if most people were capable of this, it would happen significantly more often than it actually does.
I think most humans are capable of killing. I do not think most humans are capable of killing in the way James Holmes approached it.
Sweetleaf
Veteran
Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 34,477
Location: Somewhere in Colorado
If you've read the other thread that discussed this same topic, you would know that I do not think James Holmes has any mental illness at all. Mentally ill people in general are more likely to be targeted for violence than commit it.
A "normal" person is unlikely to commit such a crime for a variety of reasons - most of them virtually identical to the reasons that mentally ill people are unlikely to commit such a crime. The kind of murder you see from most people are crimes of passion - that is, often impulsive and likely fueled by emotion. You're not going to find such people spending months quietly planning a murder spree.
I believe that you believe that, but I do not think it is true. The simple fact is if most people were capable of this, it would happen significantly more often than it actually does.
I think most humans are capable of killing. I do not think most humans are capable of killing in the way James Holmes approached it.
What I mean is both people with and without mental disorders are capable of doing terrible things like this...not that the majority of either group is more capable of it. What I more mean is I think anyone could probably be pushed to the point of doing something like that or even just go along with it if its deemed socially acceptable(hence it being socially acceptable to discriminate against various groups in nazi germany for instance). Also I think some people are sadists who enjoy inflicting pain on others...which isn't nessisarily a mental illness I mean even people who bully are behaving sadistically too some degree.
_________________
We won't go back.
Verdandi
Veteran
Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,275
Location: University of California Sunnydale (fictional location - Real location Olympia, WA)
I know that you meant that, but I do not agree with it. The idea of people being pushed to an extreme and snapping is cultural mythology. It doesn't really happen. The people who do appear to snap tend to have something seriously wrong with their brains (such as the brain tumor referenced for the UT clock tower shooter earlier in this thread), or they tend to be psychopathic or sociopathic.
If you read about the Milgram experiments, they do not demonstrate that anyone can do something monstrous. Instead, they demonstrate that when an authority figure tells them to continue, many do despite what their conscience tells them. This is not the same thing.
Someone who enjoys inflicting nonconsensual pain on others is not normal. They are outside the range of normal.
Discrimination is horrible and people who perpetrate it do refuse to acknowledge the effects of their prejudices and hatreds, and tend to blame the targets for being targets in the first place. However, I doubt that most "normal" people would "snap" and start shooting up gay people or black people or disabled people.
What happened in Nazi Germany is not as simple as "everyone went along with it." But what did happen is in line with Milgram's experiments: People who did go along with it did so because authority said that's the way things were to be. However, many resisted to varying degrees.
You're conflating several issues into one single thing.
Sweetleaf
Veteran
Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 34,477
Location: Somewhere in Colorado
I know that you meant that, but I do not agree with it. The idea of people being pushed to an extreme and snapping is cultural mythology. It doesn't really happen. The people who do appear to snap tend to have something seriously wrong with their brains (such as the brain tumor referenced for the UT clock tower shooter earlier in this thread), or they tend to be psychopathic or sociopathic.
I don't think this guy was pushed to an extreme and snapped......I think people can be pushed to an extreme and snap, but I doubt it would resemble this incident with the whole planning it out for months thing. Also I don't see why a psychopath or sociopath would have to 'snap' to do something like that...however I think most people mentally ill or not could certainly be pushed to snap and act violently but I doubt it would be in such an organized planned out manner.
If you read about the Milgram experiments, they do not demonstrate that anyone can do something monstrous. Instead, they demonstrate that when an authority figure tells them to continue, many do despite what their conscience tells them. This is not the same thing.
To me that experiment does show normal people are capable of terrible things...I mean authority figure or not why would you continue inflicting extreme pain on someone like they were made to think they were doing for the experiment. That would be the whole thing with it being 'socially acceptable' and thus ok even if their conscience said no.
Someone who enjoys inflicting nonconsensual pain on others is not normal. They are outside the range of normal.
Maybe, but what about those who go along with it?.......for instance when I was the outcast in school who got bullied, I don't think the kids who joined in with the bullying out of wanting to remain popular were to upset by their bullying of me. Also maybe most people do not necessarily enjoy inflicting pain on others directly but humans even the normal ones can be cruel, to always pin it on the mentally ill is BS in my opinion.
Discrimination is horrible and people who perpetrate it do refuse to acknowledge the effects of their prejudices and hatreds, and tend to blame the targets for being targets in the first place. However, I doubt that most "normal" people would "snap" and start shooting up gay people or black people or disabled people.
Neither would most 'mentally ill/disordered' people.
What happened in Nazi Germany is not as simple as "everyone went along with it." But what did happen is in line with Milgram's experiments: People who did go along with it did so because authority said that's the way things were to be. However, many resisted to varying degrees.
You're conflating several issues into one single thing.
I know that, I was just using it as an example that normal people can be capable of terrible things like mass shootings, discrimination against specific groups and even burning fellow humans to death at the stake. I don't see how I am confusing several issues into a single thing I am well aware these are separate issues its not like I think all this is directly connected I was using examples of people doing terrible things throughout history.
_________________
We won't go back.
Sweetleaf
Veteran
Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 34,477
Location: Somewhere in Colorado
Well considering its unlikely all who play with bombs have autism, I imagine they aren't the only group....even neurotypicals have obsessions and talents. So I don't really see the connection there really.
