Men, Math and Marriage--arguments against marriage
I have support for his point-of-view and counter-arguments to offer.
The support being me extending this not marrying to apply to gals as well as I find marriage to be quite disadvantageous to gals as it seems gals tend to be regarded as sexual objects to obliged for him to bust a nut in or on, do most of the household/childcare work while contributing financially, and their needs/wants/concerns are dismissed and if mentioned are considered nagging. In my opinion I see no reason for a gal to marry unless she wants to be a maid, cook, nanny, blow up doll who is regarded by her partner as a ball and chain that is oh so lucky to have him.
My counter-arguments being on why the divorce rate is higher and marriage being some advantage to gal...lmfao @ that notion.
Sources for those studies?
Tyri0n
Veteran
Joined: 24 Nov 2012
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,879
Location: Douchebag Capital of the World (aka Washington D.C.)
The support being me extending this not marrying to apply to gals as well as I find marriage to be quite disadvantageous to gals as it seems gals tend to be regarded as sexual objects to obliged for him to bust a nut in or on, do most of the household/childcare work while contributing financially, and their needs/wants/concerns are dismissed and if mentioned are considered nagging. In my opinion I see no reason for a gal to marry unless she wants to be a maid, cook, nanny, blow up doll who is regarded by her partner as a ball and chain that is oh so lucky to have him.
My counter-arguments being on why the divorce rate is higher and marriage being some advantage to gal...lmfao @ that notion.
Sources for those studies?
I think we agree to the extent that we don't need to get into an argument (the traditional institution of marriage is bad for both men and women).
But since you asked:
1. Women more likely to cheat on their partners than men
http://www.mid-day.com/relationships/20 ... ultery.htm
2. Studies: Women genetically programmed to cheat
http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/OnCall/story? ... Yh-xSvwKjk
3. Think men are the unfaithful sex? A study shows WOMEN are the biggest cheats - they're just better at lying about it
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/artic ... ng-it.html
http://www.mid-day.com/relationships/20 ... ultery.htm
A poll of 3000 adults which is not a reputable study to me as I find polls vary some polls will say guys cheat more and some say gals cheat more.
2. Studies: Women genetically programmed to cheat
http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/OnCall/story? ... Yh-xSvwKjk
How is this a source for gals cheating more than guys? It doesn't gals cheat more and it doesn't even state gals are genetically programmed to cheat as the study says "may be genetically programmed to cheat" because they're attracted to different types of guys during their menstrual cycle and they fantasize about guys other than their partner. Going by that logic men are genetically programmed to cheat because they're attracted to different gals almost always and fantasize about other gals than their partner.
3. Think men are the unfaithful sex? A study shows WOMEN are the biggest cheats - they're just better at lying about it
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/artic ... ng-it.html
How is this a source for gals cheating more than guys? It doesn't state gals cheat more as it states for affairs "around 20 per cent for men and a bit over 15 per cent for women" rather it states the possible notion that there could be more gals cheating because gals are better liars than guys in that regards.
Only 1 out of 3 of your sources states gals cheat more than guys.
So your sources are 1 poll, the notion that gals may be genetically programmed to cheat because they fantasize about guys other than their partner and are attracted to different types of guys during their menstrual cycle, and the notion that there may be more gals cheating because gals are better liars? I was looking for a list of studies that stating gals cheat more than guys.
Gotta say, I cant confirm your studies. So I googled around and the studies I found said that men would be more cheating, or that its rather equal, only that women are more on cheating in there 20-30s, and men more in their 30-50s. But normally the statistics are pretty similar, so normally its only about 5-10% more men then woman, so when it comes to 55% cheating men and "only" 50% cheating women, I really dont care for that small difference.
The only study I found, expressing that women would do more cheating is the Fox study.. which is from Fox. ^^
http://www.truthaboutdeception.com/chea ... elity.html
http://www.statisticbrain.com/infidelity-statistics/
http://www.catalogs.com/info/relationsh ... ch-ot.html
http://www.menstuff.org/issues/byissue/ ... stats.html
When it comes to who has advantage or not, when you divorce: Simply care for it. Every country has laws for a divorce. Before you marry, go together somewhere, where you can inform yourself both about these laws. If parts of the local laws dont agree with you, then you can do an additional wedding contract. There is nothing bad about it. In my country you are told "Always read before you sign a contract." And a wedding is also a kind of signing a contract, because in the moment you are married, the wedding laws of your countries force a contract on you, according to the standard laws. So even if you dont have an additional wedding contract, every couple that marries has automatic the standard contract. This has not to be a bad thing, but if you dont buy internet without reading the contract, if you dont buy a car without reading the contract...why the hell shouldnt you simply go with your partner and inform both yourself about the contract you are going to sign? I have told my partner years ago, that I want to do so, not because I dont trust him, but simply because both of us dont know anything about the marrying and divorce laws of my country, so its a good thing to be informed about it.
