Asperger's/Autism Love Success Stories (Sticky)

Page 3 of 3 [ 34 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

kojot
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 17 Feb 2012
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 95

02 Mar 2012, 5:31 am

Chooty wrote:
I disagree with the idea that people with asperger are less attentive/affectionate. Maybe in general it's true, but I am by a miles lead the more affectionate partner in my relationship, very flirty & attentive.

I guess succes start by aiming for the right person, something that could help a lot o people who are struggeling.


I second that. I'm very attentive and affectionate. To the point of obsession.

mv wrote:
I also disagree a bit with Attwood. Firstly, there's almost nothing on women with Aspergers and what little there is, is hopelessly pigeonholed. For example, I have a very healthy sex drive, even post-children. Also, I may be naive in some respects, but I'm very worldly in others.


Yes, I was just beginning to think maybe I'm the only one ;) I have very high sex drive and very good sex life, passionate and intense.



kojot
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 17 Feb 2012
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 95

02 Mar 2012, 5:33 am

The-Raven wrote:
mv wrote:
I also disagree a bit with Attwood. Firstly, there's almost nothing on women with Aspergers and what little there is, is hopelessly pigeonholed. For example, I have a very healthy sex drive, even post-children. Also, I may be naive in some respects, but I'm very worldly in others.

that chapter is mostly based on maxine astons research, she is the one who invented 'cassandra affective disorder' where an aspie causes mental illness in their NT partner. http://www.maxineaston.co.uk/cassandra/
She is not a Dr and only has a psyhology degree, msc and counseling diploma and is an ex wife of an aspie. Most books on aspergers mainly reference her in their relationship chapters, giving them all a negative slant. This is because there is a dearth of research on aspie relationships and so hers is used, despite not being qualified to do research and not being peer reviewed. I think this is a great shame, and hopefully as time goes on more research will be done on aspie relationships and hers will not be the main material used for chapters anymore.

That whole chapter is horrible and says really nasty stuff about aspies as parents, which has bad implications/effects for court custody and social services (such as saying the NT is a 'natural' parenting expert and should have custody and children often hate their aspie parent).


Now it starts to make sense. Another pathetic psychologist that mixes facts with opinions. She is hardly objective and scientific, on the contrary.