Should we stop using the term Autism to avoid discrimination
There are a lot of negative stereotypes towards people on the Autism spectrum. A lot of people are ignorant enough about Aspergers and Autism that it'd probably be beneficial to just not use the terms anymore and not let anyone know that we're on the spectrum. Why don't we just classify ourselves as Asocials or Introverts? Then people wouldn't know if we were Aspies, Autistics, Schizoids, Schizotypals, or Avoidants, and they would only be able to guess at it. And they probably wouldn't guess that we're on the spectrum because their ideas about what Aspergers and Autism are don't describe us very well. People would still think that we're Sociopaths and Misanthropes, but a lot of the other negative stereotypes wouldn't be applied to us anymore. We'd probably be better off if we just threw out the terms Autism and Aspergers, and gave ourselves a cleaner slate to work with. No one would ever be able to know for sure that we had it unless they saw our diagnosis papers, and even then they might doubt it.
No, I'm not convinced that doing away with the word autism would solve the problem you describe here.
First of all, I believe that any form of discrimination should not be avoided, but rather confronted so that it can be blown out into the open for the unfair treatment that it is.
Secondly, not nearly every person on the autistic spectrum can hide their autism or Asperger's. There are many who stand out because their motoric issues or verbal impairments are so obvious and beyond their control that they will be easily recognisable as autistic, or -to the layman- as 'off'. Besides that, there are many relatively mild autistics who exhibit quirks like lack of eye contact, stims, unconvential body language or lack of body language, verbal tics. Many can't just switch that off.
If those of us who can 'pass' as 'normal' or a semblance thereof, were to choose to identify ourselves as 'asocial' or 'introverted' instead of autistic, we might end up trivializing our own problems, and in turn be held to a standard which, in certain situations, we can't measure up to because we lack the mental hardware to do so.
That is not to say that it is in all cases absolutely negative to say were 'introverted', 'shy', 'unsociable' instead of saying we're autistic in EVERY situation, IF we can 'pass'. In fact, I have myself chosen to call myself 'shy', 'introverted', etc. when I thought it would be irrelevant or even disadvantageous for me to mention I'm autistic. There are many people who, upon learning from me that I am autistic, are surprised, saying that it doesn't show and that they find me a relatively social person. And I consider that a great compliment.
So, in short, no, I don't think it's the way to go to avoid the word autism, although I do find it unnecessary -for myself at least- to mention I'm autistic now that I've made the progress I've made.
_________________
clarity of thought before rashness of action
CuriousKitten
Velociraptor
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Age: 64
Gender: Female
Posts: 487
Location: Deep South USA
The cure for ignorance is education. What we need is for more people to stand up and be counted, . . . to show that there is more to Autism than just the problems and quirks.
_________________
If it don't come easy . . . .
. . . .hack it until it works right
Aspie score: 142/200 NT score: 64/200
AQ Score: 42
BAP: 109 aloof, 94 rigid and 85 pragmatic
Sweetleaf
Veteran
Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 34,484
Location: Somewhere in Colorado
No, I'm not convinced that doing away with the word autism would solve the problem you describe here.
First of all, I believe that any form of discrimination should not be avoided, but rather confronted so that it can be blown out into the open for the unfair treatment that it is.
Secondly, not nearly every person on the autistic spectrum can hide their autism or Asperger's. There are many who stand out because their motoric issues or verbal impairments are so obvious and beyond their control that they will be easily recognisable as autistic, or -to the layman- as 'off'. Besides that, there are many relatively mild autistics who exhibit quirks like lack of eye contact, stims, unconvential body language or lack of body language, verbal tics. Many can't just switch that off.
If those of us who can 'pass' as 'normal' or a semblance thereof, were to choose to identify ourselves as 'asocial' or 'introverted' instead of autistic, we might end up trivializing our own problems, and in turn be held to a standard which, in certain situations, we can't measure up to because we lack the mental hardware to do so.
That is not to say that it is in all cases absolutely negative to say were 'introverted', 'shy', 'unsociable' instead of saying we're autistic in EVERY situation, IF we can 'pass'. In fact, I have myself chosen to call myself 'shy', 'introverted', etc. when I thought it would be irrelevant or even disadvantageous for me to mention I'm autistic. There are many people who, upon learning from me that I am autistic, are surprised, saying that it doesn't show and that they find me a relatively social person. And I consider that a great compliment.
So, in short, no, I don't think it's the way to go to avoid the word autism, although I do find it unnecessary -for myself at least- to mention I'm autistic now that I've made the progress I've made.
I agree. I wish high functioning Aspies would remember that their experiences are not those of everyone on the spectrum. But then, self-centredness is a symptom of AS.
Sweetleaf
Veteran
Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 34,484
Location: Somewhere in Colorado
Is that so, because one of my problems is focusing too much on other peoples needs and feelings while neglecting my own.
_________________
We won't go back.
A rose by any other name is still a rose.
_________________
One Day At A Time.
His first book: http://www.amazon.com/Wetland-Other-Sto ... B00E0NVTL2
His second book: https://www.amazon.com/COMMONER-VAGABON ... oks&sr=1-2
His blog: http://seattlewordsmith.wordpress.com/
'Rainbow disorder' would be a step in the right direction for all parties involved. The rainbow represents a spectrum, is also a symbol of positivity, and masks that we're talking about something DIRE.
_________________
clarity of thought before rashness of action
I`d think emotional autism, and high functioning autism would be the best.
Those facing language issues, and other sensory problems would be HFA, and emotional autism would be for those that have issue with socialization.
We need a rather surgical word, and I think those are it.
Has calling homosexuals "Gays" stopped discrimination against them?
Has calling some people "African-Americans" stopped discrimination against them?
Would the word "Hyperadipose" end discrimination toward obese people?
Does being called "Pre-Adolescent" end discrimination against children?
Autism is autism, no matter what else you call it, and autistics will be discriminated against no matter how you label their condition.
_________________
Absolutely not.
I am autistic. If autistic people are mistreated, I will fight for them. I will not leave my brothers and sisters behind by claiming to have no association with them just to escape mistreatment myself.
If you think that disassociating yourself with the oppressed is a solution to oppression, then either you have lost the will to fight, or you are a coward.
_________________
Reports from a Resident Alien:
http://chaoticidealism.livejournal.com
Autism Memorial:
http://autism-memorial.livejournal.com
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Is it immature that I avoid TV-MA? |
01 May 2024, 12:06 pm |
Alright. This needs to STOP. |
02 Apr 2024, 10:14 am |
How do you stop over-analyzing situations? |
23 Mar 2024, 4:02 am |
How do you stop rabbits from multiplying? |
09 Mar 2024, 10:11 pm |