As example I inherited the house of my grandaunt, and my family wouldnt want, that in case of an divorce my partner would keep the house, no problem if you agree with each other. On the other side an aunt of him wants to give him money so we can build rooms for the children, and with her its the same: If we divorce she would be unhappy if I kept the whole advantage with the house with the new rooms...everything no problem as long as you talk about it, while you are not in divorce-ragemode.
So instead of mourning, take your partner, go to an office that will inform you, and do so. Simply talk about it and inform yourself together, while you are able to do so in a fair and polite way. Its not about tricking the partner, its simply to prevent that both of you will later be tricked by both your lawyers bill. Because everything that you will do afterward, will cost you lots of unnecessary money, both of you could use better. (I simply remember a coworker of me, that needed to pay 50 EUR only so that a lawyer put an official stamp on a paper. O_o )
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 32,890
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
But no, we all have to feel sorry for the dad who ends up paying child support and (*gasp*) driving an old car. Boo friggin hoo.
This would seem to support Mr. Elam's contention that men should stay well away from women.
Your data is the data I've had that in general it's more or less equal and only what I consider a true difference during specific age ranges.
But no, we all have to feel sorry for the dad who ends up paying child support and (*gasp*) driving an old car. Boo friggin hoo.
This would seem to support Mr. Elam's contention that men should stay well away from women.
Egh it seems more to support that gals should stay well away from guys.
Tyri0n
Veteran
Joined: 24 Nov 2012
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,879
Location: Douchebag Capital of the World (aka Washington D.C.)
You can do all that sexy stuff without marriage. I wish we had a system of de facto marriage like they have in Quebec. Basically you can get spousal visitation and tax rights, but you don't have all the same entanglements you have in traditional marriage.
As for the studies, there are tons of them out there.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/lifestyle/61 ... n-men.html
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/women-chea ... YmnBSvwKjk (same rate)
http://www.gadling.com/2010/07/22/women ... new-study/
http://rockinmarriage.com/women-are-now ... marriages/ (more likely to cheat during marriages)
Why Women are More likely to Cheat on their Husbands -- Huffington Post (see, not only Faux Nuse says it!!)
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2012/05 ... 26652.html
I'm sure there are studies showing that slightly more men are likely to cheat too. Given that the studies go both ways, I think my original comment that "women cheat as much, or more, than men" was quite accurate.
Perhaps both genders cheat at the same rates; if I had to play Russian Roulette with this, I would pick "the same rate or within 5% of each other" as my best chance to avoid getting killed. At any rate, it's unfair to say that men are always or even predominantly the cheaters and to blame this for failed marriages. There is as much evidence, or more, to indicate the exact opposite.
Same poll as before
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/women-chea ... YmnBSvwKjk (same rate)
This isn't claiming the same rate in fact it states: "She added that 19 percent of women and 23 percent of men reported cheating, statistics that seem to reflect a closing of the cheating gender gap."
http://www.gadling.com/2010/07/22/women ... new-study/
This is claiming gals cheat more in a specific scenario not in general
http://rockinmarriage.com/women-are-now ... marriages/ (more likely to cheat during marriages)
This isn't claiming gals are more likely to cheat than guys it's claiming gals are more likely to cheat now than they were in the past:
"In the 2010 survey, 19 percent of men reported that they had been unfaithful during their marriages, down from 21 percent in 1991. But women who admitted having an affair increased from 11 percent in 1991 to 14 percent in 2010."
Why Women are More likely to Cheat on their Husbands -- Huffington Post (see, not only Faux Nuse says it!!)
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2012/05 ... 26652.html
Only 2 out of 5 of the sources say gals cheat more than guys so I'm a bit curious as to whether you're actually reading the sources or just doing a quick google?
Tyri0n
Veteran
Joined: 24 Nov 2012
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,879
Location: Douchebag Capital of the World (aka Washington D.C.)
