Men, Math and Marriage--arguments against marriage

Post Reply New Topic

Can we please calm down about this though, this whole mess is making the both of us mad.

No, I meant what I said. "Make most of the decisions and call the shots."

I wouldn't back down too quickly though - it's all part of the strategy to "gnaw at your opponent relentlessly until they give up - then you win!"

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hCsUpggXqbQ[/youtube]

My personal experience AGREES with the statistics. And if you really feel that all men deserve punishment for the atrocities of a few (especially from the PAST) then you need to also do the same. Go outside, find the first black person you can, and become their slave. That's right. Because whites owned black slaves in the past, they must forever pay for the crimes of their ancestors by becoming slaves themselves.

Not exactly "justice" or "fair" is it?

And thanks for assuming I was "incapable of caring for my kids" when I was the one doing all the cooking, cleaning, teaching AND working while she did nothing at all, then took them so she could get free child support money. That was a nice low blow.

Also interesting how much feminists hate the MRA (which I've never associated with)... the idea that things are unfair in women's favour in any way is appalling to them, and they must fight to shame and discredit wherever possible in the quest for ever more power, wealth and control. Since you've already passed the point of equality and still aren't happy - when will you be? Some feminists say not until all men are subservient, others when all men are in jail, others when men make less than 10% of the world population, others when all men are dead.

So much for equality... this is about domination - and that's more evil than the dead patriarchy ever was.

That is real life,
but so is this, and both are attractive......


Altoids, take them from me, I dare you! Muahahahahaaah!! !

I tell ya Max, it's like talking to the rock of Gibraltar.

I haven't gnawed at anyone in anything I've been gnawed because it seems not going on and on about how oh so great guys when the topic isn't about that is somehow disliking guys and thinking men are all violent... Still have yet to get an answer on why no different than I've yet to get an answer from you on how I'm using a slogan or some of the same battle cries.

Interesting I'd be curious to see such a dynamic. Is it like the portrayal of the unhappy henpecked male partner and the nagging shrew of a female partner?

Last edited by AnonymousGIrl on 09 May 2013, 4:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.

I didn't state you never said gals don't do great things I did question how come you're only upset that I'm not talking about how good guys are when I also didn't talk about how good gals are.

I also didn't mention how guys can be bad without mentioning how gals can be bad as recall I said:
Gals can wave their finger at a gal and magically she's the bad gal.
Guys can wave their finger at a gal and magically she's the bad gal.
Gals can wave their finger at a guy and magically he's the bad guy.
Guys can wave their finger at a guy and magically he's the bad guy.

Show me where I said guys can be bad without mentioning how gals can be bad? Oh that's right because I didn't.

Blaming all genders is blaming gals.

No, the exact reason why we keep this going is because you don't for a second think you are even being a little bit unfair in your ASSumptions. How is "a large amount of men want to treat women like cattle" not insulting to us guys who are the very opposite? I'm not telling you you are blowing this out of proportion, but you could have said "a large amount of men want to treat women like cattle, but i'm sure none of you guys do.", which would have killed this bickering as fast as a bunker buster to the head.

Those were not your words to speak! Anomiel had that opinion first!

No more like the reason you keep this going as you're the only other one talking about this. It's not unfair or insulting to guys who are the very opposite because it's not talking about them nor is it making it a characteristic innate in guys to treat gals as such. No different than saying "a large amount of people are greedy" is not insulting to those that aren't greedy.

I could have said what you put that however I see no reason as I'm not accusing anyone of being part of that large amount. Stating it exists is not an attack on guys or an accusation.

Last edited by AnonymousGIrl on 09 May 2013, 5:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.

See, you keep making assumptions. You will not accept a scenario where women have it better. I'm done here.

You're the one making assumptions asking what if it's like is not making an assumption it's asking a question. My description is not a scenario were gals have it better as being a nagging shrew is not better in my opinion.

Last edited by AnonymousGIrl on 09 May 2013, 5:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.

As for your clarification on your perception I didn't blame gals who do bad sh** again show me where I only blamed guys who did bad sh** when I stated:
Gals can wave their finger at a gal and magically she's the bad gal.
Guys can wave their finger at a gal and magically she's the bad gal.
Gals can wave their finger at a guy and magically he's the bad guy.
Guys can wave their finger at a guy and magically he's the bad guy.