The mathematics of why I can't get a girlfriend

Page 2 of 3 [ 40 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

LoveableNerd
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 23 Apr 2008
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 380
Location: USA

25 May 2008, 12:20 pm

JohnHopkins wrote:
Actually, I'd put my money on you seeing relationships as maths being a reason why you can't get a girlfriend :P Unless this thread is entirely tongue in cheek.


I disagree. I think math can explain the entire process very succinctly. See my simplified equation below:

Image

And yes, that was entirely tongue-in-cheek so lighten up guys and gals.


_________________
Reasonable people adapt themselves to the world. Unreasonable people attempt to adapt the world to themselves. All progress, therefore, depends on unreasonable people.---George Bernard Shaw

8th Cmdmt: Thou Shalt Not Steal.


ToadOfSteel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,157
Location: New Jersey

25 May 2008, 10:54 pm

I think i'm too fA(t)...



Deus_Imperator
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 13 Jun 2007
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 360
Location: Australia

26 May 2008, 7:04 pm

Clever theory. I like it :twisted:


_________________
Vale Omnes


twoshots
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Nov 2007
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,731
Location: Boötes void

26 May 2008, 7:45 pm

pakled wrote:
when considering love and romance...you need to use irrational numbers...;)

Part of it may be doing math like this at home, instead of finding someone you can get along with. And that can be harder than any sort of math you can name...;)

God that's trite.


_________________
* here for the nachos.


Cyberman
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Apr 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,736
Location: hibernating

26 May 2008, 7:54 pm

LoveableNerd wrote:
JohnHopkins wrote:
Actually, I'd put my money on you seeing relationships as maths being a reason why you can't get a girlfriend :P Unless this thread is entirely tongue in cheek.


I disagree. I think math can explain the entire process very succinctly. See my simplified equation below:

Image

And yes, that was entirely tongue-in-cheek so lighten up guys and gals.


But I thought OPIUM was money... :lol:



veruniel
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 19 May 2008
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 290
Location: England

27 May 2008, 7:36 am

Thomas1138 wrote:
<shakes head>

Guys don't have the option of prettying ourselves up and waiting to attract someone.

But that's precisely what my last boyfriend did!



Hector
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Mar 2008
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,493

27 May 2008, 11:22 am

On a more serious note, simple probability theory can demonstrate that even if your chances of success with a girl you ask out are consistently slim, the likelihood of eventually getting a date increases quickly with multiple attempts with different women.



tharn
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 21 Apr 2008
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 168
Location: Iowa

27 May 2008, 11:42 am

gsilver wrote:
I'm bored, so I'm pulling a theory out of a hat...


I like the cut of yer jib there, matey! :D Your willingness to pursue such a complex topic using mathematics speaks well of you. But can a simple, algebraic formula really capture the subtlety and romance of the human heart? Can it anticipate those first, sweet moments where anything can happen? No, sir. I think not.

It's obvious that what you need here is matrix mathematics. Yes, everything from preferences to statistics loaded onto the back of a little card - much like a business card. Then just multiply in Current TV Trends, a bit of Chaos, and Willingness to Settle. Two potential lovers meet, swap cards, whip out a TI-85, crunch the matrices, and see if the result is within a standard deviation on the bell curve. Anyone who can't do the math shouldn't mate... but if they MUST, they should appeal to the Gods of Chance - both roll 1D20. If both roll above 10, it was meant to be. If either rolls a natural 20, they should make out on the spot. If either rolls a 1, they must trip on a projecting stone, stumble into a flaming pit of vipers, and impale themselves on their sword, a la Dungeons and Dragons.

Obviously, Romeo and Juliet wouldn't have been able to do the math - what with them being, like, 14, born before it was taught in schools, and also fictional. But if they'd bothered to roll the dice, I think they would have both come up "1"'s.



twoshots
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Nov 2007
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,731
Location: Boötes void

27 May 2008, 1:01 pm

twoshots wrote:
pakled wrote:
when considering love and romance...you need to use irrational numbers...;)

Part of it may be doing math like this at home, instead of finding someone you can get along with. And that can be harder than any sort of math you can name...;)

God that's trite.

Yet I think it would be more appropriate to say that one should use complex numbers. In the case of many people on this board, it would best be modeled with the numbers being purely imaginary.