_________________
We won't go back.
the only thing that can come out of this is stigma. for the same reason i don't tell people i have SLD. the only thing worse than people not knowing what something is, is when people think they know what something is.
if i tell some one close to me that i have learning disabilities, i mite as well tell them i have an IQ of 10. because that's what they think it is
i would hate for people to be wary of people that have aspergers because of an associations to violent behavior.
for some resin aspergers is in the Media quite frequently anymore. tack Glee and South Park for instance. thees are NOT positive portrays.
you do not want people to think of you as a sociopath if you are quiet and don't know how to flirt.
i do not think he is autistic. and if he happens to be, i hope it never goes public.
I bet he does.
For some people, social isolation makes them..."crazy"; ASDs don't change people's innate desire for such. Some are lucky in that they don't care all that much about social isolation, whereas others seem to be really bothered by it.
Martin Bryant and Anders Brevik have such, and an argument can be made for Cho. All were socially isolated.
If anything he is a Sociopath. Which is a term that was made up so that as has been said, he can be disassociated from "normal" people because it would make them uncomfortable to think that someone of sound mind like they view themselves could commit such a heinous crime
_________________
AQ test =36: SQ test = 110: EQ test =8
Aspire quiz: Aspire score = 162; Neurotypical =42
RAADS=173 Total: Language= 10: social relatedness= 92: Sensory/motor= 37: Circumscribed interests=34
I'm waiting to see the details of his personal life.
because it equals Media sensationalism and scapegoating! also creates a false sense of comfort for the NT majority
_________________
AQ test =36: SQ test = 110: EQ test =8
Aspire quiz: Aspire score = 162; Neurotypical =42
RAADS=173 Total: Language= 10: social relatedness= 92: Sensory/motor= 37: Circumscribed interests=34
Verdandi
Veteran
Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,275
Location: University of California Sunnydale (fictional location - Real location Olympia, WA)
Most people just flip out a bit and it's over. Very few flip out and kill someone. Practically no one snaps and sets out to go on a killing spree.
As far as psychopaths and sociopaths, there are numerous instances of them killing people after getting fired, splitting up, getting a restraining order, etc. Most psychopaths and sociopaths never kill or even physically injure anyone, however.
As it turns out, the authority figure (in Milgram's experiment, a man in a white lab coat) is pretty crucial to this. Without a clear authority figure, people are significantly less likely to comply. Also, adding another person who objects tends to break whatever it is that keeps people going at it, and they'll object right along with that person.
If you think the experiments demonstrated that anyone could just decide to go do horrible things, you badly misunderstood them.
I am not pinning it on the mentally ill. I said I do not think James Holmes is mentally ill. I do not know what you are responding to, but I said the exact opposite of what you're complaining about. And for the record, I am mentally ill.
I actually made this exact point earlier.
Because while most people are capable of doing certain kinds of horrible things under certain conditions, it does not reflect a general tendency to just go off and do any kind of horrible things at will. And when I say "most people" I am also referring to people with mental illnesses who as I swear I have said more than once, are more likely to be targeted for violence than be the cause of it.
Last edited by Verdandi on 24 Jul 2012, 1:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
Its easy for us to appreciate how 'bullycide' works
This is similar. Yet we struggle to accept our own can become heinous murderers
In new zealand we have recently been promoting anti bullying measures [esp, regarding facebook, texting and social media]
due the the high incidence of young people committing suicide after being bullied publicly via websites
recently groups of young people [who know each other, from small towns] have been killing themselves
one by one over the space of a few months....
I sincerely hope progressive measures are implemented.
Otherwise bullycide and mass murders will become more frequent in our societies.... 'normal' 'aspie' or 'whatever'
Sweetleaf
Veteran
Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 34,477
Location: Somewhere in Colorado
Most people just flip out a bit and it's over. Very few flip out and kill someone. Practically no one snaps and sets out to go on a killing spree.
As far as psychopaths and sociopaths, there are numerous instances of them killing people after getting fired, splitting up, getting a restraining order, etc. Most psychopaths and sociopaths never kill or even physically injure anyone, however.
True.
As it turns out, the authority figure (in Milgram's experiment, a man in a white lab coat) is pretty crucial to this. Without a clear authority figure, people are significantly less likely to comply. Also, adding another person who objects tends to break whatever it is that keeps people going at it, and they'll object right along with that person.
If you think the experiments demonstrated that anyone could just decide to go do horrible things, you badly misunderstood them.
That is not quite what I meant, just that it proves normal people can be capable of hurting others or even killing them(if I remember the experiment right, though I know no one in the experiment was actually killed). I am not saying most people could just up and decide to go on a killing spree they would either have to be pushed to that point, following an authority figure who says it's ok, or already have sadistic tendencies at least in my opinion...though even then one could develop such tendencies depending on their environment even if that is not how they were to begin with.
I am not pinning it on the mentally ill. I said I do not think James Holmes is mentally ill. I do not know what you are responding to, but I said the exact opposite of what you're complaining about. And for the record, I am mentally ill.
I actually made this exact point earlier.
Because while most people are capable of doing certain kinds of horrible things under certain conditions, it does not reflect a general tendency to just go off and do any kind of horrible things at will. And when I say "most people" I am also referring to people with mental illnesses who as I swear I have said more than once, are more likely to be targeted for violence than the cause of it.
alright sorry I'm awesome at reading apparently.....I'll go back and try and find what I was responding to, it looked like you were saying people with mental illnesses were more likely to be violent and I was also just kind of speaking generally others have tried making that connection so that wasn't entirely directed at you so I guess I misunderstood.
_________________
We won't go back.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Aspergers and Serious |
14 Apr 2024, 3:59 am |
Aspergers |
26 Feb 2024, 11:05 pm |
Aspergers & Energy |
07 Apr 2024, 5:11 pm |
Aspergers & Living On Your Own |
26 Feb 2024, 9:28 pm |