Same poll as before
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/women-chea ... YmnBSvwKjk (same rate)
This isn't claiming the same rate in fact it states: "She added that 19 percent of women and 23 percent of men reported cheating, statistics that seem to reflect a closing of the cheating gender gap."
http://www.gadling.com/2010/07/22/women ... new-study/
This is claiming gals cheat more in a specific scenario not in general
http://rockinmarriage.com/women-are-now ... marriages/ (more likely to cheat during marriages)
This isn't claiming gals are more likely to cheat than guys it's claiming gals are more likely to cheat now than they were in the past:
"In the 2010 survey, 19 percent of men reported that they had been unfaithful during their marriages, down from 21 percent in 1991. But women who admitted having an affair increased from 11 percent in 1991 to 14 percent in 2010."
Why Women are More likely to Cheat on their Husbands -- Huffington Post (see, not only Faux Nuse says it!!)
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2012/05 ... 26652.html
Only 2 out of 5 of the sources say gals cheat more than guys so I'm a bit curious as to whether you're actually reading the sources or just doing a quick google?
At least some of them support it. Yes, I have read the study in the past when it came out. I just thought it was common knowledge and didn't want to (1) dig it up and (2) parse it once again. Anyway, if you read what I wrote, you wouldn't be so nitpicky about it. All I'm trying to say is that it's unfair to blame cheating primarily on men. As you have seen, at least some surveys indicate that women are as likely, or more likely, to cheat.
Different opinions as 2 out of 7 is not what I call some. It's not being 'so nitpicky' to state the almost all the studies you're claiming show gals are more likely or as likely to cheat don't state such. No different than someone is saying a house is yellow and it's blue it's not 'so nitpicky' to tell them it's not yellow but blue.
No one was blaming cheating primarily on guys saying gals having more rights than in the past means they don't have to put up with a cheating husband like in the past is not blaming cheating primarily on guys. Do tell where does this blame cheating primarily on guys rather than explaining a possibility that divorce rates are higher because of gals increasing financial freedom meaning not having to stay in an unfortunate relationship?
"In addition, maybe the divorce rates are higher since women have more rights than to put up with a husband who cheats(In the past they would just keep quiet since they were financially dependent). "
You could quote a million links, Tyrion, the people from the zealot camp will concede nothing. I remember reading the manifesto of ~50 rules such as; "NEVER give an inch, no matter how right they are!" "If they make a valid point, ridicule it so no one will take it seriously."
His personal experience from the law firm with 90% majority in one direction should be convincing enough... you'll note how that point (among others) was conveniently ignored. That's what bugs me about modern feminism... there's no objectivity, no fairness, no real desire for equality... only self-interest and destroying the opponent. If they cared about what was best for the kids, they wouldn't be working so hard to destroy their fathers (not to mention those people in happy marriages!)
Unfortunately, this is why marriage is simply a bad idea for men today... there's a very, very low chance of finding someone who is genuinely kind, MEANS their marriage vows of "for life", and puts someone else's interests before her own. (Of course, the husband is also supposed to be putting her interests before his - so if both people are doing what they should, both parties will be very pleased with the other!)
I'd love to be married to a good person not taken over by greed... any volunteers?
His personal experience from the law firm with 90% majority in one direction should be convincing enough... you'll note how that point (among others) was conveniently ignored.!
If 'zealot camp' was in reference to me:
I'm unsure what is there to concede to as I'm only pointing out which of his sources aren't stating what he claims. So this never give an inch no matter how right they are or ridiculing a valid point is not applicable to me as he is not making a valid or credible point by linking sources that do not state what he claims.
Egh no personal experience is not convincing enough as experiences vary I've known many lawyers and law firm employees with vastly different experiences than his. Neither is applicable to me over statistics.
while I think a lot of the trouble is due to the Entitled Princess Mentality (curse you, Benjamin Spock!), I think the guy doesn't consider the possibility that meeting a woman who is on the pill AND dating her is the worst decision any man who wants to ever have kids could ever make.
If she never goes off the pill and they never spawn, they will probably be fine. But the minute she does, (or several weeks later, when the effects of the pill's hormones completely wear off), there is a good chance she'll realize that suddenly, the man is incompatible! Science has proven this.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Autistic people and marriage |
11 Mar 2024, 3:26 pm |
Greece Has Legalized Same-Sex Marriage |
16 Feb 2024, 11:04 am |
How do you evaluate arguments? How do NTs? |
24 Apr 2024, 2:50 pm |
SCOTUS Begins Hearing Arguments In OR Homelessness Case |
22 Apr 2024, 6:59 pm |