_________________
* here for the nachos.


Hector
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Mar 2008
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,493

27 May 2008, 3:25 pm

The problem with the theories here isn't so much that the mathematics used is wrong (though there are a few logical fallacies so far) so much that it is wildly abused. The questions of this thread aren't to do with pure mathematics so much as applied, so you need a theory that is sufficiently well-grounded in reality to begin with.



mouapp
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 20 Mar 2007
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 499
Location: probably not WP

27 May 2008, 10:38 pm

tharn wrote:
gsilver wrote:
I'm bored, so I'm pulling a theory out of a hat...


I like the cut of yer jib there, matey! :D Your willingness to pursue such a complex topic using mathematics speaks well of you. But can a simple, algebraic formula really capture the subtlety and romance of the human heart? Can it anticipate those first, sweet moments where anything can happen? No, sir. I think not.

It's obvious that what you need here is matrix mathematics. Yes, everything from preferences to statistics loaded onto the back of a little card - much like a business card. Then just multiply in Current TV Trends, a bit of Chaos, and Willingness to Settle. Two potential lovers meet, swap cards, whip out a TI-85, crunch the matrices, and see if the result is within a standard deviation on the bell curve. Anyone who can't do the math shouldn't mate... but if they MUST, they should appeal to the Gods of Chance - both roll 1D20. If both roll above 10, it was meant to be. If either rolls a natural 20, they should make out on the spot. If either rolls a 1, they must trip on a projecting stone, stumble into a flaming pit of vipers, and impale themselves on their sword, a la Dungeons and Dragons.

Obviously, Romeo and Juliet wouldn't have been able to do the math - what with them being, like, 14, born before it was taught in schools, and also fictional. But if they'd bothered to roll the dice, I think they would have both come up "1"'s.

god, thats hilarious


this reminds me of an xkcd comic but i cant find it now, in theory I'd say its possible to make it um .. theory, but there is allot of variables that you would probably have to put down to chance ... well i would anyway seeing as i have trouble assessing things like her current mood


_________________
http://www.last.fm/user/mouapp/
Maybe I don't know either.


Vexcalibur
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jan 2008
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,398

27 May 2008, 10:54 pm

How about you make a javascript calculator for this?


_________________
.


merr
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Oct 2007
Age: 37
Gender: Female
Posts: 515

27 May 2008, 11:52 pm

Thomas1138 wrote:
caramateo wrote:
that's why you don't get a girlfriend

I'm an aspie woman that hates looking girly and doing things like nails, hairdo's, and fashion. but I did all of that to get a boyfriend.
use your intelligence


<shakes head>

Guys don't have the option of prettying ourselves up and waiting to attract someone.
You say that, but it's amazing what a well fitting nicely put together outfit, a nice hair cut that suits you and a smile does for attracting women.



EvilKimEvil
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Sep 2007
Age: 45
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,671

28 May 2008, 12:59 am

I wrote this post about what I think women find attractive in men. I thought I had explained it pretty well so I made it a blog entry:

http://www.wrongplanet.net/modules.php?name=Journal&file=display&jid=7142

Too bad the paragraphs don't seem to translate to the blogs - it's just one long block of text, but I think it contains useful information that could be turned into a mathematical equation if you wanted to see it that way.



DiabloDave363
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 May 2008
Age: 30
Gender: Male
Posts: 544
Location: New England

28 May 2008, 11:20 pm

i see
well my prob was my past. i had been an annoying ugly fat ass for the last 11 years but cleaned up over the summer. and ive hit 1st and had 4 GFs since sept. thats cause im fit now.
really people still think i am the exact way i was in the past. they're closed minded. ive asked lots of people wat they think of me now and they all say normal. so mine it tainted relations with the popular kids. GET ON THE POPULAR KIDS' SIDE! i cannot stress that enough.



tharn
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 21 Apr 2008
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 168
Location: Iowa

29 May 2008, 12:35 pm

I still say an insanely convoluted system involving matrices would work better. Besides, I keep away from the popular kids not because they dislike me, but because I have no respect for THEM. And I certainly wouldn't go out with the type of girl who would go out with me because I rub elbows with the popular kids. Ick.